Skip to main content

The Study of Historical Films as Adaptation: Some Critical Reflections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
True Event Adaptation

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture ((PSADVC))

  • 601 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter suggests that the study of historical film studies and literary film adaptations shows similarities, which warrant exchanging concepts and methods to benefit both disciplines. Hence, section “Historical Film Studies: A Brief Introduction” sketches a brief introduction to the field of historical film studies. Section “The Adaptation as End-Product” looks into how literary or historical film adaptations, understood as end-products, may involve highlighting or, rather, hiding adaptational tracks. Section “Adaptation as a Process” focuses on the adaptation process and discusses pros and cons of distinguishing between a selection policy and an actual adaptation policy. Finally, section “Systemic Relations Between Process and End-Product” discusses some research questions dealing with systemic relations that may obtain between the presentation and perception of a set of literary or historical film adaptations, understood as end-products, and features of their adaptational processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agger, Gunhild. “The Role of History in Bestseller and Blockbuster Culture.” Akademisk Kvarter, vol. 7, 2013: pp. 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, Bettina, et al., eds. Zeitgeschichte - Medien - Historische Bildung. V&R Unipress, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, Dudley. Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Adapting Cinema to History: A Revolution in the Making.” A Companion to Literature and Film, Blackwell, 2004: pp. 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, Lester E. From Book to Film: A Comparative Analysis of the Content of Selected Novels and the Motion Pictures Based Upon Them. University of Chicago, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “From Book to Film: Mass Appeals.” Hollywood Quarterly, vol. 5, 1951: pp. 334–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. “From Book to Film: Summary.” The Quarterly of Film, Radio and Television, vol. 6, 1952: pp. 258–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Simon. Truth: A Guide for the Perplexed. Penguin Books, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Brian. On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition and Fiction. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broich, Ulrich. “Formen Der Markierung von Intertextualität.” Intertextualität: Formen, Funktionen, Anglistische Fallstudien, Niemeyer Verlag, 1985: pp. 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell, William S. “Paying for the Damage: The Quiet American Revisited.” History & Film, vol. 36, no. 2, 2006: pp. 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, Claudia. “The Story You Are About to Hear Is True”: Dragnet, Transmedia Storytelling, and the Power of the Postwar Police Procedural. Yale University, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Kenneth M. America on Film: Hollywood and American History. Continuum, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Noël. “On the Narrative Connection.” New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, State University of New York Press, 2001: pp. 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattrysse, Patrick. “‘The Naked City’ and the Semi-Documentary.” Image-Reality-Spectator: Essays on Documentary Film and Television, ACCO, 1989: pp. 132–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. L’Adaptation filmique de textes littéraires: Le film noir américain. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1990, http://independent.academia.edu/CattryssePatrick/Books.

  • ———. “Vertaling, Adaptatie en Intertekstualiteit.” Communicatie, vol. 21, no. 1, 1991: pp. 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “De Semi-Documentaire: Een Analyse in Termen van Normen en Systemen.” Communicatie, vol. 20, no. 3, 1991 [1990]: pp. 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Pour une théorie de l’adaptation filmique: Le film noir américain. Peter Lang International Academic Publishers, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Pour une Approche Intersystémique du Cinéma.” Towards a Pragmatics of the Audio-Visual: Theory and History, vol. 1, Nodus Publikationen, 1994: pp. 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Simone Murray, The Adaptation Industry: The Cultural Economy of Contemporary Literary Adaptation. Book Review.” Translation: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 2012, http://translation.fusp.it/reviews/the-adaptation-industry-the-cultural-economy-of-contemporary-literary-adaptation.

  • ———. Descriptive Adaptation Studies: Epistemological and Methodological Issues. Garant Publishers, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “An Evolutionary View of Cultural Adaptation: Some Considerations.” The Routledge Companion to Adaptation, Routledge, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, Adam. Digital Games as History. Routledge, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagmar, Brunow. Remediating Transcultural Memory. Walter de Gruyter, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, David. “Fictional Truth and Fictional Authors.” British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 36, no. 1, 1996: pp. 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, Anirudh. “Films as Historical Sources or Alternative History.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 39, no. 40, 2004: pp. 4455–4459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Andrew B. Remaking the Middle Ages: The Methods of Cinema and History in Portraying the Medieval World. McFarland & Co., 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Even-Zohar, Itamar. “The Position of Translated Literature Within the Literary Polysystem.” Literature and Translation: New Perspectives in Literary Studies, ACCO, 1978: pp. 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falbe-Hansen, Rasmus. “The Filmmaker as Historian.” P.O.V.A Danish Journal of Film Studies, vol. 16, 2003: pp. 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Carpintero, Manuel. “Fictional Entities, Theoretical Models and Figurative Truth.” Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science, Springer, 2010: pp. 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, Michael S. Who’s in Charge? Free Will and the Science of the Brain. Harper Collins Books, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschall, Jonathan. The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human. Mariner Books Edition, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Graham. The Quiet American. Vintage Books, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Ways of Escape. Vintage Books, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guynn, William. Writing History in Film. Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, David. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. University of Nebraska Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes-Warrington, Marnie. History Goes to the Movies: Studying History on Film. New Edition, Routledge, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. The History on Film Reader. Routledge, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroon, Frederick. “The Fiction of Creationism.” Truth in Fiction. De Gruyter, 2013: pp. 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroon, Frederick, and Alberto Voltolini. “Fiction.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), 2011, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/fiction.

  • Krutnik, Frank. In a Lonely Street: Film Noir, Genre, Masculinity. Routledge, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laass, Eva. Broken Taboos, Subjective Truths: Forms and Functions of Unreliable Narration in Contemporary American Cinema—A Contribution to Film Narratology. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, William. “A Reappraisal of the Semi-Documentary in Hollywood, 1945–1948.” Velvet Light Trap, vol. 20, 1983: pp. 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, Thomas. Film Adaptation & Its Discontents: From Gone with the Wind to the Passion of the Christ. John Hopkins University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Chris. De Constructie van het Verleden: Een Inleiding in de Theorie van de Geschiedenis. Meppel, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mico, Ted, et al., eds. Past Imperfect: History According to the Movies. Henry Holt & Co., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minda, John Paul. The Psychology of Thinking: Reasoning, Decision-Making & Problem-Solving. Sage, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Simone. The Adaptation Industry: The Cultural Economy of Contemporary Literary Adaptation. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit, Winfried, et al., eds. Film und Geschichte: Produktion und Erfahrung von Geschichte Durch Bewegtbild und Ton. Bertz-Fischer Verlag, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, James. Living to Tell About It: A Rhetoric of Ethics and Character Narration. Cornell University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, James, and Mary Patricia Martin. “The Lessons of ‘Weymouth’: Homodiegesis, Unreliability, Ethics, and The Remains of the Day.” Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis, Ohio State University Press, 1999: pp. 88–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Clarendon Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raw, Laurence, and Defne Ersin Tutan, eds. The Adaptation of History: Essays on Ways of Telling the Past. McFarland, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, Robert A. Visions of the Past: The Challenge of Film to Our Idea of History. Harvard University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. History on Film/Film on History. Pearson Education Ltd., 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Historian in Spite of Myself.” Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, vol. 11, no. 4, 2007: pp. 589–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. History on Film/Film on History, 2nd ed. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, Jean-Marie. Pourquoi la Fiction? Editions du Seuil, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symmons, Tom. The New Hollywood Historical Film: 1967–78. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toplin, Robert B. History by Hollywood: The Use and Abuse of the American Past. University of Illinois Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treacey, Mia E. M. Reframing the Past: History, Film and Television. Routledge, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trochim, William M. K. “Positivism and Post-Positivism.” Research Methods Knowledge Base, 2006: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasey, Ruth. The World According to Hollywood, 1918–1939. University of Exeter Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Cattrysse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cattrysse, P. (2018). The Study of Historical Films as Adaptation: Some Critical Reflections. In: Thornley, D. (eds) True Event Adaptation. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97322-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics