Advertisement

Representing the People: Claiming the Heartland in Scottish Election Manifestos

  • Ruth BreezeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Breeze examines the way in which populist discourses develop in the official self-presentations of the four main political parties in Scotland before and after the Scottish Independence Referendum. Her analysis focuses on categories related to place, identity and belonging, showing how layers of ideological difference are materialised in political discourse. The positioning of the Scottish Nationalist Party (SNP) is consistently Scottish in terms of discursive stance and deictic centre, while other parties have difficulties negotiating the overlap of UK and Scottish identity. Populist traits in SNP discourses include the identification of an external antagonist, and the configuration of discursive dichotomies firmly placing ‘the people of Scotland’ in a ‘we’ versus ‘them’ relationship with a number of discursive ‘others.’

Keywords

Semantic analysis Corpus analysis Populism Scotland 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to acknowledge the support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Mineco), through the research project: Imagining the people in the new politics, Ref. FFI2015-65252-R.

References

  1. Achard, P. (1993). Discourse and social praxis in the construction of nation and state. Discourse & Society, 4, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Heijin, B. (2015). Covering Muslim women: Semantic macrostructures in BBC news. Discourse & Communication, 9, 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Budge, I., Robertson, D., & Hearl, D. (Eds.). (1987). Ideology, strategy, and party change: Spatial analysis of post-war election programmes in nineteen democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Canovan, M. (2005). The people. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cap, P. (2002). Explorations in political discourse: Methodological and critical perspectives. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. De Cleen, B. (2016). Representing ‘the people’: The articulation of nationalism and populism in the rhetoric of the Flemish VB. In J. Jamin (Ed.), Le destin de la norme (pp. 224–242). Brussels: Academia Bruylant.Google Scholar
  10. Higgins, M. (2004). Putting the nation in the news: The role of location formulation in a selection of Scottish newspapers. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 633–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laclau, E. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Law, A. (2001). Near and far: Banal national identity and the press in Scotland. Media, Culture and Society, 23, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style and representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Shaughnessy, N. (2014). The role of rhetoric: Political rhetoric as function and dysfunction. In J. Atkins, A. Finlayson, J. Martin, & N. Turnbull (Eds.), Rhetoric in British politics and society (pp. 17–29). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Pelinka, A. (2014). Right-wing populism: Concept and typology. In R. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik, & B. Mral (Eds.), Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse (pp. 3–22). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  18. Petersoo, P. (2007a). What does ‘we’ mean? National deixis in the media. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(3), 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Petersoo, P. (2007b). Reconsidering otherness: Constructing Estonian identity. Nations and Nationalism, 13(1), 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Potts, A. (2015). Filtering the flood: Semantic tagging as a method of identifying salient discourse topics in a large corpus of Hurricane Katrina reportage. In P. Baker & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora and discourse studies (pp. 285–304). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rooduijn, M., & Pauwels, T. (2011). Measuring populism: Comparing two methods of content analysis. West European Politics, 34(6), 1272–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosie, M., Petersoo, P., MacInnes, J., Condor, S., & Kennedy, J. (2006). Mediating which nation? Citizens and national identity in the British press. Social Semiotics, 16, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruzza, C., & Balbo, L. (2013). Italian populism and the trajectories of two leaders: Silvio Berlusconi and Umberto Bossi. In R. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik, & B. Mral (Eds.), Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse (pp. 163–175). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  24. Simmel, G. (1997). The sociology of space. In D. Frisby & M. Featherstone (Eds.), Simmel on culture: Selected writings (pp. 137–169). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in action: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  27. Trump, D. (2015, July 18). First Republican debate speech. Ames, IA: Family Leadership Summit.Google Scholar
  28. Wodak, R. (2014). ‘Anything goes!’—The Haiderisation of Europe. In R. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik, & B. Mral (Eds.), Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse (pp. 23–38). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  29. Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing political discourses mean. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M., & Mral, B. (2014). Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Cultura Y SociedadUniversity of NavarraPamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations