Online Platforms and the Circular Economy
- 1.5k Downloads
Online platforms have a growing influence on how people interact with the physical world. They organise data streams, economic interactions and social exchanges of their users. Competitive dynamics in this emerging ‘platform society’ revolve around the ability to attract users to a platform, and to collect and analyse data from their interactions to achieve network effects. This chapter is about the roles of online platforms in enabling a more sustainable and circular economy. It identifies and describes three potential roles: they can enable people and organisations to (1) market, (2) operate and (3) co-create products, components and material. The identified roles provide a playground for firms to experiment with online platforms to advance their digital transition towards a circular economy.
- Baines, Timothy, and Howard Lightfoot. 2013. Made to serve. How manufactureres can compete through servitization and product-service systems. NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bakker, Conny, Ruud Balkenende, and Flora Poppelaars. 2018. “Design for product integrity in a circular economy.” In Designing for the circular economy, edited by Martin Charter. London: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group).Google Scholar
- Bonchek, Mark, and Sangeet Paul Choudary. 2013. “Three elements of a successful platform strategy.” Harvard Business Review 92 (1–2).Google Scholar
- Boons, Frank, and Nancy Bocken. 2017. “Assessing the sharing economy: Analyzing ecologies of business models.” In Product lifetimes and the environment 2017—Conference proceedings, 46–50.Google Scholar
- Dolata, Ulrich. 2017. “Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft. Market concentration—Competition—Innovation strategies.” Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies Discussion Paper 2017–01.Google Scholar
- EMF. 2015. “Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe.” Ellen MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
- EMF. 2017. “Google—Partner of the Ellen MacArthur Foundation.” Accessed May 2018. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/about/partners/global/google.
- Galloway, Scott. 2017. The four: The hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
- Hribernik, Karl A., Zied Ghrairi, Carl Hans, and Klaus-dieter Thoben. 2011. “Co-creating the internet of things—First experiences in the participatory design of intelligent products with Arduino.” In 17th International Conference On Concurrent Enterprising (ICE), no. Ice, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Morlet, Andrew, Jocelyn Blériot, Rob Opsomer, Mats Linder, Anina Henggeler, Alix Bluhm, and Andrea Carrera. 2016. “Intelligent assets: Unlocking the circular economy potential.” Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 1–25.Google Scholar
- Osterwalder, Alexander, Yves Pigneur, Greg Bernarda, and Alan Smith. 2014. Value proposition design. Strategyzer Series. NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ries, Eric. 2017. The startup way. New York: Currency, Penguin Random House LLC.Google Scholar
- Stanley, Jeremy. 2017. “Data Science at instacart: Making on-demand profitable.” Accessed May 2018. https://blog.dominodatalab.com/data-science-instacart/.
- Van Alstyne, Marshall W., Geoffrey G. Parker, and Sangeet Paul Choudary. 2016. “Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy.” Harvard Business Review 94 (4): 54–62.Google Scholar
- van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. 2018. The platform society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar