Beyond the Inner Daguerreotype



The ontological character of its own movement remains obscure to thought, a condition that needs to be remedied in any serious attempt to think. From multiple angles we have looked at the pre-occupations of thought as it refuses to think, that is, refuses to think what most needs to be thought about, which is its own condition of possibility. Given this backdrop, we obtain some deductions in the form of a propositional arrangement, a deliberately chosen format, that allows us to survey what thinking can disclose to itself about itself. The inner daguerreotype is suggestive of the uncritical self-image of thought that is built up through memory accretions. So long as thought remains invested in the daguerreotype (its inner picture of itself), it remains divided against itself, incapable of truly thinking—the self-image is a schism in thought maintained through and by division. By means of the propositions in this chapter the attempt is to deconstruct the image and go beyond the daguerreotype so that new light is thrown on the operation of thought. We begin with simple observations drawing our means from Heidegger, Schelling, Goethe, and Heraclitus.


  1. Adorno, Theodor. Mimima Moralia: Notes from the Damaged Life. London: The New Left Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  2. Agamben, Giorgio. The Man Without Content. Translated by Georgia Albert. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. Agamben, Giorgio. The Time That Remains: A Commentary on Paul’s Letter to the Romans. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Agamben, Giorgio. What Is an Apparatus and Other Essays. Translated by David Kishik. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. Translated by Harry Zohn, New York: Schocken Books, 1969.Google Scholar
  6. Camus, Albert. The Rebel. Translated by Anthony Bower. New York: Knopf, 1956.Google Scholar
  7. Fisher, Ernst. The Necessity of Art: A Marxist Approach. Translated by Anna Bostock. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books, 1963.Google Scholar
  8. Heller-Roazen, Daniel. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy, edited by Giorgio Agamben. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  9. Illich, Ivan. The Rivers North of the Future: The Testament of Ivan Illich. Toronto: House of Anansi Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  10. Marx, Karl. Early Writings. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. New York: Penguin Books, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Azim Premji UniversityBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations