Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Advancement of Optical Methods & Digital Image Correlation in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3 pp 79–80Cite as

Speckles and DIC or Checkerboards and LSA?

Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Two measurement techniques, namely DIC and LSA, are compared in this study. Both techniques consist in minimizing the optical residual. DIC performs the minimization in the real domain on speckles. LSA performs this minimization in the Fourier domain on periodic patterns such as checkerboards. It is shown here that for the same systematic error and the same spatial resolution, the noise level in displacement and strain maps is lower with LSA than with DIC.

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Checkerboard
  • DIC
  • LSA
  • Random error
  • Speckle optimization

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grédiac, M., Blaysat, B., Sur, F.: A critical comparison of some metrological parameters characterizing local digital image correlation and grid method. Exp. Mech. 57(3), 871–903 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Grédiac, M., Sur, F., Blaysat, B.: The grid method for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review and analysis. Strain. 52(3), 205–243 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Bomarito, G.F., Hochhalter, J.D., Ruggles, T.J., Cannon, A.H.: Increasing accuracy and precision of digital image correlation through pattern optimization. Opt. Lasers Eng. 91, 73–85 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Pan, B., Xie, H., Wang, Z., Qian, K., Wang, Z.: Study of subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. Opt. Express. 16(10), 7078 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Schreier, H.W., Sutton, M., Michael, A.: Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions. Exp. Mech. 42(3), 303–310 (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Sur, F., Grédiac, M.: Towards deconvolution to enhance the grid method for in-plane strain measurement. Inv Prob Imaging. 8(1), 259–291 (2014)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Grédiac, M., Blaysat, B., Sur, F.: Beyond speckles and DIC: checkerboards and LSA. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université Clermont Auvergne, SIGMA, Institut Pascal, UMR CNRS 6602, Clermont-Ferrand, France

    M. Grédiac & B. Blaysat

  2. Université de Lorraine, CNRS, INRIA projet Magrit, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex, France

    F. Sur

Authors
  1. M. Grédiac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Blaysat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Sur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Grédiac .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politechnico di Bari, Bari, Italy

    Luciano Lamberti

  2. Graduate Institute of Precision Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Dr. Ming-Tzer Lin

  3. Mechanical Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA

    Dr. Cosme Furlong

  4. Department of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA

    Prof. Dr. Cesar Sciammarella

  5. Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    Dr. Phillip L. Reu

  6. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

    Dr. Michael A Sutton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Grédiac, M., Blaysat, B., Sur, F. (2019). Speckles and DIC or Checkerboards and LSA?. In: Lamberti, L., Lin, MT., Furlong, C., Sciammarella, C., Reu, P., Sutton, M. (eds) Advancement of Optical Methods & Digital Image Correlation in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97481-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97481-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97480-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97481-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Search

Navigation