Advertisement

Category I: Nondiagnostic

Chapter
  • 516 Downloads

Abstract

The Papanicolaou Society for Cytopathology guidelines for respiratory cytology recommend six categories with strict definitions, criteria, and associated malignancy risks. The nondiagnostic category is the first of these and comprises a group of specimens assigned to this category either because they are qualitatively or quantitatively inadequate to render a specific diagnosis or display such significant artifactual change that an accurate diagnosis cannot be rendered. Precise adequacy criteria vary depending on specimen type but for certain specimen types remain elusive. Adequacy assessment for sputum cytology depends on the presence of deep cough pigment-laden macrophages or a minimum volume of sputum necessary to prepare two to four slides. Clearly the number of cases assigned to the nondiagnostic category will vary depending on the criterion utilized and neither guarantees adequate sampling of a nodule detected on imaging studies. Criteria are best developed for EBUS (endobronchial ultrasound guided) fine-needle aspirates of well-defined pulmonary nodules. Cellularity alone is not a criterion for adequacy as some acellular specimens composed predominately of stoma or amyloid are diagnostic, while highly cellular specimens containing only benign respiratory epithelium in the presence of a distinct pulmonary nodule are judged nondiagnostic.

Definitionally, a nondiagnostic specimen is one which provides no useful diagnostic information about the pulmonary nodule, cyst, or mass lesion seen on imaging studies. In a given specimen, any degree of cellular atypia which is recognized as beyond that clearly consistent with changes associated with inflammation or repair excludes an interpretation of nondiagnostic for that sample.

Nondiagnostic specimens include those that contain only normal ciliated respiratory epithelium, non-ciliated bronchiolar epithelium, pneumocytes, and/or macrophages when a distinct pulmonary nodule is identified on imaging studies.

Nondiagnostic aspirates may also contain structures present deeper in the bronchial wall, for example, cartilage. Non-specific negative findings do not exclude a malignancy.

Specimens containing only normal-appearing ciliated respiratory epithelium, non-ciliated bronchiolar epithelium, and pneumocytes may be considered adequate only when a vague ill-defined abnormality or consolidation is detected on imaging studies.

Clinical correlation and correlation with imaging findings are a necessary component of adequacy assessment.

Keywords

Adequacy Nondiagnostic Sputum EBUS-FNA Sampling Imaging Clinical Cytology Respiratory Pulmonary Malignancy risk 

References

  1. 1.
    Koss LG. Histology and cytology of the normal respiratory tract. In: Koss LG, editor. Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic basis. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1979;549.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenburg SD. Recent advances in pulmonary cytopathology. Hum Pathol. 1983;14(10):901–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi YD, Han CW, Kim JH, Oh IJ, Lee JS, Nam JH, Juhng SW, Park CS. Effectiveness of sputum cytology using ThinPrep method for evaluation of lung cancer. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36(3):167–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alsharif M, Andrade RS, Groth SS, Stelow EB, Pambuccian SE. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration: the University of Minnesota experience with emphasis on usefulness, adequacy assessment, and diagnostic difficulties. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130(3):434–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nayak A, Sugrue C, Koenig S, Wasserman PG, Hoda S, Morgenstern NJ. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirated (EBUS-TBNA): a proposal for on-site adequacy criteria. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;40(2):128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cameron SE, Andrade RS, Panbuccian SE. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration cytology: a state of the art review. Cytopathology. 2010;21(1):6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Layfield LJ, Coogan A, Johnston WW, Patz EF. Transthoracic fine needle aspiration biopsy. Sensitivity in relation to guidance technique and lesion size and location. Acta Cytol. 1996;40(4):687–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levine MS, Weiss JM, Harrell JH, Cameron TJ, Moser KM. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy following negative fiberoptic bronchoscopy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest. 1988;93(6):1152–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Layfield LJ, Dodd L, Witt B. Malignancy risk for the categories: non-diagnostic, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant used in the categorization of endobronchial ultrasound guided fine needle aspirates of pulmonary nodules. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43(11):892–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pathology and Anatomical SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineHospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations