Abstract
This chapter provides a critique of neoliberal, supply-side austerity policies as they unfold asymmetrically in the EU/Eurozone and beyond. These policies are an outgrowth of the public policy of ordoliberalism emanating from the EU Treaties, especially from 1992 onwards. The main argument advanced is that, contrary to claims by the European Commission and Germany’s ordoliberal elite, sustainable development and austerity are incompatible policy magnitudes. The Eurozone constitutes the worst form of Gold Standard from which countries are impossible to escape and advance the imperative of domestic development as external devaluation and import substitution are no options. The chapter shows that ordoliberal austerity is currently being implemented across the EU and beyond via authoritarian forms of governance from above—the essence of ordoliberalism and neoliberalism—while unintentionally cultivating racist and xenophobic movements from below. Thus, Germany is superintending the process of European disintegration, rather than integration, making a state of exception an enduring feature of the European continent, the overarching aim being to withstand global competitive pressures from both Asia/China and the USA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Ordoliberalism represents neither a coherent body of economic, sociological and legal thought nor its principles are adopted and implemented in their purity by ordoliberal policy-makers. The transposition of ordoliberal thinking onto the various EU/EEC Treaties entails a certain transformation of its theoretical principles as they are put into policy practices and mediated by all sorts of agencies and bureaucracies. As Nicos Poulantzas argued in his last theoretical statement, State, Power, Socialism , there is always a “structural distance between theory and practice”, between theory and the real. The same goes for all theories, including Marxism. This is an aspect missed by all those who do not recognise the ordoliberal character of EU Treaties and the dominant-imperial position of Germany in them. See, for example, some of the chapters in the otherwise fine book edited by Josef Hien and Christian Joerges (2017), Ordoliberalism, Law and the Rule of Economics. In this regard, a far more balanced approach is that offered by Andy Storey (2017), “The myths of ordoliberalism”.
- 2.
Francois Mitterrand’s famous “U-turn” in the early 1980s remains a key event in the turbulent history of the EMS. Mitterrand, who assumed power in 1981—the same year with Andreas Papandreou’s PASOK in Greece—on the basis of an expansionary Keynesian agenda allied with the French Communist Party, abandoned Keynesian reflation and nationalisations. Unable to defend the Franc within the EMS and in midst of rising unemployment and debt , Mitterrand gave up on his socialist promise in March 1983 and embraced a moderate neoliberal platform. As Donald Sassoon noted, “had the French elected a laissez-faire neo-liberal government, as the British did in 1979, its manufacturing sector would have collapsed forever, as the British has done” (Sassoon 1996: 555). However, as Marc Lombard argued, Mitterrand could have not made any concessions to neoliberalism had he not hesitated to operate outside the rigidity of the EMS framework (Lombard 1995). Greece, under veteran socialist Papandreou in the 1980s, put up a better resistance to neoliberal tide, but being a small country with limited capacities was unable to streamline developments in Europe. Scandinavian countries, too, although they pursued demand-led policies throughout, could not influence development in the European core , already dominated by EMS/Germany ’s monetary policy.
- 3.
Note, that current account represents the external creditor/debtor status of the country. It is not a fiscal magnitude. Fiscally, both Ireland and Spain were sound, for example, yet, same as Greece and Portugal , they received bailout funds from the “troika ” (IMF , EU and ECB ). As we have shown elsewhere, the Eurozone crisis is primarily a balance of payments crisis , not a fiscal crisis (Fouskas and Dimoulas 2012, 2013, 2016).
- 4.
The falling rate of profit in the real economic sector and problems in the US balance of payments structure was the result of a number of concurring factors, such as the global competition between Japan, the USA and West Germany and the Vietnam War. See, among others, Brenner (2006) and Arrighi (2007).
- 5.
It should be noted, however, that the first testing ground of the neoliberal doctrine was a Latin American country, Chile, after the fall of Allende (Harvey 2005).
- 6.
For a pristine and comprehensive definition of austerity in a historical perspective, see Blyth (2013).
- 7.
When Yanis Varoufakis Greece’s seven-month Finance Minister (January 2015–July 2015) tried to test his “Plan B”, he found out that even the General Secretariat for the Public Revenue based in his Ministry of Finance was controlled by the creditors, who refused to provide him with the tax codes he wanted in case Greece’s negotiations with the troika failed (Varoufakis 2015, 2017).
- 8.
This has started from the USA with the Wall-Mart and expanded quickly to the UK and elsewhere. This is the very meaning of Tony Blair’s “stakeholder society”, launched in Britain in the late 1990s and embraced by the ideologues of “Third Way”, such as Anthony Giddens. In this respect, Blair, as a fair-weather neoliberal of the Labour Party, contributed far more than Thatcher’s Tory party in embedding ordoliberalism in the UK.
References
Arrighi, G. (2007). Adam Smith in Beijing. London: Verso.
Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity. The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bonefeld, W. (2012). Freedom and the Strong State: On German Ordoliberalism. New Political Economy, 17(5), 633–656.
Brenner, R. (2006). The Economics of Global Turbulence. London: Verso (First Exposition of the Argument in a Single Issue of New Left Review, 1998, I(229), 1–265).
Broadberry, S., & O’Rourke, K. H. (2010). The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Europe. Volume 2: 1870 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dale, G., & El-Enany, N. (2013). The Limits of Social Europe: EU Law and the Ordoliberal Agenda. German Law Journal, 14(5), 613–649.
Fazi, T. (2016, March 31). How Austerity Has Crippled the European Economy—In Numbers. Social Europe.
Flassbeck, H., & Lapavitsas, C. (2015). Against the Troika. Crisis and Austerity in the Eurozone. London: Verso.
Foucault, M. (1979/2010). The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fouskas, V. K. (2016a, August). Brexit: A Financial Thunderclap with Long-Term Consequences. European Financial Review.
Fouskas, V. K. (2016b, November 13). Class, Trump, Brexit and the Decline of the West.openDemocracy.
Fouskas, V. K., & Dimoulas, C. (2012). The Greek Workshop of Debt and the Failure of the European Project. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 14(1) (March), 1–31.
Fouskas, V. K., & Dimoulas, C. (2013). Greece, Financialization and the EU. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fouskas, V. K., & Dimoulas, C. (2016). Class and Politics in the Greek Debt Crisis. In L. S. Talani (Ed.), Europe in Crisis. A Structural Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fouskas, V. K., & Gökay, B. (2012). The Fall of the US Empire. London: Pluto Press.
Frangakis, M. (2015, Autumn). Public Debt Crisis, Austerity and Deflation: The Case of Greece. Review of Keynesian Economics, 3(3), 295–313.
Gill, S., & Claire Cutler, A. (Eds.). (2014). New Constitutionalism and World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Hien, J., & Joerges, C. (Eds.). (2017). Ordoliberalism, Law and the Rule of Economics. Oregon: Hart Publishing.
Keynes, J. M. (1936/1993). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lapavitsas, C., et al. (2010). Eurozone Crisis: Beggar Thyself and Thy Neighbour. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12(4), 321–373.
League of Nationalists. (2016, November 19). The Economist.
Lombard, M. (1995). A Re-Examination of the Reasons for the Failure of Keynesian Expansionary Policies in France, 1981–1983. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(2), 359–372.
Marx, K. (1867/1976). Capital, Vol.1. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Mundell, R. (1961). A Theory of Optimum Currency Area. American Economic Review, 51(4), 657–665.
Oxfam. (2017). www.oxfam.org.uk. Accessed 9 January.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Roberts, M. (2016). The Next Recession. https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/. Accessed 4 January.
Roberts, M. (2017). Germany Stutters. https://germanystutters.wordpress.com/. Accessed 25 September.
Sassoon, D. (1996). One Hundred Years of Socialism. London: I. B. Tauris.
Schäuble, W. (2011, September 5). Why Austerity Is Only Cure for the Euro-zone. Financial Times.
Storey, A. (2017). The Myths of Ordoliberalism (Lexit Network [Mimeo]).
Streeck, W. (2015). Heller, Schmitt and the Euro. European Law Journal, 21(3), 361–370.
Streeck, W. (2016). How Will Capitalism End? London: Verso.
Tabb, W. K. (2013). The International Spread of Financialisation. In M. H. Wolfson & G. A. Epstein (Eds.), The Political Economy of Financial Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Talani, L. S., & McMahon, S. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of the International Political Economy of Migration Cheltenham. London: Edward Elgar.
Varoufakis, Y. (2015, July 17). Conversation with Lamond and Mars (in Greek). O Dromos tis Aristeras.
Varoufakis, Y. (2017). Adults in the Room. My Battle with Europe’s Deep Establishment. London: The Bodley Head.
Wilkinson, M. A. (2013). The Spectre of Authoritarian Liberalism: Reflections on the Constitutional Crisis of the European Union. German Law Journal, 14(5), 527–560.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fouskas, V.K., Gökay, B. (2019). Germany’s Ordoliberal Austerity and the European Disunion. In: The Disintegration of Euro-Atlanticism and New Authoritarianism . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96818-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96818-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96817-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96818-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)