Advertisement

An Untrustworthy Entertainer: Populist Identities in the Voices of New Zealand Voters

  • Jay M. WoodhamsEmail author
Chapter
  • 507 Downloads

Abstract

New Zealand, like many other democratic countries, has a long history of populist politicians. In the current political scene, Winston Peters and his New Zealand First Party represent the clearest examples of populism (Gustafson, 2006). Drawing on a set of recorded interviews with Wellington voters, Woodhams examines the ways in which Peters’ claims to a populist identity are negotiated in interaction (Gee, 2000). Analysis identifies a division between younger and older voters: younger participants tend to prioritise Peters’ entertaining qualities, whereas the older foreground his political experience, unpredictability and untrustworthiness. All participants engage in different ways with Peters’ identities, indicating the mixed success of populist strategies in this context and demonstrating the importance of listening to the voices of the people in the study of populist discourse.

Keywords

Discourse Populism Identity Politics New Zealand 

References

  1. Al Nashmi, E., Cleary, J., Molleda, J.-C., & McAdams, M. (2010). Internet political discussions in the Arab world: A look at online forums from Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan. International Communication Gazette, 72(8), 719–738.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510380810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baiocchi, G. (2003). Emergent public spheres: Talking politics in participatory governance. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 52–74.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3088902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baynham, M. (1996). Direct speech: What’s it doing in non-narrative discourse? Journal of Pragmatics, 25(1), 61–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00074-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Betz, H.-G. (2002). Conditions favoring the success and failure of radical right-wing populist parties in contemporary democracies. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 197–213). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Betz, H.-G. (2005). Against the system: Radical right-wing populism’s challenge to liberal democracy. In J. Rydgren (Ed.), Movements of exclusion: Radical right-wing populism in the Western world (pp. 25–40). New York, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  6. Betz, H.-G., & Johnson, C. (2004). Against the current—Stemming the tide: The nostalgic ideology of the contemporary radical populist right. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 311–327.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhavnani, K.-K. (1991). Talking politics: A psychological framing of views from youth in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonikowski, B., & Gidron, N. (2016). The populist style in American politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952–1996. Social Forces, 94(4), 1593–1621.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowler, S., Denemark, D., Donovan, T., & McDonnell, D. (2017). Right-wing populist party supporters: Dissatisfied but not direct democrats. European Journal of Political Research, 56, 70–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Busby, R. (2009). Marketing the populist politician: The demotic democrat. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caiani, M., & Porta, D. della. (2011). The elitist populism of the extreme right: A frame analysis of extreme right-wing discourses in Italy and Germany. Acta Politica, 46(2), 180–202.  https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2010.28.
  15. Canovan, M. (2002). Taking politics to the people: Populism as the ideology of democracy. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 25–44). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collier, A. (1994). Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Coulmas, F. (Ed.). (1986). Direct and indirect speech. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  18. Damari, R. R. (2010). Intertextual stancetaking and the local negotiation of cultural identities by a binational couple. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(5), 609–629.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00456.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 149–173.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Du Bois, J. W., & Kärkkäinen, E. (2012). Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk, 32(4), 433–451.  https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Electoral Commission. (2012). 2011 general election official result. Retrieved July 7, 2017, from http://electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2011/.
  24. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fairclough, N. (2005). Peripheral vision discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), 915–939.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fetzer, A. (2013). The multilayered and multifaceted nature of political discourse. In A. Fetzer (Ed.), The pragmatics of political discourse: Explorations across cultures (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5–38.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207311247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gale, P. (2004). The refugee crisis and fear: Populist politics and media discourse. Journal of Sociology, 40(4), 321–340.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783304048378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Gerodimos, R. (2015). The ideology of far-left populism in Greece: Blame, victimhood and revenge in the discourse of Greek anarchists. Political Studies, 63(3), 608–625.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. González-Bailón, S., Banchs, R. E., & Kaltenbrunner, A. (2012). Emotions, public opinion, and U.S. presidential approval rates: A 5-year analysis of online political discussions. Human Communication Research, 38(2), 121–143.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01423.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gordon, C. (2004). ‘Al gore’s our guy’: Linguistically constructing a family political identity. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 607–631.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504045034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gumperz, J. J. (2001). Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 215–228). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Gumperz, J. J. (2009). Contextualization conventions. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), The new sociolinguistics reader (pp. 598–606). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gustafson, B. (2006). Populist roots of political leadership in New Zealand. In R. Miller & M. Mintrom (Eds.), Political leadership in New Zealand (pp. 51–69). Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hatoss, A. (2012). Where are you from? Identity construction and experiences of ‘othering’ in the narratives of Sudanese refugee-background Australians. Discourse & Society, 23(1), 47–68.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. The American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1197–1216.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1962585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson, C., Patten, S., & Betz, H.-G. (2005). Identitarian politics and populism in Canada and the Antipodes. In J. Rydgren (Ed.), Movements of exclusion: Radical right-wing populism in the Western world (pp. 85–100). New York, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, J. P. (2010). Entertaining politics (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  44. KhosraviNik, M. (2009). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse & Society, 20(4), 477–498.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509104024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kirkwood, J. (2007). Tall poppy syndrome: Implications for entrepreneurship in New Zealand. Journal of Management and Organization, 13(4), 366–382.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200003606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klofstad, C. A. (2007). Talk leads to recruitment: How discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60(2), 180–191.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907301708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12–44). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  48. Laclau, E. (2005). Populism: What’s in a name? In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 32–49). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  49. Manning, N., Penfold-Mounce, R., Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. (2017). Politicians, celebrities and social media: A case of informalisation? Journal of Youth Studies, 20(2), 127–144.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1206867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McLachlan, B. T. (2013). In search of a New Zealand populism: Heresthetics, character and populist political leadership (Unpublished master’s thesis). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  51. Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 1–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Milroy, L., & Gordon, M. (2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moir, J. (2016, August 16). NZ first are on their own calling for a referendum on decriminalising cannabis. Stuff. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/83173728/nz-first-are-on-their-own-calling-for-a-referendum-on-decriminalising-cannabis.
  55. Mouly, V. S., & Sankaran, J. (2000). The tall poppy syndrome in New Zealand: An exploratory investigation. In M. Sheehan, S. Ramsay, & J. Patrick (Eds.), Transcending boundaries: Integrating people, processes and systems (pp. 285–289). Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia: School of Management.Google Scholar
  56. Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mudde, C. (2010). The populist radical right: A pathological normalcy. West European Politics, 33(6), 1167–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.508901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Munshi, D. (1998). Media, politics, and the Asianisation of a polarised immigration debate in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Communication, 25(1), 97.Google Scholar
  60. New Zealand First Party. (2012, August 14). Two question referendum required on same sex marriage [Press release]. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1208/S00182/two-question-referendum-required-on-same-sex-marriage.htm.
  61. New Zealand First Party. (2017, July 14). We’re challenging you to an immigration debate [Press release]. Retrieved July 16, 2017, from http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1707/S00224/were-challenging-you-to-an-immigration-debate.htm.
  62. Nolan, M. (2007). The reality and myth of New Zealand egalitarianism: Explaining the pattern of a labour historiography at the edge of empires. Labour History Review, 72(2), 113–134.  https://doi.org/10.1179/174581807X224560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Norocel, O. C. (2013). ‘Give us back Sweden!’ A feminist reading of the (re)interpretations of the folkhem conceptual metaphor in Swedish radical right populist discourse. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 21(1), 4–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2012.741622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Panizza, F. (2005a). Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 1–31). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  65. Panizza, F. (Ed.). (2005b). Populism and the mirror of democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  66. Peters, W. (2002, July 25). A house divided [Speech transcript]. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0207/S00673.htm.
  67. Peters, W. (2010, January 29). MMP—The inside story [Speech transcript]. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1001/S00116.htm.
  68. Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J. N. (2006). Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory, 16(1), 47–74.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00005.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. QSR International Pty Ltd. (2017). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 11) [Windows]. QSR International Pty Ltd. Retrieved from https://www.qsrinternational.com/.
  70. Rapley, M. (1998). ‘Just an ordinary Australian’: Self-categorization and the discursive construction of facticity in ‘new racist’ political rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), 325–344.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01175.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rydgren, J. (2007). The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 241–262.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sayer, A. (2010). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sotillo, S. M., & Wang-Gempp, J. (2004). Using corpus linguistics to investigate class, ideology, and discursive practices in online political discussions. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Applied corpus linguistics: A multidimensional perspective (pp. 91–122). Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.). (2000). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  76. Spoonley, P., & Berg, L. D. (1997). Refashioning racism: Immigration, multiculturalism and an election year. New Zealand Geographer, 53(2), 46–50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.1997.tb00499.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Street, J. (2004). Celebrity politicians: Popular culture and political representation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(4), 435–452.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00149.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Street, J. (2011). Mass media, politics and democracy (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Street, J. (2012). Do celebrity politics and celebrity politicians matter? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 14(3), 346–356.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00480.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tannen, D. (1986). Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (pp. 311–332). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  81. TVNZ. (2017, June 18). Q + A: Tracey Martin and Sue Bradford [Press release]. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1706/S00244/qa-tracey-martin-and-sue-bradford.htm.
  82. van Zoonen, L., Muller, F., Alinejad, D., Dekker, M., Duits, L., van Romondt Vis, P., & Wittenberg, W. (2007). Dr. Phil meets the candidates: How family life and personal experience produce political discussions. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24(4), 322–338.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180701560849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vine, B., Johnson, G., O’Brien, J., & Robertson, S. (2002). Wellington archive of New Zealand English transcriber’s manual. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers, 5. Retrieved from https://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/centres-and-institutes/language-in-the-workplace/docs/ops/op5.pdf.
  84. Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  85. Wodak, R. (Ed.). (1989). Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  86. Wodak, R. (2003). Populist discourses: The rhetoric of exclusion in written genres. Document Design, 4(2), 132–148.  https://doi.org/10.1075/dd.4.2.04wod.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wodak, R. (2009a). Staging politics in television: Fiction and/or reality? In S. Habscheid & C. Knobloch (Eds.), Einigkeitsdiskurse (pp. 33–57). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91425-1_3.
  88. Wodak, R. (2009b). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  89. Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  91. Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M., & Mral, B. (Eds.). (2013). Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  92. Woodhams, J. M. (2011). Trimming the safety net: Metaphorical representations of social welfare in New Zealand political discourse (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  93. Woodhams, J. M. (2012). A journey towards employment: Metaphorical representations of social welfare in New Zealand. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(1), 41–60.  https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.1.03woo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Woodhams, J. M. (2015). A critical realist study of political identity in Aotearoa New Zealand: Materiality, discourse and context (Unpublished Doctoral thesis). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  95. Yates, M., & Youniss, J. (1998). Community service and political identity development in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 495–512.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01232.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations