Abstract
This chapter bridge two intellectual traditions that often fail to be brought together in the organization studies literature, namely organizational institutionalism and situated and distributed approaches. While providing a better account of material aspects of institutions, they enhance the role of artefacts and tools as currently accounted by the situated/distributed approach. They couple a reference to materiality of institutions with a reference to the manipulation of objects and equipment in a changing environment. The ambition to establish a dialogue between these two intellectual traditions is made possible by an observation of specific “naturally occurring data”. It gives an access to recorded sequences of actions that provide a fine-grained analysis of the relation between the setting as a local workspace and the arena as a broader institutional context. This method enables to capture a disadjustment between distinct levels of activities: institutional environment (public durable framework), an external plan (defined as both an organizational programme and a scenario for acting) and situated action (real-time local interactional routines). The fieldwork is conducted in an experimental hospital and focuses on the implementation of a digital artefact—a simulation-based training device personified in a lifelike virtual mannequin—initially designed to improve teamwork skills in a health professionals’ community (doctors, physicians and nurses). In line with the tradition initiated by workplace studies, Felix et al. argue that the workspace is made of materials (cognitive artefacts and physical tools) and body movements that act as an external support for action when the environment is prepared and familiar.
We owe a great debt of gratitude to the Maison des Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société (MSHS) Sud-Est, which supported this pluridisciplinary research, and to Alain Percivalle, who gave us access to occurring natural data and took part in the simulation-based device at the hospital. Finally, we would like to thank the organizers of the OAP Seminar in Lisbon (2016) who selected our paper for publication and provided remarkable comments to improve the initial version of our work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Yet, the kind of drugs given to a patient is decided by the doctor when the patient’s health status results from a specific disease. In vital emergency cases, such as heart attack cases, adrenaline is the standard drug given.
- 3.
Prescriptions regarding medical trolley drawers’ organization used for cardiopulmonary resuscitation could be found on http://www.infirmiers.com/etudiants-en-ifsi/cours/cours-reanimation-le-chariot-durgence.html
References
Agre, P. (1985). Routines, MIT Memo 828.
Agre, P. (1997). Computation and human experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Benner, P. E., & Tanner, C. A. (1987). Clinical judgment: How expert nurses use intuition. The American Journal of Nursing, 87(1), 23–31.
Berger, T., & Luckmann, P. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
Boxenbaum E., Huault, I., & Leca B. (2016), Le tournant matériel dans la théorie néo-institutionnaliste. In F. X. de Vaujany, A. Hussenot, & J. F. Chanlat (Eds.), Théorie des Organisations: Nouveaux Tournants (pp. 227–238). Paris, France: Economica.
Cameron, K. S., Whetten, D. A., & Kim, M. U. (1987). Organizational dysfunctions of decline. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 126–138.
Clark, A. (1996). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Clot, Y., Faïta, D., Fernandez, G., & Scheller, L. (2000). Entretiens en auto-confrontation croisée: une méthode en clinique de l’activité. Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé, 2(1), 1–20.
de Vaujany, F.-X., & Mitev, N. N. (Eds.). (2013). Materiality and space: Organizations, artifacts and practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dieckman, P., Gaba, D., & Rall, M. (2007). Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2(3), 183–193.
Dourish, P. (2001). Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing. Human Computer Interaction, 16, 239–241.
Faita, D. (1997). La conduite du TGV, exercice de styles. Champs visuels, 6, 75–86.
Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations: An introduction. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization, interaction between speakers and hearers (pp. Xii+195). New York: Academic.
Gray, B., Purdy, J. M., & Ansari, S. S. (2015). From interactions to institutions: Microprocesses of framing and mechanisms for the structuring of institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 40, 115–143.
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). London: Sage.
Gylfe, P., Franck, H., Lebaron, C., & Mantere, S. (2016). Video methods in strategy research: Focusing on embodied cognition. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 137–148.
Harmon, D. J., Green, S. E., & Goodnight, G. T. (2015). A model of rhetorical legitimation: The structure of communication and cognition underlying institutional maintenance and change. Academy of Management Review, 40, 76–95.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2), 31–68.
Kontos, P. C., & Naglie, G. (2009). Tacit knowledge of caring and embodied selfhood. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(5), 668–704.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1932). Philosophy of the present. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myths and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the preservation of fundamental features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video analysis. Bern: Lang.
Monteiro, P., & Nicolini, D. (2014). Recovering materiality in institutional work: Prizes as an assemblage of human of material entities. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1), 1–21.
Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Norman, D. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 21–64). Boulder: Westview Press.
Ostrom, E., & Basurto, X. (2011). Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3), 317–343.
Philips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2012). The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 223–230.
Phillips, N., & Malhotra, N. (2008). Taking social construction seriously: Extending the discursive approach in institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 702–720). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29, 635–652.
Pope, C., Smith, A., Goodwin, D., & Mort, M. (2003). Passing on tacit knowledge in anaesthesia: A qualitative study. Medical Education, 37, 650–655.
Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London: Sage.
Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toqueville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 180(4), 795–843.
Relieu, M. (2006). Remarques sur l’analyse conversationnelle et les technologies médiatisées. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, XI(2), 17–32.
Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L. (2009). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2009). Methodological issues in researching institutional change. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 176–195). Los Angeles: Sage.
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.
Zucker, L. G. (1991). Postscript: Microfoundations of institutional thought. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 103–107). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
Appendix 1
Video sequence transcription
D: doctor, N: nurse
- 00.04 :
-
1. D: allez vite le massage
D: come on let’s go for the massage quickly
Doctor holding oxygenation’s mask on the face of the patient----to 11
ip on the machine ------------------------------------------to 11
Drawers noise --------------------------------------------------to
- 00.07 :
-
2. D:: () vite
hurry up
- 00.14 :
-
3 D: y a un choc qui est délivré a priori il devrait être délivré ?
there is a shock which is delivered in theory it should be delivered ?
electronic voice AED -----------------------------------------------to 11
- 00.17:
-
4 D: allez le choc est. délivré (.) on recule
here it goes shock is delivered(.) you have to be at distance
doctor’s gesture to indicate shock imminence
- 00.20:
-
5 D: c’est. bon pour le choc.
it’s ok for the shock
- 00.23:
-
6 D: allez on reprend l’massage ()
let’s go and start the massage again
Doctor oriented towards computer----
- 00.30 :
-
7 D: c’est bon pour la perf ?=
ready to put the drip on?
Doctor looking at nurse
- 0031 :
-
8 N: = ouais je sais je sais (.) il manque du matériel
yeah I know I know (.) material is missing
nurse is still searching for tools ---------------->
- 00.34 :
-
9 D: allez la perf c’est posé ?
Come on, is the drip on?
10 N: = ah c’est bon.
I found it
- 00.40 :
-
The nurse finds the needle and intravenous drugs
The nurse’s assistant leaving the patient’s bed and going near the nurse
The nurse seems to talk to herself
11 N: (inaudible)
- 00.42:
-
The nurse’s assistant looks at the nurse
Appendix 2
Transcription of the nurse’s interview during the auto confrontation session.
- R: :
-
researcher
- N: :
-
nurse
Looking together at the video, the researcher asks nurse to describe the moment when she was searching tools in the trolley’s drawers.
- R::
-
Is it the same material you use in real settings? Usually, have you got some cues concerning the material’s locations?
- N::
-
the configuration is not the same at all that in the… that in our own ward
- R::
-
not the same at all
- N::
-
hmm
- N::
-
completely different. material was not in the usual place, everything was messy in the trolley so … so in fact I started panicking, I started panicking rather quickly
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Félix, C., Arena, L., Conein, B. (2019). Bridging the Gap Between Organizational Institutionalism and Situated Action: A Video-Based Analysis of a Simulation-Based Device in Healthcare. In: de Vaujany, FX., Adrot, A., Boxenbaum, E., Leca, B. (eds) Materiality in Institutions. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97472-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97472-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97471-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97472-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)