Abstract
How articulation operates between employee representatives located at national and local level in multinational companies represents an under-researched topic. Analysing these forms of articulation in multinational companies (MNCs) from an internationally comparative perspective is likely to be especially fruitful in terms of advancing research in this area, as this offers the prospect of understanding how employee representatives at different locations within a single undertaking engage with and interpret problems, define their interests, and seek to aggregate these at the various levels. The countries in which our case-study companies have operations exhibited a wide range of national and local interest arrangements for employee representation. These arrangements were strongly marked by the industrial relations institutions that prevail nationally. The transnational level of interest representation was found to represent a source of power for employee representatives within national structures. One significant structural limit on this, however, is when a local plant or other operation is not directly represented on a European Works Council (EWC) or when there is no effective national level of action and regulation. In these instances, the chain of articulation will be broken and no resources can be transferred to these operations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
At ‘Power’ and ‘Synthetic’ we only conducted interviews in two countries due to scheduling difficulties.
- 2.
According to an agreement from 1991, RSU provide a unified committee for all the unions in the workplace with two third of the members being elected by the whole workforce and one third elected or appointed by the unions.
- 3.
RSA are based on the 1970 Workers’ Statute which provides for trade union representation at company level. The law does not provide detailed rules on how they should be chosen.
References
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Behrens, M., & Kädtler, J. (2008). Neue Zuständigkeiten und Folgen für betriebliche Arbeitsbeziehungen. WSI-Mitteilungen, 61(6), 297–304.
Birkinshaw, J. (2000). Entrepreneurship in the Global Firm. London: Sage.
Bosch, A., Ellguth, P., Schmidt, R., & Trinczek, R. (1999). Betriebliches Interessenhandeln: Zur politischen Kultur der Austauschbeziehungen zwischen Management und Betriebsrat in der westdeutschen Industrie. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
Dörrenbächer, C., & Geppert, M. (2011). Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation: An Introduction. In C. Dörrenbächer & M. Geppert (Eds.), Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation (pp. 3–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drahokoupil, J. (Ed.). (2017). Chinese Investments in Europe: Corporate Strategies and Labour Relations. Brussels: ETUI.
Dunning, J. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
Edwards, T. (1998). Multinationals, Labour Management and the Process of Reverse Diffusion. A Case Study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4), 696–709.
Edwards, P., & Bélanger, J. (2009). The MNC as a Contested Terrain. In S. Collinson & G. Morgan (Eds.), Images of the Multinational Firm (pp. 193–216). Chichester: Wiley.
Ferner, A., & Hyman, R. (1998). Changing Industrial Relations in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, C., & Kelly, J. (2004). Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gumbrell-McCormick, R., & Hyman, R. (2014). Trade Unions in Western Europe. Hard Time, Hard Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoffmann, A. (2006). The Construction of Solidarity in a German Central Works Council: Implications for European Works Councils. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Warwick.
Hymer, S. H. (1960). The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press, 1976.
Katz, H. C., & Darbishire, O. (2000). Converging Divergences. Worldwide Changes in Employment Systems. Ithaca/London: ILR Press.
Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 215–233.
Kotthoff, H. (1981). Betriebsräte und betriebliche Herrschaft. Eine Typologie von Partizipationsmustern in Industriebetrieben. Frankfurt/Main/New York: Campus.
Kotthoff, H. (1994). Betriebsräte und Bürgerstatus. Wandel und Kontinuität der Mitbestimmung. Munich and Mering: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
Kristensen, P. H., & Zeitlin, J. (2005). Local Players in Global Games. The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehndorff, S., Dribbusch, H., & Schulten, T. (Eds.). (2017). Rough Waters: European Trade Unions in a Time of Crisis. Brussels: ETUI.
Leonardi, S. (Ed.). (2015). The Transnational Company Agreements. Experiences and Prospects. Final Report, European Commission. http://www.fondazionedivittorio.it/sites/default/files/content-attachment/Euracta2_Final%20report_0.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2018.
Lévesque, C., & Murray, G. (2012). Understanding Union Power: Resources and Capabilities for Renewing Union Capacity. Transfer, 16(3), 333–350.
Morgan, G. (2001). The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides. In G. Morgan, P. H. Kristensen, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, G., & Kristensen, P. H. (2006). The Contested Space of Multinationals: Varieties of Institutionalism, Varieties of Capitalism. Human Relations, 59(11), 1476–1490.
Pulignano, V. (2017). Articulation Within (and Across) Transnational Workplaces and the Role of European Works Councils. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 23(3), 261–276.
Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. (1987). The Multinational Vision: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, J., & Streeck, W. (Eds.). (1995). Works Councils. Consultation, Representation and Cooperation in Industrial Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (Eds.). (1986). Private Interest Government. Beyond Market and State. New York: Sage.
Western, B. (1997). Between Class and Market. Postwar Unionisation in the Capitalist Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wickens, P. (1987). The Road to Nissan. Flexibility, Quality and Teamwork. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haipeter, T., Hertwig, M., Rosenbohm, S. (2019). Varieties of Articulation: Interest Representation in Multinational Companies at National and Local Level. In: Employee Representation in Multinational Companies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97559-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97559-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97558-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97559-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)