Advertisement

Agnotology and the Criminological Imagination

Chapter
Part of the Critical Criminological Perspectives book series (CCRP)

Abstract

In this chapter we reflect upon the concept of ‘agnotology’ and its usefulness for the expansion of a zemiological criminology. Initially presented as an analytical tool in the fields of science and medicine, agnotology explores the social and political underpinnings of forms of ignorance and their role in both generating and securing acquiescence in mass harms and crimes of the powerful. Typically originating within state-corporate symbioses of ideology, policy and practice, ‘crimes of the powerful’ include harms inflicted through health and safety violations, ‘security’, criminal justice, social and economic policies, war, disaster and environmental destruction. In each case real harms are obscured, denied or otherwise neutralised. Two cases of mass harm are presented here as examples. First, we discuss corporate constructed agnosis over the use of asbestos that has allowed corporations to kill hundreds of thousands yet avoid criminal justice. Second, we reflect on the Holocaust and the role of agnosis in this most extreme form of state-generated harm. Despite its scale, and in contrast with the attention from other disciplines, criminology has remained remarkably taciturn about this crime. We conclude that the central zemiological purpose of an imaginative criminology—the understanding of and struggle against major harm—cannot be undertaken without systematic and rigorous attention to ignorance.

Keywords

Zemiology Agnotology State harm Holocaust Asbestos Ignorance Crimes of the powerful Resistance 

References

  1. Aly, G., & Heim, S. (2002). Architects of Annihilation: Auschwitz and the Logic of Destruction. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  2. Asbestos Nation. (2016). Asbestos Kills 12,000–15,000 People per Year in the US. Asbestos Nation, http://www.asbestosnation.org/facts/asbestos-kills-12000-15000-people-per-year-in-the-u-s/. Accessed 28 June 2016.
  3. Barton, A., Corteen, K., Scott, D., & Whyte, D. (2007). Conclusion: Expanding the Criminological Imagination. In A. Barton, K. Corteen, D. Scott, & D. Whyte (Eds.), Expanding the Criminological Imagination. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, H. S. (1967). Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems, 14(3), 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benedict, S., Shields, L., & O’Donnell, A. J. (2009). Children’s ‘Euthanasia’ in Nazi Germany. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 24(6), 506–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun, L. (2008). Structuring Silence: Asbestos and Biomedical Research in Britain and South Africa. Race and Class, 50(1), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Browning, C. (1992). Ordinary Men: Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  9. Browning, C. (2004). The Origins of the Final Solution. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  10. Bytwerk, R. L. (2004). Bending Spines: The Propagandas of Nazi Germany and the German Democratic Republic. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, S. (2001). States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Conway, E. M., & Oreskes, N. (2010). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  13. Cromwell, D. (2012). Why Are We the Good Guys? Reclaiming Your Mind from the Delusions of Propaganda. Alresford: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, W., & McGoey, L. (2012). Rationalities of Ignorance: On Financial Crisis and the Ambivalence of Neo-liberal Epistemology. Economy and Society, 41(1), 64–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorling, D., Gordon, D., Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Pemberton, S., & Tombs, S. (2008). Criminal Obsessions: Why Harm Matters more than Crime. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
  16. Egilman, D., Fehnel, C., & Rankin-Bohme, S. (2003). Exposing the ‘Myth’ of ABC, ‘Anything But Chrysotile’: A Critique of the Canadian Asbestos Mining Industry and McGill University Chrysotile Studies. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 44, 540–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Egilman, D., Wallace, W., & Hom, C. (2008). Corporate Corruption of Medical Literature: Asbestos Studies Concealed by W. R. Grace and Co. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 6, 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1980). Two Lectures – Lecture One: 7 January 1976. In M. Foucault & C. Gordon (Eds.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interview and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  19. Frailing, K., & Wood-Harper, D. (2017). Towards a Criminology of Disaster: What We Know and What We Need to Find Out. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedlander, H. (1995). The Origins of the Nazi Genocide: From Euthanasia to the Final Solution. London: Chapel and Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Friedlander, H. (2001). The Exclusion and Murder of the Disabled. In R. Gellately & N. Stoltzfus (Eds.), Social Outsiders in Nazi Germany. Woodstock: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Giroux, H. (2014). The Violence of Organised Forgetting. San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
  23. Herf, J. (2006). The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust. London: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hersh, J. (2004). Old Speak/Newspeak of Neoliberalism on Development. Interdisciplinary Journal of International Studies 2, 2(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  25. Hills, B. (2005). The James Hardie Story: Asbestos Victims’ Claims Evaded by Manufacturer. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 11(2), 212–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hillyard, P., & Tombs, S. (2004). Beyond Criminology? In P. Hillyard, S. Tombs, C. Pantazis, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  27. Howell, G., & Miller, R. (2006). Spinning out the Asbestos Agenda: How Big Business Uses Public Relations in Australia. Public Relations Review, 32, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hulsman, L. (1986). Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime. Contemporary Crises, 10(1), 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joshi, T. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2006). Asbestos in Developing Countries: Magnitude of Risk and Its Practical Implications. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 11(1), 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kershaw, I. (2008). Hitler, the Germans and the Final Solution. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kramer, R., Michalowski, R., & Chambliss, W. (2010). Epilogue: Towards a Public Criminology of State Crime. In W. Chambliss, R. Michalowski, & R. Kramer (Eds.), State Crime in the Global Age. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  32. Kwiet, K. (1998). Rehearsing for Murder: The Beginning of the Final Solution in Lithuania in June 1941. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 12(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lawson, T. (2010). Debates on the Holocaust. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Longerich, P. (2010). Holocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lopez-Munoz, F., Alamo, C., Dudley, M., Rubio, G., Garcia-Garcia, P., Molina, J. D., & Okasha, A. (2007). Psychiatry and Political-institutional Abuse from the Historical Perspective: The Lessons of the Nuremberg Trial on their 60th Anniversary. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 31, 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mathiesen, T. (2004). Silently Silenced: Essays on the Creation of Acquiescence in Modern Society. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
  37. McGoey, L. (2012). Strategic Unknowns: Towards a Sociology of Ignorance. Economy and Society, 41(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McSweeney, B. (2009). The Roles of Financial Asset Market Failure Denial and the Economic Crisis: Reflections on Accounting and Financial Theories and Practices. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 835–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mirowski, P. (2014). Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  41. Moerman, L., & Van der Laan, S. (2007). Pursuing Shareholder Value: The Rhetoric of James Hardie. Accounting Forum, 31, 354–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Orth, K. (2000). The Concentration Camp SS as a Functional Elite. In U. Herbert & G. Aly (Eds.), National Socialist Extermination Policies: Contemporary German Perspectives. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  43. Panitch, L., & Leys, C. (2005). Telling the Truth. The Socialist Register. London: The Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rafter, N. (2008). Criminology’s Darkest Hour: Biocriminology in Nazi Germany. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41(2), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smithson, M. (1990). Ignorance and Disasters. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 8(3), 207–235.Google Scholar
  46. Tracy, J. R. (2012). Covering ‘Financial Terrorism’: The Greek Debt Crisis in US News Media. Journalism Practice, 6(4), 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tweedale, G., & Jeremy, D. J. (2006). Compensating the Workers: Industrial Injury and Compensation in the British Asbestos Industry, 1930s–60s. Business History, 41(2), 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tweedale, G., & Warren, R. (2004). Chapter 11 and Asbestos: Encouraging Private Enterprise or Conspiring to Avoid Liability. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wachsmann, N. (2015). KL: A History of the Nazi Concentration Camps. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
  50. Walters, R. (2008). Government Manipulation of Criminological Knowledge and Policies of Deceit. In T. Hope & R. Walters (Eds.), Critical Thinking About the Uses of Research. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
  51. Warren, R. C. (2002). The Responsible Shareholder: A Case Study. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(1), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watkins, J., Wulaningsih, W., Da Zhou, C., Marshall, D. C., Sylianteng, G. D. C., Dela Rosa, P. G., Maguel, V. A., Raine, R., King, L. P., & Maruthappu, M. (2017). Effects of Health and Social Care Spending Constraints on Mortality in England: A Time Trend Analysis. BMJ Open, 7, e017722. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weeks, J. (2014). Economics of the 1%: How Mainstream Economics Serves the Rich, Obscures Reality and Distorts Policy. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  54. Welzer, H. (2008). On Killing and Morality: How Normal People Become Mass Murderers. In O. Jensen & C. W. Szejmann (Eds.), Ordinary People as Mass Murderers (pp. 165–184). London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wenger, M. G. (1997). Some Analytical Implications of the Statutory Construction of Genocide. Critical Sociology, 23, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Law and CriminologyEdge Hill UniversityOrmskirkUK
  2. 2.Department of Social and Political ScienceUniversity of ChesterChesterUK

Personalised recommendations