Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Pitfalls of Systemic Innovations for Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation for Sustainability

Abstract

Systemic innovation can deliver influential sustainability solutions, but it occurs rarely. Increasing sustainability challenges firms to improve the system as a whole through broadening their engagement by game-changing innovations. This empirical case study explores the challenges faced by Finnish business leaders that hold back attempts at systemic innovation for sustainability. The challenges were identified to be caused by structural impediments, uncertainty avoidance and conflicting aims within and between firms. These in turn manifest as cumulative problems in managing opportunity costs, outcome uncertainties and communication problems along the entire innovation process. The study highlights the need for firms to acquire capabilities for sustainability by focusing on building capabilities in open innovation, evaluating and seizing radical opportunities and reconfiguring the organization for systemic innovations for sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Accenture. 2015. “Special edition: A call to climate action”. The UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study. Accessed May 25, 2018. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/library/3551.

  • Adams, Richard, S. Jeanrenaud, J. Bessant, D. Denyer, and P. Overy. 2016. “Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review.” International journal of Management Reviews 18 (2): 180–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambec, Stefan, and P. Lanoie. 2008. “Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview.” Academy of Management Perspectives 22: 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anttonen, Markku, M. Halme, E. Houtbeckers, and J. Nurkka. 2013. “The other side of sustainable innovation: Is there a demand for innovative services?” Journal of Cleaner Production 45: 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnam, Sarah, R. Cagliano, and M. Grivaljo. 2018. “How should firms reconcile their open innovation capabilities for incorporating external actors in innovations aimed at sustainable development?” Journal of Cleaner Production 170: 950–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, Nancy, S. Short, P. Rana, and S. Evans. 2014. “A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes.” Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boons, Frank, C. Montalvo, J. Quist, and M. Wagner. 2013. “Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: An overview.” Journal of Cleaner Production 45: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boström, Magnus, A. Jönsson, S. Lockie, and A. Mol. 2015. “Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: Challenges and opportunities.” Journal of Cleaner Production 107: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, Juliet, and A. Strauss. 2015. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 4th ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, Robert, I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim. 2014. “The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance.” Management Science 60 (11): 2835–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen, and M. Graebner. 2007. “Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen, and J. Martin. 2000. “Dynamic capabilities: What are they?” Strategic Management Journal 21: 1105–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, John. 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of sustainability. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry, and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. “The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations.” Research Policy 29 (2): 109–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaziulusoy, A. Idil, and H. Brezet. 2015. “Design for system innovations and transitions: A conceptual framework integrating insights from sustainability science and theories of system innovations and transitions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 108: 558–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Tobias, F. Figge, J. Pinkse, and L. Preuss, L. 2010. “Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it.” Business Strategy and the Environment 19: 217–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Jeremy, S. Matos, B. Silvestre, and M. Martin. 2011. “Managing technological and social uncertainties of innovation: The evolution of Brazilian energy and agriculture.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (7): 1147–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Erik G., F. Grosse-Dunker, and R. Reichwald. 2009. “Sustainability innovation cube—A framework to evaluate sustainability oriented innovations.” International Journal of Innovation Management 13 (4): 683–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, Constance, and M. Peteraf. 2003. “The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles.” Strategic Management Journal 24: 997–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inigo, Edurne, and L. Albareda. 2016. “Understanding sustainable innovation as complex adaptive system: A systemic approach to the firm.” Journal of Cleaner Production 126: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, Ulrich. 2011. “Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions.” Academy of Management Perspectives 25 (1): 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, Ulrich, and E. Lichtenthaler. 2009. “A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity.” Journal of Management Studies 46 (8): 1315–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Yuan-Hsu, and M.-L. Tseng. 2016. “Assessing the competitive priorities within sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty.” Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 2133–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, Helen, M. Johnson, M. Bastl, and S. Evans. 2011. “Product service systems and supply network relationships: An exploratory case study.” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 22: 293–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Rodriguez, A. Sakhel, and T. Busch. 2017. “Corporate investments and environmental regulation: The role of regulatory uncertainty, regulation-induced uncertainty, and investment history.” European Management Journal 31 (1): 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, Rodriguez. 2015. “A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 22(1): 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markad, Jochen, R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects.” Research Policy 41: 955–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, Janine, J. Ribeiro, and M. Cortimiglia. 2014. “Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: A systematic literature review.” Journal of Cleaner production 65: 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignon, Ingrid, and A. Bergek. 2016. “System- and actor-level challenges for diffusion of renewable electricity technologies: An international comparison.” Journal of Cleaner Production 128: 105–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylan, Josephine, F. Geels, S. Gee, A. McMeekin, and C. Foster. 2015. “Eco-innovation and retailers in milk, beef and bread chains: Enriching environmental supply chain management with insights from innovation studies.” Journal of Cleaner Production 107: 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, Ram, C. Prahalad, and M. Rangaswami. 2009. “Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation.” Harvard Business Review 8 (9): 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noppers, Ernst, K. Keizer, M. Bockarjova, and L. Steg. 2015. “The adoption of sustainable innovations: The role of instrumental, environmental, and symbolic attributes for earlier and later adopters.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 44: 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quist, Jaco, and A. Tukker. 2013. “Knowledge collaboration and learning for sustainable innovation and consumption: Introduction to the ERSCP portion of this special volume.” Journal of Cleaner Production 48: 167–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, Samuel, P. Cousins, and R. Lamming. 2016. “Developing eco-innovations: A three stage typology for supply networks.” Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 1948–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, Stefan, and M. Wagner. 2011. “Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions.” Business Strategy and the Environment 20 (4): 222–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiederig, Tim, F. Tietze, and C. Herstatt. 2012. “Green innovation in technology and innovation management—An exploratory literature review.” R&D Management 42 (2): 180–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seebode, Dorothea, S. Jeanrenaud, and J. Bessant. 2012. “Managing innovation for sustainability.” R&D Management 42(3): 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre, Bruno. 2015. “A hard nut to crack! Implementing supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy.” Journal of Cleaner Production 96: 171–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Stanley, J. Mohr, and S. Sengupta. 2013. “Radical product innovation capability: Literature review, synthesis, and illustrative research propositions.” The Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (3): 552–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David. 2007. “Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance.” Strategic Management Journal 28: 1319–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David. 2017. “Business models and dynamic capabilities.” Long Range Planning 51 (1): 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.” Strategic Management Journal 18: 509–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch, S. J. M., J. Brezet, and P. Vergragt. 2015. “How to kick off system innovation: A Rotterdam case study of the transition to a fuel cell transport system.” Journal of Cleaner Production 13: 1027–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezzoli, Carlo, F. Ceschin, J. Diehl, and C. Kohtala. 2015. “New design challenges to widely implement ‘Sustainable Product-Service Systems’.” Journal of Cleaner Production 97: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesseling, Joeri H., and A. Van der Vooren. 2017. “Lock-in of mature innovation systems: The transformation toward clean concrete in the Netherlands.” Journal of Cleaner Production 155: 114–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney. 2003. “Understanding dynamic capabilities.” Strategic Management Journal 24: 991–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xavier, Amanda, R. Naveiro, A. Aoussat, and T. Reyes. 2017. “Systematic literature review of eco-innovation models: Opportunities and recommendations for future research.” Journal of Cleaner Production 149: 1278–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Robert. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerling, Eric, H. Purtik, and I. Welpe. 2017. “End-users as co-developers for novel green products and services—An exploratory case study analysis of the innovation process in incumbent firms.” Journal of Cleaner Production 162: S51–S58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LUT University, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Nina Tura & Antero Kutvonen

  2. Climate-KIC Australia, Chippendale, NSW, Australia

    Genevieve Mortimer

Authors
  1. Nina Tura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Genevieve Mortimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antero Kutvonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Tura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Nancy Bocken

  2. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Paavo Ritala

  3. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Laura Albareda

  4. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Robert Verburg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tura, N., Mortimer, G., Kutvonen, A. (2019). Exploring the Pitfalls of Systemic Innovations for Sustainability. In: Bocken, N., Ritala, P., Albareda, L., Verburg, R. (eds) Innovation for Sustainability. Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97385-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation