Skip to main content

Getting Out, Goethe, and Serendipitous Ethnography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wellbeing and Self-Transformation in Natural Landscapes
  • 328 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents fieldwork and the success of serendipitous ethnography in context. It further problematises traditional ethnographic methods in relation to this research project working with groups of people in natural spaces. This chapter introduces the diverse research case studies. Crowther details observant participation, happenings upon case studies, and access and involvement with case study groups before moving on to serendipitous ethnography and Goethean observation in this context. This refers to being with groups and utilising responsive and flexible methods whilst observing without ego. Within this chapter, Crowther speaks of the journey, the excursion, and the participation in activities as a primary means to understanding these experiences. She details alternative and organic methods and why serendipitous ethnography is a necessary methodological framework within this research context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These methods were adopted from The Natural Change Project by the facilitator. I felt that my story was no longer my own in this instance—a fate I would not wish to impose on informants.

  2. 2.

    ‘Flow’ (Csikszentmihalyi 2002) describes the phenomenon of ‘being in the zone,’ of times of total immersion in the task at hand when an individual’s body and mind are stretched in an effort to accomplish something worthwhile: perhaps flow may have been encountered within these experiences. In flow, one is said to be in a space where ‘time stops,’ where meaning and purpose is out with the self (Seligman 2011). An integral aspect of flow as in peak experience is a belief that by investing all psychic energy into interaction, one ‘becomes part of a system of action greater than that which the individual self had been before.’ (Ibid: 65).

  3. 3.

    Kahneman and Riis (2005).

  4. 4.

    Kahneman and Riis (2005: 285).

  5. 5.

    Kahneman and Riis (2005).

  6. 6.

    Kahneman and Riis (2005: 286).

  7. 7.

    Kahneman and Riis (2005: 286).

  8. 8.

    Kahneman and Riis (2005: 287).

  9. 9.

    (Moeran 2007: 04).

  10. 10.

    Moeran (2007: 12).

  11. 11.

    Moeran (2007).

  12. 12.

    Moeran (2007).

  13. 13.

    Moeran (2007: 20).

  14. 14.

    Moeran (2007: 13).

  15. 15.

    Moeran (2007: 15).

  16. 16.

    Wilkinson (2017).

  17. 17.

    Wilkinson (2017: 619).

  18. 18.

    Wilkinson (2017: 614).

  19. 19.

    Wilkinson (2017: 619).

  20. 20.

    Ingold (2018: 59).

  21. 21.

    Ingold (2018).

  22. 22.

    Ingold (2018: 61).

  23. 23.

    For a more step-by-step outline of what may be considered as walking and talking as a method, see the ‘Go Along interview ’ (See Kusenbach 2003; Carpiano 2009) more simply described as ‘on the hoof’ conversation by Pinder (2007: 116).

  24. 24.

    This is similar to hanging out or ‘deep hanging out’ (Geertz 2008)—spending downtime or unstructured time with informants, chatting, observing, and so on.

  25. 25.

    Madden (2013: 01).

  26. 26.

    see Kusenbach (2003) and Carpiano (2009).

  27. 27.

    Rivioal and Salazar (2013: 180).

  28. 28.

    Merton 1948 in Rivioal and Salazar (2013: 178).

  29. 29.

    See Glaser and Strauss (1967).

  30. 30.

    Hannerz (2006) in Rivioal and Salazar (2013).

  31. 31.

    in Rivioal and Salazar (2013: 183).

  32. 32.

    Madden (2013: 16–17).

  33. 33.

    Rivioal and Salazar (2013).

  34. 34.

    Fetterman (2010).

  35. 35.

    Rivioal and Salazar (2013: 02).

  36. 36.

    Rivioal and Salazar (2013: 178).

  37. 37.

    Rivioal and Salazar (2013).

  38. 38.

    Law (2004).

  39. 39.

    Le Courant (2013: 186).

  40. 40.

    Le Courant (2013).

  41. 41.

    See Russell et al. (2007).

  42. 42.

    Ingold (2018).

  43. 43.

    Le Courant (2013: 195).

  44. 44.

    Le Courant (2013: 195).

  45. 45.

    Le Courant (2013).

  46. 46.

    Davis (2007).

  47. 47.

    Davis (2007: 09).

  48. 48.

    Davis (2007: 11).

  49. 49.

    Davis (2007: 02).

  50. 50.

    Davis (2007: 02).

  51. 51.

    Davis (2007).

  52. 52.

    in Hazan and Hertzog (2012).

  53. 53.

    Ben-Ari (Ibid: 67).

  54. 54.

    Davis (2007).

  55. 55.

    Herzfeld (2012).

  56. 56.

    Herzfeld (2012: 114).

  57. 57.

    Herzfeld (2012: 114).

  58. 58.

    Hazan and Hertzog (2012).

  59. 59.

    Fabietti also speaks of an interdisciplinary career trajectory and another, Shapira also discusses anthropological serendipity in relation to her career (both in Hazan and Hertzog 2012).

  60. 60.

    Goethe (1823/2010: 19).

  61. 61.

    Greverus (2002: 1).

  62. 62.

    Greverus (2002).

  63. 63.

    Greverus (Ibid: 09).

  64. 64.

    Goethe published his first scientific work in 1790. Though previously he had been considered a philosopher, dramatist, poet, and statesman, he penned The Metamorphosis of Plants (1790/2009). This work is associated with Goethean observation, a way of observing and understanding plants and the non-human natural world.

  65. 65.

    Goethe (1823/2010: 19).

  66. 66.

    Greverus (2002).

  67. 67.

    Greverus (2002: 41).

  68. 68.

    Greverus (2002: 10).

  69. 69.

    Goethe (1823/2010: 20).

  70. 70.

    Ingold (2010: 135).

  71. 71.

    Lewis (2000: 54).

  72. 72.

    Ingold (2010).

  73. 73.

    Senda-Cook (2012).

  74. 74.

    Senda-Cook (2012).

  75. 75.

    Senda-Cook (2012: 144).

  76. 76.

    Philo (2003).

  77. 77.

    Philo (2003: 12).

  78. 78.

    Rousseau (1783/2011).

  79. 79.

    Rousseau (1783/2011).

  80. 80.

    Philo (2003: 07).

  81. 81.

    Bachelard (1960/1969).

  82. 82.

    Berleant (1992: 14–15).

  83. 83.

    Berleant (1992).

  84. 84.

    Berleant (1992: 14–15).

  85. 85.

    Bloch (2012).

  86. 86.

    Bloch (2012).

  87. 87.

    A Scottish stirring utensil.

  88. 88.

    A tool for making holes in the ground to place seeds into.

  89. 89.

    Bion (1970).

  90. 90.

    Bion (1970: 246).

  91. 91.

    Bion (1970: 248).

  92. 92.

    Bird-Rose (2013).

  93. 93.

    Bird-Rose (2013: 93).

  94. 94.

    Tuan (1979).

References

  • Bachelard, G. (1969/1984). The Poetics of Reverie – Childhood, Language and the Cosmos. Boston: Beacon Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berleant, A. (1992). The Aesthetics of Environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1970). Attention and Interpretation. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird-Rose, D. (2013). Val Plumwood’s Philosophical Animism: Attentive Interactions in the Sentient World. Environmental Humanities, 3, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (2012). Anthropology and the Cognitive Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carpiano, R. M. (2009). Come Take a Walk with Me: The “Go-Along” Interview as a Novel Method for Studying the Implications of Place and Health in Wellbeing. Health and Place, 15, 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. London: Rider/Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. (2007, October). Science and Serendipity: Reflections on an Anthropological Career. 55th Annual Harrington Lecture (pp. 1–27). Vermillion: The University of South Dakota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step-by-Step. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (2008). Deep Hanging Out. The New York Review of Books, 45(16), 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Hawthorne: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greverus, I. M. (2002). Anthropological Voyage of Serendipity and Deep Clues. Anthropological Journal on European Cultures, 11, 9–50. Shifting Grounds: Experiments in Doing Ethnography. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43234893

  • Hazan and Hertzog. (2012). Serendipity in Anthropological Research: The Nomadic Turn. Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzfeld, M. (2012). Chapter Five: Passionate Serendipity: From the Acropolis to the Golden Mount. In A. Gottlieb (Ed.), The Restless Anthropologist: New Field Sites, New Visions (pp. 100–122). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2010). Footprints Through the Weather-World: Walking, Breathing, Knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16, s121–s139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2018). Anthropology and/as Education. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Riis, J. (2005). Living and Thinking About It: Two Perspectives on Life. In N. Baylis, F. A. Huppert, & B. Keverne (Eds.), The Science of Well-Being (pp. 285–301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusenbach, M. (2003, January). Street-Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool. PhD Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Courant, S. (2013). What Can We Learn from a ‘Liar’ and a ‘Madman’? Serendipity and Double Commitment During Fieldwork. Young Scholars Forum. Social Anthropology, 21(2), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, N. (2000). The Climbing Body, Nature and the Experience of Modernity. Body and Society, 6(3–4), 58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, R. (2013). Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeran, B. (2007). From Participant Observation to Observant Participation: Anthropology, Fieldwork and Organisational Ethnography. Creative Encounters Working Papers. No. 2 (pp. 1–25). Copenhagen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philo, C. (2003). ‘To Go Back Up the Side Hill’: Memory, Imaginations and Reveries of Childhood. Children’s Geographies, 1(1), 7–23. Carlax Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/1473328022000041634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, R. (2007). On Movement and Stillness. Ethnography, 8(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138107076142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivioal, I., & Salazar, N. B. (2013). Contemporary Ethnographic Practice and the Value of Serendipity. Young Scholars Forum. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 1(2), 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (1783/2011). Reveries of a Solitary Walker: A New Translation by Russell Goulborne. Oxford: Oxford World Classics, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A. W., Wickson, F., & Carew, A. L. (2007). Transdisciplinarity: Context, Contradiction and Capacity. Futures, 40, 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.10.005, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A New Understanding of Happiness and Wellbeing – And How to Achieve Them. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senda-Cook, S. (2012). Rugged Practices: Embodying Authenticity in Outdoor Recreation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 98(2), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2012.663500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. F. (1979). Space and Place. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1969). The Ritual Process – Structure and Anti-Structure. Suffolk: Richard Clay (The Chaucer Press Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1970). The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithica: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Goethe, J. W. (1790/2009). The Metamorphosis of Plants (trans: Miller, G. L.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Goethe, J. W. (2010/1823). The Experiment as Mediator of Object and Subject. In Context 24, 19–23, The Nature Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C. (2017). Going ‘Backstage’: Observant Participation in Research with Young People. Children’s Geographies, 15(5), 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2017.1290924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Crowther, R. (2019). Getting Out, Goethe, and Serendipitous Ethnography. In: Wellbeing and Self-Transformation in Natural Landscapes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97673-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97673-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97672-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97673-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics