Environmental Factors in Business Engagement in Innovation for Sustainability

  • Edurne A. InigoEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth book series (PSSBAFE)


In this chapter, Iñigo explores the environmental factors that affect the engagement of businesses in innovation for sustainability (IfS). Looking at the literature on dynamic capabilities and socio-technical transitions and drawing on empirical evidence of eight cases of companies leading the way in IfS, three different degrees of dynamism are identified. In stable environments, firms often adopt a rather reactive approach to IfS, innovating towards compliance. In dynamic environments, firms draw an IfS-based strategy, offering solutions to challenges in their environment. Finally, discontinuous environments, despite the risks for the firm, pose the greatest opportunities for the firm to contribute to systems building through their IfSs. The research and managerial implications for IfS of such different degrees of dynamism are considered.


  1. Adams, Richard, Sally Jeanrenaud, John Bessant, David Denyer, and Patrick Overy. 2016. “Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review.” International Journal of Management Reviews 18 (2): 180–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrosini, Véronique, Cliff Bowman, and Nardine Collier. 2009. “Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base.” British Journal of Management 20: S9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben Arfi, Wissal, Lubica Hikkerova, and Jean-Michel Sahut. 2018. “External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 129 (April): 210–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergek, Anna, and Christian Berggren. 2014. “The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: A review of energy and automotive industry studies.” Ecological Economics 106 (October): 112–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bocken, N. M. P., S. W. Short, P. Rana, and S. Evans. 2014. “A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes.” Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bos-Brouwers, Hilke Elke Jacke. 2010. “Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice.” Business Strategy & the Environment 19 (7): 417–35.Google Scholar
  7. Boulding, K. E. 1966. Environmental quality in a growing economy. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  8. Dangelico, Rosa Maria, Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, and Devashish Pujari. 2013. “Developing sustainable new products in the textile and upholstered furniture industries: Role of external integrative capabilities.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 30 (4): 642–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esty, Daniel, C., and Steve Charnovitz. 2012. “Green rules to guide innovation.” Harvard Business Review (March): 120–23.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. 2012. Sustainable growth—For a resource efficient, greener and more competitive economy.
  11. Forrester, Jay Wright. 1968. Principles of systems. Pegasus Communications.Google Scholar
  12. Franceschini, Simone, Mads Borup, and Jesús Rosales-Carreón. 2018. “Future indoor light and associated energy consumption based on professionals’ visions: A practice-and network-oriented analysis.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 129: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fussler, Claude, and Peter James. 1996. Driving eco-innovation: A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability. London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Geels, Frank W., and Johan Schot. 2007. “Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways.” Research Policy 36 (3): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geissdoerfer, Martin, Paulo Savaget, Nancy M. P. Bocken, and Erik Jan Hultink. 2017. “The circular economy a new sustainability paradigm?” Journal of Cleaner Production 143 (February): 757–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gioia, Dennis A., Kevin G. Corley, and Aimee L. Hamilton. 2012. “Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology.” Organizational Research Methods, July. Scholar
  17. Goodman, Jennifer, Angelina Korsunova, and Minna Halme. 2017. “Our collaborative future: Activities and roles of stakeholders in sustainability-oriented innovation.” Business Strategy and the Environment, January.Google Scholar
  18. Gresov, Christopher, and Robert Drazin. 1997. “Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design.” Academy of Management Review 22 (2): 403–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen, Erik G., Friedrich Grosse-Dunker, and Ralf Reichwald. 2009. “Sustainability innovation cube—A framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations.” International Journal of Innovation Management 13 (4): 683–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horbach, Jens, Christian Rammer, and Klaus Rennings. 2012. “Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull.” Ecological Economics 78 (June): 112–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Inigo, Edurne A., and Laura Albareda. 2016. “Understanding sustainable innovation as a complex adaptive system: A systemic approach to the firm.” Journal of Cleaner Production 126: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jay, Jason, and Marine Gerand. 2015. “Accelerating the theory and practice of sustainability-oriented innovation.” Mit Sloan School Working Paper 5: 148–15.Google Scholar
  23. Keskin, Duygu, Jan Carel Diehl, and Nelliene Molenaar. 2013. “Innovation process of new ventures driven by sustainability.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Sustainable Innovation and Business Models, 45 (April): 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loorbach, Derk, and Katinka Wijsman. 2013. “Business transition management: Exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Sustainable Innovation and Business Models, 45 (April): 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lüdeke-Freund, F., L. Massa, N. Bocken, A. Brent, and J. Musango. 2016. “Business models for shared value: Main report.” Network for Business Sustainability South Africa.
  26. Maletič, Matjaž, Damjan Maletič, and Boštjan Gomišček. 2018. “The role of contingency factors on the relationship between sustainability practices and organizational performance.” Journal of Cleaner Production 171 Supplement C: 423–33.Google Scholar
  27. McDowall, Will, Yong Geng, Beijia Huang, Eva Barteková, Raimund Bleischwitz, Serdar Türkeli, René Kemp, and Teresa Doménech. 2017. “Circular economy policies in China and Europe.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (3): 651–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens. 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  29. Miao, Qing, and David Popp. 2014. “Necessity as the mother of invention: Innovative responses to natural disasters.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 68 (1): 280–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulgan, Geoff, Simon Tucker, Ali Rushanara, and Ben Sanders. 2007. “Social innovation: What it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated.” The Young Foundation.Google Scholar
  31. Murray, Alan, Keith Skene, and Kathryn Haynes. 2017. “The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context.” Journal of Business Ethics 140 (3): 369–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nestlé. 2017. “Our commitments”. Last accessed December 14, 2017.
  33. Nidumolu, Ram, C. K. Prahalad, and M. R. Rangaswami. 2009. “Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation.” Harvard Business Review 87 (9): 56–64.Google Scholar
  34. Nidumolu, Ram, Jib Ellison, John Whalen, and Erin Billman. 2014. “The collaboration imperative.” Harvard Business Review 92 (4): 76–84.Google Scholar
  35. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2010. Eco-innovation in industry: Enabling green growth. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Pfitzer, Marc, Valerie Bockstette, and Mike Stamp. 2013. “Innovating for shared value.” Harvard Business Review September: 1–9.Google Scholar
  37. Philips. 2018. “Economic sustainability with circular economy elements.” Accessed July 21, 2018.
  38. Phillips, Wendy, Elizabeth A. Alexander, and Hazel Lee. 2017. “Going it alone won’t work! The relational imperative for social innovation in social enterprises.” Journal of Business Ethics, June: 1–17.Google Scholar
  39. Polit, Denise F., and Cheryl T. Beck. 2010. “Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 47 (11): 1451–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reinecke, Juliane, and Jimmy Donaghey. 2015. “After Rana Plaza: Building coalitional power for labour rights between unions and (consumption-based) social movement organisations.” Organization 22 (5): 720–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rowling, M. 2017. “Wanted: Business partners to build climate resilience.” Thomson Reuters Foundation News 12 November. Accessed December 14, 2017.
  42. Schiederig, Tim, Frank Tietze, and Cornelius Herstatt. 2012. “Green innovation in technology and innovation management—An exploratory literature review.” R&D Management 42 (2): 180–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seebode, Dorothea, Sally Jeanrenaud, and John Bessant. 2012. “Managing innovation for sustainability.” R&D Management 42 (3): 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stubbs, Wendy, and Chris Cocklin. 2008. “Conceptualizing a sustainability business model.” Organization & Environment 21 (2): 103–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Technopolis. 2016. “Regulatory barriers for the circular economy.” Report for the European Commission, Ref. Ares (2016)6309572. Accessed December 14, 2017.
  46. United Nations Environmental Programme, UNEP. 2011. Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. Paris: United Nations.Google Scholar
  47. United Nations, General Assembly. 2015. “Transforming our World: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.” A/RES 70 (1): 1–35.Google Scholar
  48. van Kleef, J. A. G., and N. J. Roome. 2007. “Developing capabilities and competence for sustainable business management as innovation: A research agenda.” Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (1): 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. World Commission on Environment and Development, WCED. 1987. Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press and United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business and Management Organisation, Social Sciences GroupWageningen University & ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations