Skip to main content

Bridging the Gap Between Organizational Institutionalism and Situated Action: A Video-Based Analysis of a Simulation-Based Device in Healthcare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Materiality in Institutions

Part of the book series: Technology, Work and Globalization ((TWG))

  • 516 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter bridge two intellectual traditions that often fail to be brought together in the organization studies literature, namely organizational institutionalism and situated and distributed approaches. While providing a better account of material aspects of institutions, they enhance the role of artefacts and tools as currently accounted by the situated/distributed approach. They couple a reference to materiality of institutions with a reference to the manipulation of objects and equipment in a changing environment. The ambition to establish a dialogue between these two intellectual traditions is made possible by an observation of specific “naturally occurring data”. It gives an access to recorded sequences of actions that provide a fine-grained analysis of the relation between the setting as a local workspace and the arena as a broader institutional context. This method enables to capture a disadjustment between distinct levels of activities: institutional environment (public durable framework), an external plan (defined as both an organizational programme and a scenario for acting) and situated action (real-time local interactional routines). The fieldwork is conducted in an experimental hospital and focuses on the implementation of a digital artefact—a simulation-based training device personified in a lifelike virtual mannequin—initially designed to improve teamwork skills in a health professionals’ community (doctors, physicians and nurses). In line with the tradition initiated by workplace studies, Felix et al. argue that the workspace is made of materials (cognitive artefacts and physical tools) and body movements that act as an external support for action when the environment is prepared and familiar.

We owe a great debt of gratitude to the Maison des Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société (MSHS) Sud-Est, which supported this pluridisciplinary research, and to Alain Percivalle, who gave us access to occurring natural data and took part in the simulation-based device at the hospital. Finally, we would like to thank the organizers of the OAP Seminar in Lisbon (2016) who selected our paper for publication and provided remarkable comments to improve the initial version of our work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Self-confrontation methods are considered as relevant approaches to study information-seeking behaviour, in a psychological trend devoted to working practices’ analysis. Further details on this method could be found in Faita (1997) and Clot et al. (2000).

  2. 2.

    Yet, the kind of drugs given to a patient is decided by the doctor when the patient’s health status results from a specific disease. In vital emergency cases, such as heart attack cases, adrenaline is the standard drug given.

  3. 3.

    Prescriptions regarding medical trolley drawers’ organization used for cardiopulmonary resuscitation could be found on http://www.infirmiers.com/etudiants-en-ifsi/cours/cours-reanimation-le-chariot-durgence.html

References

  • Agre, P. (1985). Routines, MIT Memo 828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agre, P. (1997). Computation and human experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, P. E., & Tanner, C. A. (1987). Clinical judgment: How expert nurses use intuition. The American Journal of Nursing, 87(1), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, T., & Luckmann, P. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxenbaum E., Huault, I., & Leca B. (2016), Le tournant matériel dans la théorie néo-institutionnaliste. In F. X. de Vaujany, A. Hussenot, & J. F. Chanlat (Eds.), Théorie des Organisations: Nouveaux Tournants (pp. 227–238). Paris, France: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., Whetten, D. A., & Kim, M. U. (1987). Organizational dysfunctions of decline. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1996). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clot, Y., Faïta, D., Fernandez, G., & Scheller, L. (2000). Entretiens en auto-confrontation croisée: une méthode en clinique de l’activité. Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé, 2(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vaujany, F.-X., & Mitev, N. N. (Eds.). (2013). Materiality and space: Organizations, artifacts and practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieckman, P., Gaba, D., & Rall, M. (2007). Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2(3), 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2001). Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing. Human Computer Interaction, 16, 239–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faita, D. (1997). La conduite du TGV, exercice de styles. Champs visuels, 6, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations: An introduction. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization, interaction between speakers and hearers (pp. Xii+195). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B., Purdy, J. M., & Ansari, S. S. (2015). From interactions to institutions: Microprocesses of framing and mechanisms for the structuring of institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 40, 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gylfe, P., Franck, H., Lebaron, C., & Mantere, S. (2016). Video methods in strategy research: Focusing on embodied cognition. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, D. J., Green, S. E., & Goodnight, G. T. (2015). A model of rhetorical legitimation: The structure of communication and cognition underlying institutional maintenance and change. Academy of Management Review, 40, 76–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2), 31–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, P. C., & Naglie, G. (2009). Tacit knowledge of caring and embodied selfhood. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(5), 668–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1932). Philosophy of the present. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myths and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the preservation of fundamental features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video analysis. Bern: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, P., & Nicolini, D. (2014). Recovering materiality in institutional work: Prizes as an assemblage of human of material entities. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 21–64). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., & Basurto, X. (2011). Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3), 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2012). The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., & Malhotra, N. (2008). Taking social construction seriously: Extending the discursive approach in institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 702–720). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29, 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, C., Smith, A., Goodwin, D., & Mort, M. (2003). Passing on tacit knowledge in anaesthesia: A qualitative study. Medical Education, 37, 650–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toqueville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 180(4), 795–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relieu, M. (2006). Remarques sur l’analyse conversationnelle et les technologies médiatisées. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, XI(2), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (2009). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2009). Methodological issues in researching institutional change. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 176–195). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1991). Postscript: Microfoundations of institutional thought. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 103–107). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix 1

Video sequence transcription

D: doctor, N: nurse

00.04 :

1. D: allez vite le massage

D: come on let’s go for the massage quickly

Doctor holding oxygenation’s mask on the face of the patient----to 11

ip on the machine ------------------------------------------to 11

Drawers noise --------------------------------------------------to

00.07 :

2. D:: () vite

hurry up

00.14 :

3 D: y a un choc qui est délivré a priori il devrait être délivré ?

there is a shock which is delivered in theory it should be delivered ?

electronic voice AED -----------------------------------------------to 11

00.17:

4 D: allez le choc est. délivré (.) on recule

here it goes shock is delivered(.) you have to be at distance

doctor’s gesture to indicate shock imminence

00.20:

5 D: c’est. bon pour le choc.

it’s ok for the shock

00.23:

6 D: allez on reprend l’massage ()

let’s go and start the massage again

Doctor oriented towards computer----

00.30 :

7 D: c’est bon pour la perf ?=

ready to put the drip on?

Doctor looking at nurse

0031 :

8 N: = ouais je sais je sais (.) il manque du matériel

yeah I know I know (.) material is missing

nurse is still searching for tools ---------------->

00.34 :

9 D: allez la perf c’est posé ?

Come on, is the drip on?

10 N: = ah c’est bon.

I found it

00.40 :

The nurse finds the needle and intravenous drugs

The nurse’s assistant leaving the patient’s bed and going near the nurse

The nurse seems to talk to herself

11 N: (inaudible)

00.42:

The nurse’s assistant looks at the nurse

Appendix 2

Transcription of the nurse’s interview during the auto confrontation session.

R: :

researcher

N: :

nurse

Looking together at the video, the researcher asks nurse to describe the moment when she was searching tools in the trolley’s drawers.

R::

Is it the same material you use in real settings? Usually, have you got some cues concerning the material’s locations?

N::

the configuration is not the same at all that in the… that in our own ward

R::

not the same at all

N::

hmm

N::

completely different. material was not in the usual place, everything was messy in the trolley soso in fact I started panicking, I started panicking rather quickly

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Félix, C., Arena, L., Conein, B. (2019). Bridging the Gap Between Organizational Institutionalism and Situated Action: A Video-Based Analysis of a Simulation-Based Device in Healthcare. In: de Vaujany, FX., Adrot, A., Boxenbaum, E., Leca, B. (eds) Materiality in Institutions. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97472-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics