Skip to main content

Robotic Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion for Bladder Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • 1299 Accesses

Abstract

Robotic radical cystectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection with intracorporeal urinary diversion , is increasingly being applied in the surgical management of bladder cancer. Published literature suggests that this approach has similar short- and midterm oncological outcomes compared to open surgery. Robotic approach seems to have an advantage in terms of estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, and complications. Operative time, lymph node yield, and surgical margins seem to be similar. In the most experienced robotic centers, promising functional outcomes including urinary continence and erectile function have been reported. However, the numbers of patients included in the robotic series are limited in the published literature, and long-term data is not available yet. Therefore, presently it is not easy to make strict conclusions about this approach. In this chapter, an overview of the literature on this subject is summarized, and the surgical technique applied is presented including preoperative planning, setup, and postoperative care.

All of the surgical figures included in this chapter are obtained from Prof. Canda’s own robotic surgical cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Huang GJ, Stein JP. Open radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy remains the treatment of choice for invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17(5):369–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liss MA, Kader AK. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: history, techniques and outcomes. World J Urol. 2013;31(3):489–97.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayn MH, Hussain A, Mansour AM, et al. The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins JW, Tyritzis S, Nyberg T, Schumacher MC, Laurin O, Adding C, Jonsson M, Khazaeli D, Steineck G, Wiklund P, Hosseini A. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal neobladder - what is the effect of the learning curve on outcomes? BJU Int. 2014;113(1):100–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Herr H, Lee C, Chang S, Lerner S. Bladder Cancer Collaborative Group. Standardization of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: a collaborative group report. J Urol. 2004;171(5):1823–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Skinner EC, Stein JP, Skinner DG. Surgical benchmarks for the treatment of invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2007;25(1):66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stein JP, Cai J, Groshen S, Skinner DG. Risk factors for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases following radical cystectomy with en bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy: concept of lymph node density. J Urol. 2003;170(1):35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leissner J, Hohenfellner R, Thüroff JW, Wolf HK. Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; significance for staging and prognosis. BJU Int. 2000;85(7):817–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herr HW, Faulkner JR, Grossman HB, et al. Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(14):2781–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Canda AE, Atmaca AF, Arslan ME, Keske M, Cakici OU, Cakmak S, Kamaci D, Urer E. Robotic radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: is it the future? Open Access Surgery. 2014;7:47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins JW, Hosseini A, Adding C, Nyberg T, Koupparis A, Rowe E, Perry M, Issa R, Schumacher MC, Wijburg C, Canda AE, Balbay MD, Decaestecker K, Schwentner C, Stenzl A, Edeling S, Pokupić S, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Wiklund PN. Early recurrence patterns following totally Intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the EAU robotic urology section (ERUS) scientific working group. Eur Urol. 2017;71(5):723–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussein AA, Saar M, May PR, Wijburg CJ, Richstone L, Wagner A, Wilson T, Yuh B, Redorta JP, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, Menon M, Peabody JO, Hosseini A, Gaboardi F, Mottrie A, Rha KH, Hemal A, Stockle M, Kelly J, Maatman TJ, Canda AE, Wiklund P, Guru KA. Collaborators. Early oncologic failure after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1427–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen DP, Al Hussein A Awamlh B, O'Malley P, Khan F, Lewicki PJ, Golombos DM, Scherr DS. Factors impacting the occurrence of local, distant and atypical recurrences after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a detailed analysis of 310 patients. J Urol. 2016;196(5):1390–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Canda AE, Atmaca AF, Altinova S, Akbulut Z, Balbay MD. Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and intracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer: initial experience in 27 cases. BJU Int. 2012 Aug;110(3):434–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith AB, Raynor M, Amling CL, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative outcomes and complications in 227 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22(1):17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johar RS, Hayn MH, Stegemann AP, et al. Complications after robot- assisted radical cystectomy: results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. Eur Urol. 2013;64(1):52–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simone G, Papalia R, Misuraca L, Tuderti G, Minisola F, Ferriero M, Vallati G, Guaglianone S, Gallucci M. Robotic Intracorporeal Padua Ileal Bladder: Surgical Technique, Perioperative, Oncologic and Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2016;pii: S0302–2838(16):30721–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.018. [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Daghmin A, Kauffman EC, Shi Y, Badani K, Balbay MD, Canda E, Dasgupta P, Ghavamian R, Grubb R 3rd, Hemal A, Kaouk J, Kibel AS, Maatman T, Menon M, Mottrie A, Nepple K, Pattaras JG, Peabody JO, Poulakis V, Pruthi R, Palou Redorta J, Rha KH, Richstone L, Schanne F, Scherr DS, Siemer S, Stöckle M, Wallen EM, Weizer A, Wiklund P, Wilson T, Wilding G, Woods M, Guru KA. Efficacy of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in advanced bladder cancer: results from the International Radical Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC). BJU Int. 2014;114(1):98–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12569. Epub 2014 May 22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tyritzis SI, Hosseini A, Collins J, et al. Oncologic, functional, and com- plications outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder diversion. Eur Urol. 2013;64(5):734–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Torrey RR, Chan KG, Yip W, et al. Functional outcomes and complications in patients with bladder cancer undergoing robotic- assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal Indiana pouch continent cutaneous urinary diversion. Urology. 2012;79(5):1073–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Asimakopoulos AD, Campagna A, Gakis G, Corona Montes VE, Piechaud T, Hoepffner JL, Mugnier C, Gaston R. Nerve sparing, robot-assisted radical cystectomy with Intracorporeal bladder substitution in the male. J Urol. 2016 Nov;196(5):1549–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, Nielsen ME, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):196–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Knox ML, El-Galley R, Busby JE. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy: identi cation of patients who bene t from the robotic approach. J Endourol. 2013;27(1):40–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Styn NR, Montgomery JS, Wood DP, et al. Matched comparison of robotic-assisted and open radical cystectomy. Urology. 2012;79(6):1303–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sung HH, Ahn JS, Seo SI, et al. A comparison of early complications between open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy. J Endourol. 2012;26(6):670–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Parekh DJ, Messer J, Fitzgerald J, Ercole B, Svatek R. Perioperative outcomes and oncologic ef cacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2013;189(2):474–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gondo T, Yoshioka K, Nakagami Y, et al. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative and pathologic outcomes in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42(7):625–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ng CK, Kauffman EC, Lee MM, et al. A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):274–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nepple KG, Strope SA, Grubb RL 3rd, Kibel AS. Early oncologic outcomes of robotic vs open radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer. Urol Oncol. 2013;31(6):894–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang GJ, Barocas DA, Raman JD, Scherr DS. Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological ef cacy. BJU Int. 2008;101(1):89–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kader AK, Richards KA, Krane LS, Pettus JA, Smith JJ, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical cystectomy: comparison of complications and perioperative oncological outcomes in 200 patients. BJU Int. 2013;112(4):E290–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sterrett S, Mammen T, Nazemi T, et al. Major urological oncological surgeries can be performed using minimally invasive robotic or laparoscopic methods with similar early perioperative outcomes compared to conventional open methods. World J Urol. 2007;25(2):193–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD, Silberstein J, Keren Paz GE, Donat SM, Coleman JA, Mathew S, Vickers A, Schnorr GC, Feuerstein MA, Rapkin B, Parra RO, Herr HW, Laudone VP. Comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shen Z, Sun Z. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of perioperative outcomes comparing robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy. BMC Urol. 2016 Sep 23;16(1):59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu JC, Chughtai B, O'Malley P, Halpern JA, Mao J, Scherr DS, Hershman DL, Wright JD, Sedrakyan A. Perioperative outcomes, health care costs, and survival after robotic-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a National Comparative Effectiveness Study. Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Atmaca AF, Canda AE, Gok B, Akbulut Z, Altinova S, Balbay MD. Open versus robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal Studer diversion. JSLS. 2015 Jan-Mar;19(1):e2014.00193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, Kassouf W, Muller S, Baldini G, Carli F, Naesheimh T, Ytrebo L, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Knutsen T, Aarsether E, Wiklund P, Patel HR. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2013;32(6):879–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Baack Kukreja JE, Kiernan M, Schempp B, Siebert A, Hontar A, Nelson B, Dolan J, Noyes K, Dozier A, Ghazi A, Rashid HH, Wu G, Messing EM. Quality Improvement in Cystectomy Care with Enhanced Recovery (QUICCER) study. BJU Int. 2017 Jan;119(1):38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Collins JW, Patel H, Adding C, Annerstedt M, Dasgupta P, Khan SM, Artibani W, Gaston R, Piechaud T, Catto JW, Koupparis A, Rowe E, Perry M, Issa R, McGrath J, Kelly J, Schumacher M, Wijburg C, Canda AE, Balbay MD, Decaestecker K, Schwentner C, Stenzl A, Edeling S, Pokupić S, Stockle M, Siemer S, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Weston R, Johnson M, D’Hondt F, Mottrie A, Hosseini A, Wiklund PN. Enhanced Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group Consensus View. Eur Urol. 2016;70(4):649–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Akbulut Z, Canda AE, Ozcan MF, Atmaca AF, Ozdemir AT, Balbay MD. Robot-assisted laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy with bilateral extended lymph node dissection and intracorporeal Studer pouch construction: outcomes of first 12 cases. J Endourol. 2011;25(9):1469–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Canda, A.E. (2019). Robotic Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion for Bladder Cancer. In: Tsuda, S., Kudsi, O. (eds) Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96866-7_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96866-7_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96865-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96866-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics