Horror “After Theory”



Building on accounts offered by Judith Ryan and Nicholas Dames, Enright explores the ways in which Paul Tremblay’s novel, A Head Full of Ghosts, helps situate the horror genre within conversations about literature “after” literary theory. This chapter demonstrates that Tremblay comes alongside a number of other authors included in what Dames terms the “theory generation,” authors who make theory part of the content of their novels and thus comment on the still-evolving relationship between literature and literary studies. Enright shows that Tremblay uniquely implicates horror fiction as part of this conversation, drawing renewed attention to the historical relationship between the horror genre and postmodernism.


Horror Fiction Horror Genre Danielewski Leave House postmodernPostmodern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, Robert. 2016. The Rashomon Effect and Communication. Canadian Journal of Communication 41: 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barone, Matt. 2012. The 25 Best Horror Novels of the New Millennium. CompLex, March 28. Accessed June 27, 2017.
  3. Baudrillard, Jean. 1981. Simulacra & Simulation. Trans. Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, Noël. 1990. The Philosophy of Horror; Or, Paradoxes of the Heart. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Chess, Shira, and Eric Newsom. 2015. Folklore, Horror Stories, and the Slender Man. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Creed, Barbara. 1993. From Here to Modernity: Feminism and Postmodernism. In A Postmodern Reader, ed. Joseph Natoli and Linda Hutcheon, 398–418. Albany: State University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dames, Nicholas. 2012. The Theory Generation. n+1, 14. Accessed June 28, 2017.
  8. Derry, Charles. 2009. Dark Dreams 2.0: A Psychological History of the Modern Horror Film from the 1950s to the 21st Century. Jefferson: McFarland.Google Scholar
  9. Dzieza, Josh. 2011. Horror Fiction Goes Highbrow in New Novels and Granta. The Daily Beast, October 30. Accessed December 18, 2017.
  10. Eugenides, Jeffrey. 2011. The Marriage Plot. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
  11. Foxe, Steve. 2016. The 21 Best Horror Books of the 21st Century. Paste, October 18. Accessed June 27, 2017.
  12. Hutcheon, Linda. 1989. The Politics of Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Jackson, Kimberly. 2013. Technology, Monstrosity, and Reproduction in Twenty-First Century Horror. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jameson, Fredric. 2000. The Jameson Reader, ed. Michael Hardt and Kathi Weeks. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Lerner, Ben. 2011. Leaving the Atocha Station. Minneapolis: Coffee House Press.Google Scholar
  16. Morton, Lisa. 2017. HWA in the 21st Century. Horror Writers Association, June 4. Accessed June 26, 2017.
  17. Nealon, Jeffrey. 2012. Post-Postmodernism: Or, the Cultural Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism. Stanford: University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ryan, Judith. 2012. The Novel After Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Spector, Nicole Audrey. 2016. Horror Authors Take a Stab at Self-Publishing. Publishers Weekly, October 21. Accessed June 26, 2017.
  20. Toth, Josh. 2013. Healing Postmodern America: Plasticity and Renewal in Danielewski’s House of Leaves. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 54 (2): 181–197.Google Scholar
  21. Tremblay, Paul. 2015. A Head Full of Ghosts. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loyola University ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations