Skip to main content

Minority Co-production: Insights from MEDICI

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave European Film and Media Studies ((PEFMS))

Abstract

Co-production implies that there is a majority producer who has initiated the project and one or several minority co-producers who are involved at a later stage. In this chapter, I would like to share some of the insights that have arisen from MEDICI workshops in relation to “minority co-production”, a particular type of official co-production where the financial and creative contribution of one partner is significantly less than another. As the chapter will show, to be a minority co-producer involves certain risks but also numerous advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    MEDICI workshops are organised by FOCAL, a Swiss organisation whose main objective is to set up professional training workshops for the Swiss and international audiovisual industry (www.focal.ch).

  2. 2.

    For the full text of the European Convention on Cinematographic Co-production, see https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/220

  3. 3.

    A new European Convention on Co-production is in the process of being approved by the signatory states to have a 5% minimum contribution instead of the current 10% (for a multilateral co-production) and 20% (for a bilateral co-production).

  4. 4.

    The exceptions to this are financial co-productions that do not require the creative elements of a project to be shared. In the case of a financial co-production, the role of the minority co-producer is limited to a monetary contribution.

  5. 5.

    This is generally in proportion to their share of the co-production.

  6. 6.

    Tax credits, tax shelters and cash rebates are considered “production incentives”.

  7. 7.

    The Nordic countries (Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland and Finland) are the exception.

  8. 8.

    See Danish Film Institute website: https://www.dfi.dk/en/english/funding/minor-coproduction-feature-films.

  9. 9.

    Criteria such as national distributor confirmed, percentage of funding achieved, minimum number of days shooting, local expenditure and so on.

  10. 10.

    Project financing by regional funds is mainly based on the amount of the project’s production expenditure on its territory.

  11. 11.

    For example, in order to receive funding of €100,000, production expenditure in the region for the project must be equal to €400,000.

  12. 12.

    For information about production incentives in individual countries, see the database of the Online International Film Financing platform at www.olffi.com.

  13. 13.

    A mini-treaty is an agreement between two funds of different nationalities who want to allocate a specific budget for projects co-produced by both countries. This financial support is selective, and complementary to other public funding available in the two countries concerned.

  14. 14.

    For information about co-development funds in individual countries, see the database of the Online International Film Financing platform at www.olffi.com.

  15. 15.

    EFADs Vision working document on future of film: Towards a Strong, Sustainable and Dynamic European Film Industry and Culture in 2030”. http://www.efads.eu/common-positions/efads-vision-working-document-on-future-of-film-towards-a-strong-sustainable-and-dynamic-european-film-industry-and-culture-in-2030.html/ Accessed 20 November 2018.

References

  • Kanzler, Martin, and Julio Talavera. 2017. Focus 2017: World Film Market Trends. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitric, Petar, and Joelle Levie. 2013. MEDICI Second Workshop Report: Financing Strategies. Annual Report, FOCAL. Lozanne: FOCAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. MEDICI Fifth Workshop Report: International Co-productions, Development, Gender and Quotas. Annual Report, FOCAL. Lozanne: FOCAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. MEDICI Sixth workshop Report: The Development of Content: Challenges and Opportunities—Public Funds as Pawns or Players. Annual Report, FOCAL. Lozanne: FOCAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsberg, Jonathan, and Andrew Barnes. 2014. Impact Analysis of Fiscal Incentive Schemes Supporting Film and Audiovisual Production in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Levie, J. (2018). Minority Co-production: Insights from MEDICI. In: Hammett-Jamart, J., Mitric, P., Novrup Redvall, E. (eds) European Film and Television Co-production. Palgrave European Film and Media Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97157-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics