Advertisement

The Study of Historical Films as Adaptation: Some Critical Reflections

  • Patrick CattrysseEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture book series (PSADVC)

Abstract

This chapter suggests that the study of historical film studies and literary film adaptations shows similarities, which warrant exchanging concepts and methods to benefit both disciplines. Hence, section “Historical Film Studies: A Brief Introduction” sketches a brief introduction to the field of historical film studies. Section “The Adaptation as End-Product” looks into how literary or historical film adaptations, understood as end-products, may involve highlighting or, rather, hiding adaptational tracks. Section “Adaptation as a Process” focuses on the adaptation process and discusses pros and cons of distinguishing between a selection policy and an actual adaptation policy. Finally, section “Systemic Relations Between Process and End-Product” discusses some research questions dealing with systemic relations that may obtain between the presentation and perception of a set of literary or historical film adaptations, understood as end-products, and features of their adaptational processes.

Keywords

Historical film studies Film adaptation studies Fact and fiction Truth and fidelity 

References

  1. Agger, Gunhild. “The Role of History in Bestseller and Blockbuster Culture.” Akademisk Kvarter, vol. 7, 2013: pp. 299–316.Google Scholar
  2. Alavi, Bettina, et al., eds. Zeitgeschichte - Medien - Historische Bildung. V&R Unipress, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. Andrew, Dudley. Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. ———. “Adapting Cinema to History: A Revolution in the Making.” A Companion to Literature and Film, Blackwell, 2004: pp. 189–204.Google Scholar
  5. Asheim, Lester E. From Book to Film: A Comparative Analysis of the Content of Selected Novels and the Motion Pictures Based Upon Them. University of Chicago, 1949.Google Scholar
  6. ———. “From Book to Film: Mass Appeals.” Hollywood Quarterly, vol. 5, 1951: pp. 334–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. “From Book to Film: Summary.” The Quarterly of Film, Radio and Television, vol. 6, 1952: pp. 258–273.Google Scholar
  8. Blackburn, Simon. Truth: A Guide for the Perplexed. Penguin Books, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Boyd, Brian. On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition and Fiction. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. Broich, Ulrich. “Formen Der Markierung von Intertextualität.” Intertextualität: Formen, Funktionen, Anglistische Fallstudien, Niemeyer Verlag, 1985: pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
  11. Bushnell, William S. “Paying for the Damage: The Quiet American Revisited.” History & Film, vol. 36, no. 2, 2006: pp. 38–44.Google Scholar
  12. Calhoun, Claudia. “The Story You Are About to Hear Is True”: Dragnet, Transmedia Storytelling, and the Power of the Postwar Police Procedural. Yale University, 2014.Google Scholar
  13. Cameron, Kenneth M. America on Film: Hollywood and American History. Continuum, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, Noël. “On the Narrative Connection.” New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, State University of New York Press, 2001: pp. 21–41.Google Scholar
  15. Cattrysse, Patrick. “‘The Naked City’ and the Semi-Documentary.” Image-Reality-Spectator: Essays on Documentary Film and Television, ACCO, 1989: pp. 132–154.Google Scholar
  16. ———. L’Adaptation filmique de textes littéraires: Le film noir américain. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1990, http://independent.academia.edu/CattryssePatrick/Books.
  17. ———. “Vertaling, Adaptatie en Intertekstualiteit.” Communicatie, vol. 21, no. 1, 1991: pp. 38–47.Google Scholar
  18. ———. “De Semi-Documentaire: Een Analyse in Termen van Normen en Systemen.” Communicatie, vol. 20, no. 3, 1991 [1990]: pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
  19. ———. Pour une théorie de l’adaptation filmique: Le film noir américain. Peter Lang International Academic Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
  20. ———. “Pour une Approche Intersystémique du Cinéma.” Towards a Pragmatics of the Audio-Visual: Theory and History, vol. 1, Nodus Publikationen, 1994: pp. 61–75.Google Scholar
  21. ———. “Simone Murray, The Adaptation Industry: The Cultural Economy of Contemporary Literary Adaptation. Book Review.” Translation: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 2012, http://translation.fusp.it/reviews/the-adaptation-industry-the-cultural-economy-of-contemporary-literary-adaptation.
  22. ———. Descriptive Adaptation Studies: Epistemological and Methodological Issues. Garant Publishers, 2014.Google Scholar
  23. ———. “An Evolutionary View of Cultural Adaptation: Some Considerations.” The Routledge Companion to Adaptation, Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
  24. Chapman, Adam. Digital Games as History. Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
  25. Dagmar, Brunow. Remediating Transcultural Memory. Walter de Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar
  26. Davis, David. “Fictional Truth and Fictional Authors.” British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 36, no. 1, 1996: pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
  27. Deshpande, Anirudh. “Films as Historical Sources or Alternative History.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 39, no. 40, 2004: pp. 4455–4459.Google Scholar
  28. Elliott, Andrew B. Remaking the Middle Ages: The Methods of Cinema and History in Portraying the Medieval World. McFarland & Co., 2011.Google Scholar
  29. Even-Zohar, Itamar. “The Position of Translated Literature Within the Literary Polysystem.” Literature and Translation: New Perspectives in Literary Studies, ACCO, 1978: pp. 117–127.Google Scholar
  30. Falbe-Hansen, Rasmus. “The Filmmaker as Historian.” P.O.V.A Danish Journal of Film Studies, vol. 16, 2003: pp. 109–117.Google Scholar
  31. García-Carpintero, Manuel. “Fictional Entities, Theoretical Models and Figurative Truth.” Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science, Springer, 2010: pp. 139–168.Google Scholar
  32. Gazzaniga, Michael S. Who’s in Charge? Free Will and the Science of the Brain. Harper Collins Books, 2011.Google Scholar
  33. Gottschall, Jonathan. The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human. Mariner Books Edition, 2013.Google Scholar
  34. Greene, Graham. The Quiet American. Vintage Books, 1955.Google Scholar
  35. ———. Ways of Escape. Vintage Books, 2002.Google Scholar
  36. Guynn, William. Writing History in Film. Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
  37. Herman, David. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. University of Nebraska Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  38. Hughes-Warrington, Marnie. History Goes to the Movies: Studying History on Film. New Edition, Routledge, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———, ed. The History on Film Reader. Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
  40. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books, 2011.Google Scholar
  41. Kroon, Frederick. “The Fiction of Creationism.” Truth in Fiction. De Gruyter, 2013: pp. 203–222.Google Scholar
  42. Kroon, Frederick, and Alberto Voltolini. “Fiction.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), 2011, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/fiction.
  43. Krutnik, Frank. In a Lonely Street: Film Noir, Genre, Masculinity. Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
  44. Laass, Eva. Broken Taboos, Subjective Truths: Forms and Functions of Unreliable Narration in Contemporary American Cinema—A Contribution to Film Narratology. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2008.Google Scholar
  45. Lafferty, William. “A Reappraisal of the Semi-Documentary in Hollywood, 1945–1948.” Velvet Light Trap, vol. 20, 1983: pp. 22–26.Google Scholar
  46. Leitch, Thomas. Film Adaptation & Its Discontents: From Gone with the Wind to the Passion of the Christ. John Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  47. Lorenz, Chris. De Constructie van het Verleden: Een Inleiding in de Theorie van de Geschiedenis. Meppel, 1987.Google Scholar
  48. Mico, Ted, et al., eds. Past Imperfect: History According to the Movies. Henry Holt & Co., 1996.Google Scholar
  49. Minda, John Paul. The Psychology of Thinking: Reasoning, Decision-Making & Problem-Solving. Sage, 2015.Google Scholar
  50. Murray, Simone. The Adaptation Industry: The Cultural Economy of Contemporary Literary Adaptation. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2012.Google Scholar
  51. Pauleit, Winfried, et al., eds. Film und Geschichte: Produktion und Erfahrung von Geschichte Durch Bewegtbild und Ton. Bertz-Fischer Verlag, 2015.Google Scholar
  52. Phelan, James. Living to Tell About It: A Rhetoric of Ethics and Character Narration. Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  53. Phelan, James, and Mary Patricia Martin. “The Lessons of ‘Weymouth’: Homodiegesis, Unreliability, Ethics, and The Remains of the Day.” Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis, Ohio State University Press, 1999: pp. 88–109.Google Scholar
  54. Popper, Karl R. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  55. Raw, Laurence, and Defne Ersin Tutan, eds. The Adaptation of History: Essays on Ways of Telling the Past. McFarland, 2013.Google Scholar
  56. Rosenstone, Robert A. Visions of the Past: The Challenge of Film to Our Idea of History. Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  57. ———. History on Film/Film on History. Pearson Education Ltd., 2006.Google Scholar
  58. ———. “Historian in Spite of Myself.” Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, vol. 11, no. 4, 2007: pp. 589–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. ———. History on Film/Film on History, 2nd ed. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2013.Google Scholar
  60. Schaeffer, Jean-Marie. Pourquoi la Fiction? Editions du Seuil, 1999.Google Scholar
  61. Symmons, Tom. The New Hollywood Historical Film: 1967–78. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar
  62. Toplin, Robert B. History by Hollywood: The Use and Abuse of the American Past. University of Illinois Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  63. Treacey, Mia E. M. Reframing the Past: History, Film and Television. Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
  64. Trochim, William M. K. “Positivism and Post-Positivism.” Research Methods Knowledge Base, 2006: n.p.Google Scholar
  65. Vasey, Ruth. The World According to Hollywood, 1918–1939. University of Exeter Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiteit AntwerpenAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Emerson College European CenterWellThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations