Skip to main content

The Practice of Fringe Regionalism: Evidence from the Caucasus and the Sahara

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 172 Accesses

Abstract

Mattheis, Raineri and Russo provide an empirical analysis of the Sahara and the Caucasus through the lens of fringe regionalism. They discuss how these regions have been framed and governed as buffer areas separating distinct regional organisations and regional security areas, and the emergence of competing narratives. They then focus on informal practices and exchanges in specific physical sites and portals within these borderlands, practices which perform connective functions across a region. The chapter demonstrates that the cross-border networks revolving around these connective sites progressively foster the emergence of new identities, and of new regional narratives connected to such identities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This observation contributes to advancing an emerging line of research focused on security pluralism and non-state security providers (Menkhaus 2016; Price 2016). Unlike previous research, however, this thread emphasises the latter’s potential to foster regional integration and security beyond and across the jurisdictions of individual states.

  2. 2.

    To the extent that the Sahara Desert and the Caucasus can be characterised as borderlands, the analysis of their security dynamics contributes to the literature analysing the same phenomena in different case studies, likewise framed as borderlands, in which nevertheless cross-border transnational practices thrive, such as Colombia’s forests (Idler 2013), Myanmar’s heights (Scott 2009), Kyrgyzstan’s valleys (Kaminski and Mitra 2012), and the so-called Af-Pak borderlands (in particular in Rabasa et al. 2007).

  3. 3.

    Tellingly, the specific word adopted by Herodotus to define the concept of “civilised world” is Oecumene, whereas the desert is precisely an an-oecumene. Herodotus’s view recalls Turner’s classical triumphal definition of the “hither edge of free land”, which he attributed to the American western frontier (Turner 1921).

  4. 4.

    At the same time, however, some notable exceptions have surfaced in both the policy and academic worlds to stress the opposite view, that is, the idea that that the Sahara should be seen as a connector. These include: Théodore Monod, the Founder of the French Institute of Black Africa (in spite of the name given to the institution), Joseph Ki-Zerbo, the Burkinabe scholar who edited UNESCO’s General History of Africa and, more recently, William Zartman and Fernand Braudel (Lydon 2015). In addition, the dominant streams of Pan-African ideology advocate for Africa to be seen as a continental unit in the political sense (Van Walraven 1999).

  5. 5.

    However, for over 30 years the exclusion of Morocco from its scope was due precisely to “Saharan” issues, i.e. the unresolved issue of the Western Sahara. Furthermore, just like other organisations with a larger number of members, such as the G77 group at the United Nations, most members of the AU are non-Saharan countries.

  6. 6.

    This refers to the conflict erupted since late 2011–2012 among various non-state armed actors featuring different affiliations (religious, political, ethnic, nationalist) contending the sovereignty of the north and centre of Mali to the internationally recognised government in Bamako.

  7. 7.

    Interview with Malian intelligence officer in Bamako, October 2014.

  8. 8.

    Interview with a former general of the Malian Armed Forces in Bamako, November 2013.

  9. 9.

    http://www.sidwaya.bf/m-3821-declaration-de-nouakchott-.html.

  10. 10.

    Interview with AU military advisor in Bamako, November 2015.

  11. 11.

    Likewise, Marshall’s reconstruction has reassessed and rescaled the visions of Caucasian unity, reportedly ascribable to the activity of the diaspora communities often supported by external actors (Britain, Poland, Turkey, Germany…). “Following the expulsion of their respective governments from the Caucasus by Soviet power, the various representatives of Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the North Caucasus achieved a brief unity ironically altogether lacking earlier” (Marshall 2010: 217), by signing in Paris, in June 1921 a memorandum of understanding, declaring the need for a close “brotherly” union amongst all of them. Caucasian émigrés then established their own formal political organisations (1924), such as the Prague-based “Union of Caucasian Mountaineers” and the Istanbul-based “Caucasian Independence Committee” (which eventually shifted its base of operations to Paris in 1926). Caucasian diaspora communities regrouped in 1926 in Warsaw, where the “People’s Party of Caucasus Mountaineers” was set up. However, in 1927 a Georgian representative called for German support in the creation a unified Caucasus federation with its main political centre in Tbilisi, renovating a traditional rivalry within the Caucasian diaspora that had repeatedly threatened the fragile illusion of unity.

  12. 12.

    On the occasion of a meeting in the framework of the Council of Europe, held in Strasbourg.

  13. 13.

    These countries’ initials form the acronym that gives its name to their coalition. As a matter of fact, with Uzbekistan joining GUAM in 1999, the initiative became GUUAM; nevertheless, the brief period of Uzbek participation lasted only few years, as Uzbekistan firstly decided to suspend its membership three years later and then withdrew in May 2005, following the controversial events that occurred in Andijan. Similarly, the Community of Democratic Choice was established in 2005 and its founding members include Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Azerbaijan has observer status.

  14. 14.

    A non-exhaustive list includes: Support to Integrated Border Management Systems in the South Caucasus; South Caucasus Anti-Drug Programme; Development/Strengthening of Comprehensive Anti-Trafficking Responses in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia; Strengthening Protection Capacity Project in the Southern Caucasus – Developing a Regional Protection Response in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia; Fostering Community Forest Policy and Practice in Mountain Regions of the Caucasus; Sustainable Land Management for Mitigating Land Degradation and Reducing Poverty in the South Caucasus Region; Trans-Boundary River Management for the Kura River; Caucasus Cultural Initiatives Network; The South Caucasus Mediation & Dialogue Initiative for Reignited Peace Processes (see Russo 2015).

  15. 15.

    As part of the process of borderisation occurring at the administrative border between Georgia and South Ossetia, Russian border guards have been deployed and fences and barbed wire have been installed along the line. Borderisation is leading to the segregation of South Ossetia and the creation of a frontier inside Georgia. Georgian criminologist Alexandre Kukhianidze reported that, before borderisation escalated, both Georgian authorities and separatist leaders allowed the border to remain open for smuggling and the movement of criminal groups from one side of the conflict zone to the other. On one hand, Georgian authorities declared that they could not establish Border Guard and Customs Service checkpoints on the Inguri River and Roki tunnel because secessionists would immediately interpret it as an attempt to establish a new border. On the other hand, de facto governments in Sukhumi and Tskhinvali were not able to control their territories and prevent the various (Abkhaz and Georgian) crime groups from engaging in their activities (Kukhianidze 2004: 90). However, the advancement of the borderisation process does not seem to be preventing the seal of the “Administrative Boundary Line” (Author’s visit to the EUMM Field Office Mtskheta, July 2016).

  16. 16.

    They have all been engaged in mimicking the activities of national governments, being involved in “para-diplomatic activities”, dispatching representatives abroad and trying to develop their status in the international context by means of collective legitimation. Abkhazia and South Ossetia applied for membership in CIS and CSTO , as was declared in September 2008 during a joint press conference in Moscow by Sergei Bagapsh and Eduard Kokoity, the Abkhazian and South Ossetian representatives, respectively.

  17. 17.

    Similarly, during the Nineties Abkhazia established relations with two other unrecognised states: Serbian Krajina in Croatia and the Respublika Srpska in Bosnia-Herzegovina.

  18. 18.

    These events were allegedly supported by Russia and can be interpreted as a reaction to the creation of GUAM by the parent-states of the de-facto states http://uaforeignaffairs.com/ua/blog/usi-blogi/view/article/is-it-foreign-policy-of-the-unrecognized-states/#sthash.8h56wOPC.dpuf. See also Kosienkowski 2012: 50.

  19. 19.

    http://uaforeignaffairs.com/ua/blog/usi-blogi/view/article/is-it-foreign-policy-of-the-unrecognized-states/#sthash.8h56wOPC.dpuf.

  20. 20.

    Chechnya’s President Ramzan Kadyrov and the leaders of the other North Caucasus republics immediately voiced their support for the decision to recognise Abkhaz and South Ossetian independence while welcoming their refugees. Furthermore, in August 2008, a Chechen battalion (the Yamadaev-led “Vostok”) participated in the operations in South Ossetia. See Merlin 2011; Zakareishvili 2011.

  21. 21.

    The work of Cosgrove (2007) has popularised the heuristic productivity of insiders’ and outsiders’ perspectives in the field human geography. Interestingly, they had been already employed in security studies with a view to identifying security practices, especially in the context of another so-called “ungoverned space”, such as Somalia (Menkhaus 2006).

  22. 22.

    While part of discussion that follows is based on evidence collected during different rounds of fieldwork in Mali and Niger between 2013 and 2015, we are particularly indebted to the seminal work carried out by Judith Scheele in and about In-Khalil.

  23. 23.

    Interview with north Mali’s resident and security consultant, Bamako, October 2014.

  24. 24.

    Although on these matters, whose intelligibility is by definition obscure, empirical evidence going beyond gossips is hard to collect, many interesting reports citing credible sources have been published. See namely: Briscoe 2014; Lacher 2012; Lebovich 2013; Musilli and Smith 2013; Raineri and Strazzari 2015; Scheele 2009, 2011 and 2012; Shaw and Tinti 2014; UNODC 2011.

  25. 25.

    Interview with Malian police, Bamako, December 2013; and with officer of Mali’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, October 2014. In the most recent years, though, these flows might have changed due to Algeria’s enhanced border controls and to prevailing insecurity in the north of Mali.

  26. 26.

    Interviews with drug experts from Gao and Timbuktu, conducted in Bamako, November 2014.

  27. 27.

    Information confirmed in the framework of interviews with former combatants and UN security experts, conducted in Bamako in November 2014.

  28. 28.

    Interview with Malian criminal prosecutor, conducted in Bamako in November 2014. According to judicial sources François Compaoré, brother of the fallen dictator Blaise Compaoré, was particularly active in the organisation of the cigarette smuggling across the Sahel.

  29. 29.

    Informal practices of mobility have shaped and are shaping regional landscapes paving the way to “the bottom-up and everyday emergence of new orders in the fields of economy, morale, urban development and migration”, as highlighted by The Marshrutka Project (http://marshrutka.net, retrieved on 15 June 2018). The latter indeed is exactly studying how the use of minibuses, locally known as marshrutkas, contributes to the production of post-Soviet social and spatial configurations.

  30. 30.

    Author’s visit to the EUMM Field Office Mtskheta (July 2016); see also The EUMM Monitor: A bulletin from the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, Issue 2 – August 2016 that reports: “[d]espite obstacles, grassroots contacts between Georgians and Abkhaz are increasing. Each day, up to several thousand commuters cross the Enguri River, many to conduct suitcase trade in Abkhazia of commodities and agricultural goods, but also pharmaceuticals and medical equipment”.

  31. 31.

    Author’s conversation with one of the project organisers, Marina Meshvildishvili (Tbilisi, July 2016).

  32. 32.

    Interview with intelligence officer from the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilisation Mission in Mali (MINUSMA), conducted in Bamako, November 2014.

  33. 33.

    For example, Zayats (2001, quoted from Radvanyi and Muduyev 2007: 158) has observed that “thirteen of the eighteen separatist wars in the contemporary world are localised in mountain areas,” arguing that the predisposition to separatist violence can be explained on the basis of the geographic characteristics specific to these areas. Geographic determinism has become popular among Russian geographers and ethnographers in the wake of the work of Lev Gumilev.

  34. 34.

    The Mountain Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic then existed between 1921 and 1924.

  35. 35.

    According to Jones (2000), cultural paradigms explain the role of national identity, traditional values and political culture in Georgia’s foreign policy making.

  36. 36.

    While some of these “Caucasian endeavors” remained inconsistent, contradictory and still “autochthonous” (i.e. in June 1997 Zurab Zhvania proposed an “Interparliamentary Assembly of the Caucasus”), others were promoted or initiated by non-Caucasian actors: early in 1999, Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov proposed that a “Forum on the Caucasus” be convened, while in June 1999 a Caucasian Summit was held in Luxembourg under the aegis of the EU.

  37. 37.

    Giorgi Khutsishvili has supported the idea of unification of the three states (Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan) and the three conflicting territories (Abkhazia, Tskhinvali and Karabakh) granting the latter a special status. Following Khutsishvili’s vision, the Teqali Peace Center has been created in the province of Kvemo-Kartli, at the intersection of the borders among Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia. The idea has been firstly discussed in Yerevan in February 2010 on the occasion of a meeting among civil society organisations entitled “South Caucasian Integration: Alternative Start”; the Tekali process premises on the commitment to actively involve frontline residents in the conflict transformation initiatives, among which there are public hearings – sponsored by the National Endowment for Democracy and implemented by the Armenian non-governmental organisations (NGO) Caucasian Center for Peace building Initiatives. Quite differently, Abkhazian historian and politician, Viacheslav Chirikba has suggested that the formation of common state by Georgia, the North Caucasian Republics of the Russian Federation, the federated Republic of Abkhazia-Apsny, South Ossetia and the Adjarian Republic should have been brought together in the framework of the pan-Caucasian union (Russo 2015).

  38. 38.

    Interviews with a former member of different State Commissions and Georgian experts (Tbilisi, May 2013).

  39. 39.

    Interviews with a Georgian expert and a former Georgian Minister (Tbilisi, May–June 2013).

References

  • Allen Nan, Susan, Irakli Kakabadze, Arsen Kharatyan, Jamilla Mammadova, and Ektarina Romanova. 2009. Zones of Peace in the South Caucasus. Yerevan: Lragir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammour, Aida. 2013. Evolution of the Algerian Defense Policy. Bulletin de Documentation 7/2013. Paris: Centre Français de Recherche sur le Renseignement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anders, Holger. 2015. Expanding Arsenals. Insurgents Arms in Northern Mali. In Weapons and the World (Chapter 6). Geneva: Small Arms Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Daniel. 2008. Beyond Parochialism: Cross-Border Regionalism as a Gateway. In Afro-Regions. The Dynamics of Cross-Border Micro-regionalism in Africa, ed. Fredrik Söderbaum and Ian Taylor. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, Morten. 2014. Guns, Money and Prayers: AQIM’s Blueprint for Securing Control of Northern Mali. CTC Sentinel 7 (4): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boilley, Pierre. 2011. Géopolitique africaine et rébellions touarègues. Approches locales, approches globales (1960–2011). L’Année du Maghreb VII, Dossier “Sahara en mouvement”: 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, Jos, and Delcour, Laure. 2015. A Broken Region: Evaluating EU Policies in the South Caucasus, CASCADE Policy Brief 193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, Fernand. 1979. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, Ivan. 2014. Crime After Jihad: Armed Groups, the State, and Ilicit Business in Post-conflict Mali. Policy Brief. The Hague: Clingendael.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantens, Tomas, and Gaël Raballand. 2016. «Une frontière très très longue, un peu difficile à vivre» : le nord du mali et ses frontières. Recherches et Documents 03/2016. Paris: Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casajus, David. 2011. “Sahara en mouvement”. L’Année du Maghreb VII, Dossier “Sahara en mouvement”: 27–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecire, Michael. 2016. Same Sides of Different Coins: Contrasting Militant Activisms Between Georgian Fighters in Syria and Ukraine. Caucasus Survey 4 (3): 282–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cem Oguz, Celik. 2004. From the Idea of Caucasian Unity to Regional Fragmentation: The North Caucasus, 1990–1999. In The Caspian Region. Vol. II. The Caucasus, ed. Moshe Gammer, 42–61. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claudot-Hawad, Hélène. 1996. Identité et altérité d’un point de vue touareg. In Touaregs et autres Sahariens entre plusieurs mondes. Définitions et redéfinitions de soi et des autres, ed. Hélène Claudot-Hawad, 7–17. Aix-en-Provence: Edisud.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Closson, Stacy. 2010. Networks of Profit in Georgia’s Autonomous Regions: Challenges to Statebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 179 (4): 172–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, Denis. 2007. Mapping the World. In Maps: Finding Our Place in the World, ed. James Akerman and Robert Karrow, 65–115. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. 2015. Valletta Summit, Political Declaration. Valletta, November 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, Serge. 2014. Les Mafias du Mali. Paris: Descartes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Demining Group. 2014. Evaluations des Risques Sécuritaires aux Frontières. Région du Liptako-Gourma: Mali, Burkina et Niger. Report. Bamako: Danish Demining Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, Thomas. 2010. The Caucasus: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. A Broken Region: The Persistent Failure of Integration Projects in the South Caucasus. Europe-Asia Studies 64 (9): 1709–1723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, Harry. 1975. Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In The Handbook of Political Science, ed. Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, 79–137. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia. 2016. The EUMM Monitor: A Bulletin from the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, Issue 2 (August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grémont, Charles. 2012. Villages and Crossroads: Changing Territorialities Among the Tuareg of Northern Mali in the Twentieth Century. In Saharan Frontiers: Space and Mobility in Northwest Africa, ed. James McDougall and Judith Scheele, 131–145. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bruce. 2013. Arguing Sovereignty in Songhay. Afriques: Débats, méthodes et terrains d’histoire 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helly, Damien, and Greta Galeazzi. 2014. The Alphabet Soup of Coordination in the Sahel: In Search of Collective Leadership. Dossier Sahel. Maastricht: ECDPM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horden, Peregrine, and Nicholas Purcell. 2000. The Corrupting Sea. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idler, Annette. 2013. Illicitly Governed Spaces: Drugs, Conflict and Peace in Colombia. OxPeace Talks, May 21. http://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/oxpeace-2013-illicitily-governed-spaces-drugs-conflict-and-peace-columbia-session-1a.

  • IOM. 2014. Fatal Journey. Tracking Lives Lost During Migration. Geneva: International Organisation for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasutis, Grazvydas. 2015. Explaining the Chechen Schism in Georgia’s Pankisi Valley. Caucasus Survey 3 (2): 124–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Stephen. 2000. The Role of Cultural Paradigms in Georgian Foreign Policy. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 19 (3): 83–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julien, Simon. 2011. Le Sahel comme espace de transit des stupéfiants. Acteurs et conséquences politiques. Hérodote 142 (6): 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalatozishvili, Gueorgui. 2012. Reconciliation Market. Vestnik Kavkaza, November 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, Bartolomiej, and Saumya Mitra. 2012. Borderless Bazaars and Regional Integration in Central Asia: Emerging Patterns of Trade and Cross-Border Cooperation. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Robert. 1994. The Coming Anarchy. How Scarcity, Crime, Overpopulation, Tribalism, and Disease Are Rapidly Destroying the Social Fabric of Our Planet. The Atlantic Monthly 273 (2): 44–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khutsishvili, Ketevan. 2016. Across the Enguri Border: Lives Connected and Separated by the Borderland Between Georgia and Abkhazia. In Eurasian Borderlands Spatializing Borders in the Aftermath of State Collapse, ed. Tone Bringa and Hege Toje, 107–131. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosienkowski, Marcin. 2012. Continuity and Change in Transnistria’s Foreign Policy After the 2011 Presidential Elections. Lublin: The Catholic University of Lublin Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukhianidze, Alexandre. 2004. Organized Crime and Smuggling Through Abkhazia and South Ossetia. In Organised Crime, Trafficking, Drugs: Selected Papers Presented at the Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology, ed. Sami Nevala and Kauko Aromaa. Helsinki: European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukhianidze, Alezandre, Kupatadze Aleandre, and Roman Gotsiridze. 2004. Smuggling Through Abkhazia and Tskhinvali Region of Georgia. Tbilisi: Transnational Crime and Corruption Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacher, Wolfram. 2012. Organized Crime and Conflict in the Sahel-Sahara Region. The Carnegie Papers. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Challenging the Myth of the Drug-Terror Nexus in the Sahel. Background Paper 4. Accra: West African Commission on Drugs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebovich, Andrew. 2013. Mali’s Bad Trip. Field Notes from the West African Drug Trade. Foreign Affairs, September 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Bringing the Desert Together: How to Advance Sahel-Maghreb Integration. ECFR Policy Brief. London: European Centre for Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecocq, Baz. 2015. Distant Shores: A Historiographic View on Trans-Saharan Space. The Journal of African History 56 (1): 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, Henri. 1974. La Production de l’espace. Paris: Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 2014. Insight: Surge in Cocaine Trade Undermines Conde’s Bid to Revive Guinea. Reuters, January 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofkrantz, Jennifer. 2011. Protecting Freeborn Muslims: The Sokoto Caliphate’s Attempts to Prevent Illegal Enslavement and Its Acceptance of the Strategy of Ransoming. Slavery and Abolition 32 (1): 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonardo, Dadvid. 2016. The Islamic State and the Connections to Historical Networks of Jihadism in Azerbaijan. Caucasus Survey 4 (3): 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyall, James. 2014. Process Tracing, Causal Inference and Civil War. In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, ed. Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey Checkel, 186–208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, Ghislaine. 2015. Saharan Oceans and Bridges, Barriers and Divides in Africa’s Historiographical Landscape. The Journal of African History 56 (1): 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Gregory. 2014. From Empires to NGOs in the West African Sahel. The Road to Nongovernamentality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alex. 2010. The Caucasus Under Soviet Rule. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, James. 2012. Frontiers, Borderlands, and Saharan World-History. In Saharan Frontiers: Space and Mobility in Northwest Africa, ed. James McDougall and Judith Scheele. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkhaus, Ken. 2006. Governance Without Government in Somalia Spoilers, State Building, and the Politics of Coping. International Security 31 (3): 74–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menkhaus, Ken. 2016. Non-state Security Providers and Political Formation in Somalia. CSG Papers 5. Kitchener: Center for Security Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlin, Aude. 2011. Relations Between the North and South Caucasus: Divergent Paths? Caucasus Analytical Digest Newsletter 27, May 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirimanova, Natalia. 2006. Between Pragmatism and Idealism: Businesses Coping with Conflict in the South Caucasus. In Local Peace: The Peacebuilding Potential of the Domestic Private Sector, Caucasus Case Study, ed. Local Business, 516–550. London: International Alert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musilli, Pietro, and Patrick Smith. 2013. The Lawless Roads, an Overview of Turbulence Across the Sahel. NOREF Report. Oslo: Norwegian Centre for Conflict Resolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD and Sahel and West Africa Club. 2017. Cross-Border Co-operation and Policy Networks in West Africa. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peduzzi, Jean-Luc. 2010. Physionomie et enjeux des trafics dans la bande sahélo- saharienne. Le Maghreb dans son environnement régional et International. Paris: IFRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pliez, Olivier. 2011. Les Cités du Désert : des Villes Sahariennes aux Saharatowns. Marseille-Toulouse: Presses Universitaires Marseille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prelz Oltramonti, Giulia. 2012. Constructing and De-constructing de facto Borders Through Mobility Policies: The Cases of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Paper presented at the 22nd IPSA World Congress, Madrid, July 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Megan. 2016. Setting the Aperture Wider. A Synthesis of Research and Policy Advice on Security Pluralism in Tunis, Nairobi and Beirut. Plural Security Insights Report. The Hague: Clingendael.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabasa, Angel, Steven Boraz, Peter Chalk, Kim Cragin, Theodore Karasik, Jennifer Moroney, Kevin O’Brien, and John Peters. 2007. Ungoverned Territories. Understanding and Reducing Terrorism Risks. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radvanyi, Jean. 2002. Grand Caucase, la «montagne des peuples» écartelée. Hérodote 4 (107): 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radvanyi, Jean, and Shakhmardan Muduyev. 2007. Challenges Facing the Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus. Eurasian Geography and Economics 48 (2): 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raineri, Luca. 2018. Human Smuggling Across Niger: State-Sponsored Protection Rackets and Contradictory Security Imperatives. The Journal of Modern African Studies 56 (1): 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raineri, Luca, and Francesco Strazzari. 2015. State, Secession and Jihad: The Micro-Political Economy of Conflict in North Mali. African Security 8 (4): 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitano, Tuesday, and Mark Shaw. 2014. People’s Perspectives of Organised Crime in West Africa and the Sahel. ISS Paper 254. Dakar: Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retaillé, Denis, and Oliver Walther. 2010. Sahara or Sahel? The Fuzzy Geography of Terrorism in West Africa. CEPS Working Papers, 2010–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, Alessandra. 2015. A Regional House…of Cards? Discursive and Imaginative Processes of Region-Building Within and Around Georgia. Caucasus Social Science Review 3 (1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Regions in Transition in the Former Soviet Area: Ideas and Institutions in the Making. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sangaré, Boukary. 2016. Le centre du Mali : épicentre du djihadisme? Note d’Analyse. Brussels: GRIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanikidze, George. 2007. Islamic Resurgence in the Modern Caucasian Region: ‘Global’ and ‘Local’ Islam in the Pankisi Gorge. In Empire, Islam and Politics in Central Eurasia, ed. Yomohiko Uyama, 263–280. Sapporo: Slavic Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheele, Judith. 2009. Tribus, Etats et Fraude: la région frontalière algéro-malienne. Etudes Rurales 184 (2): 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Circulations marchandes au Sahara, entre licite et illicite. Hérodote 142 (6): 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Smugglers and Saints of the Sahara: Regional Connectivity in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Mark, and Tuesday Reitano. 2013. The Evolution of Organised Crime in Africa. ISS Paper 244. Dakar: Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Mark, and Peter Tinti. 2014. Organized Crime and Illicit Trafficking in Northern Mali. Geneva: Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souleimanov, Emil Aslan. 2015. Jihad or Security? Understanding the Jihadization of Chechen Insurgency Through Recruitment into Jihadist Units. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 7 (1): 86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strazzari, Francesco. 2014. Captured or Capturing? Narcotics and Political Instability Along the “African Route” to Europe. The European Journal of Organized Crime 1 (2): 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toaldo, Mattia. 2015. Libya’s Migrant-Smuggling Highway: Lessons for Europe. Policy Memo. London: European Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Frederick Jackson. 1921. The Significance of the Frontier in American History. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNODC. 2011. The Transatlantic Cocaine Market. Research Paper. Vienna: United Nations Organisation on Drug and Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utas, Mats, ed. 2012. African Conflict and Informal Power, Big Men and Networks. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Lijn, Jair. 2017. For the Long Run. A Mapping of Migration-Related Activities in the Wider Sahel Region. Policy Report. The Hague: Clingendael.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Walraven, Klaas. 1999. Dreams of Power: The Role of the Organization of African Unity in the Politics of Africa, 1963–1993. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welt, Cory. 2005. Political Change and Border Security Reform in Eurasia: The Case of Georgia. Nonproliferation Review 12 (3): 503–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalçın-Heckmann, Lale. 2016. Remembering and Living on the Borderlands in the South Caucasus. In Eurasian Borderlands Spatializing Borders in the Aftermath of State Collapse, ed. Tone Bringa and Hege Toje, 133–158. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakareishvili, Paata. 2011. The North Caucasus: Bone of Contention or a Basis for Russian–Georgian Cooperation? Caucasus Analytical Digest Newsletter 27, May 27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mattheis, F., Raineri, L., Russo, A. (2019). The Practice of Fringe Regionalism: Evidence from the Caucasus and the Sahara. In: Fringe Regionalism. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97409-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics