Advertisement

Evaluation of Chest Pain and Myocardial Ischemia

  • Thorsten M. Leucker
  • Steven R. Jones
  • Seth S. MartinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Cardiology book series (CONCARD)

Abstract

About 1% of all outpatient visits are related to chest pain, and of these patients, 1.5% will have unstable angina or an acute myocardial infarction. Chest pain represents a wide spectrum of disease, from benign to life-threatening conditions. The primary care provider has an essential role in the initial evaluation of such patients with a focus on a quick rule out of potential life-threatening conditions and further appropriately triaging the patient. The evaluation of patients with stable symptoms should focus on risk assessment for coronary artery disease and appropriate downstream noninvasive stress testing.

Keywords

Chest pain Coronary artery disease Acute coronary syndrome Unstable angina Acute myocardial infarction Myocardial ischemia Risk assessment Electrocardiogram High-sensitivity troponin Noninvasive stress testing Coronary computed tomographic angiography 

References

  1. 1.
    North F, et al. Should you search the Internet for information about your acute symptom? Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(3):213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300(24):1350–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pryor DB, et al. Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(2):81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patel SA, et al. Cardiovascular mortality associated with 5 leading risk factors: national and state preventable fractions estimated from survey data. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(4):245–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lowe LP, et al. Impact of major cardiovascular disease risk factors, particularly in combination, on 22-year mortality in women and men. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(18):2007–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kline JA, et al. Pretest probability assessment derived from attribute matching. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swap CJ, Nagurney JT. Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2005;294(20):2623–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pollack CV Jr, et al. Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(1):13–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    NIH. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence website. 2014 [cited 2016 June 11]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg15
  10. 10.
    Shiga T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(13):1350–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stein PD, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(22):2317–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alexander KP, et al. Value of exercise treadmill testing in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32(6):1657–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berger JS, et al. Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2009;302(8):874–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jneid H, et al. Sex differences in medical care and early death after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;118(25):2803–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amsterdam EA, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130(25):2354–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kwok Y, et al. Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83(5):660–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kohli P, Gulati M. Exercise stress testing in women: going back to the basics. Circulation. 2010;122(24):2570–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hochman JS, et al. Outcome and profile of women and men presenting with acute coronary syndromes: a report from TIMI IIIB. TIMI Investigators. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(1):141–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hendel RC, et al. Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation. 1999;99(21):2742–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duvall WL, et al. A model for the prediction of a successful stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(6):1124–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gibbons RJ. Noninvasive diagnosis and prognosis assessment in chronic coronary artery disease: stress testing with and without imaging perspective. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1(3):257–69. discussion 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoffmann U, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blankstein R. Cardiology patient page. Introduction to noninvasive cardiac imaging. Circulation. 2012;125(3):e267–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Writing Group, M, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):447–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thorsten M. Leucker
    • 1
  • Steven R. Jones
    • 1
  • Seth S. Martin
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Division of CardiologyJohns Hopkins HospitalBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations