Among the “Presocratics”: Heraclitus



With an astonishing economy of language, surrounded by a palpable silence, Heraclitus surgically cuts through the miasma of thought, guiding thinking past the quagmire of its own making. The vast empire of thought is brushed aside by a few sharp insights running like scalpel through tissue. It brings us to the point in our journey where we are enabled to make a few deductions that follow in the ensuing chapter. Pitting the intentionality of thought against an imperturbable Innocence Heraclitus brings thinking to its knees. Portraying Nature as “playing dice,” Heraclitus makes nonsense of the idea of cultural progress. Observing that thought looks everywhere but into itself, Heraclitus opens the main ontological window away from cultural constructs and devious arguments. Demanding that we remain prepared and open to the unexpected, Heraclitus shows us the creative abyss that awaits the seeker of essence. And finally, denying that human nature can, by itself, ever apprehend truth, Heraclitus makes the all-important gesture toward a divine nature that encompasses all. Thus thinking is forced to contemplate necessity.


beingBeing thinkingThinking essenceEssence ideaIdea wisdomWisdom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Chitwood, Ava. Death by Philosophy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  2. Davidson, Andrew. The Love of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy for Theologians. New York: SCM Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Deleuze, Gilles. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. Translated by Robert Hurley. San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. Harris, William. Heraclitus: The Complete Fragments. Vermont: Middlebury College, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, Martin. What Is Called Thinking. Translated by Fred D. Wieck and J. Glenn Gray. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.Google Scholar
  6. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Translated by J.C. Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  7. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1929.Google Scholar
  8. Parmenides. “On Nature.” In Early Greek Philosophy, 3rd ed., edited by John Burnet. London: A & C Black, 1920.Google Scholar
  9. Patrick, G.T.W. Fragments Attributed to Heraclitus. Baltimore: N. Murray, 1889.Google Scholar
  10. Spinoza, Benedict de. The Ethics. Edited and translated by James Gutmann. New York: Hafner Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  11. Spinoza, Benedict de. “Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect.” In The Collected Works of Spinoza, vol. I, edited and translated by Edwin Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Azim Premji UniversityBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations