Skip to main content

Contemporary Queer Cinema in France and Italy: Undoing ‘Place’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Performing Place in French and Italian Queer Documentary Film
  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, Brett questions the restrictive taxonomic tendencies of ‘queer cinema’ in France and Italy, and considers whether the increase in queer documentary in the first decade of the new millennium alters the dynamics of this representational space. Brett exposes the in/visibility of ‘place’ in these two contexts, which have an overlapping cinematic history and approach to the accommodation of ‘difference’. These comparisons are positioned within the ‘post-queer’, which reflects the performance of ‘place’ as a divided rather than binary ‘space’. Proust’s ‘lieu factice’ [artificial place] is offered as a way of elucidating these divisions in a postmodern world, where the ‘real’ is ever distant. Its modernist angle is introduced as a dynamic framework for the deliberation of ‘place’ as a key representational protagonist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    RTP from now onwards.

  2. 2.

    A French-Italian co-production, Le fate ignoranti [The Ignorant Fairies] sees Antonia discovering that her dead husband, Massimo, had a male lover, Michele, who forms part of a wider circle of unconventional friends, described as an alternative ‘“queer” family’ (Rigoletto 2010, p. 204).

  3. 3.

    Other key fictional films that arrived were as follows: Benzina (2001); Giorni (2001); Il più bel giorno della mia vita (2002); Il vento, di sera (2003) (ibid.).

  4. 4.

    My translation—unless otherwise acknowledged, please assume that all translations into English are mine.

  5. 5.

    Gary P. Cestaro emphasizes in Queer Italia how World Gay Pride in Rome in the year 2000 was an ‘important turning point in the history of the Italian gay rights movement that for the first time garnered serious national—indeed international—attention’ (2004, p. 1). Mudu adds context to this by explaining that: ‘[t]he [Christian] jubilee marked the climax of a very long papacy devoted to the stout defence of strictly conservative stances in matters of family, sexuality, gender differences, the ordaining of women, etc.’ (2002, p. 195). As a result of the staging of the Pride event at a crucial point in the Catholic Church’s history, a series of ‘turf wars’ ensued in society and the media. The outcome of the whole saga was the challenging of the homogeneity of Rome/Italy through the greater unity seen in the gay and lesbian community and the bringing to the fore of ongoing inequalities in Italian society (ibid., p. 189).

  6. 6.

    Tuttinpiazza (1997)—fourth, and final, part in a series covering aspects of the LGBT movement in Italy between 1994 and 1997 (cinemagay.it); Nessuno Uguale (1998)—produced by AGEDO (Associazione Genitori di Omosessuale/association for parents of homosexuals), this film allows adolescents, gay and straight, to speak of the issue of homosexuality. A later film, Due Volte Genitori (2008), again produced by AGEDO, adopts the parent’s position.

  7. 7.

    Angelone and Clò’s reference to ‘transgender persons and sub-proletarians’ must relate to the film La bocca del lupo (2009) by director Pietro Marcello, a film analysed in Chap. 5 of this book.

  8. 8.

    The ‘anti-globalization film’ focuses on the local and often devastating impact of decisions by companies to close factories and/or to re-locate production elsewhere, for example, whereas the ‘counter-globalization film’ seeks to unearth both the dispersed strategies of companies in maintaining power and control, and the opposition that may be taking place against these (O’Shaughnessy 2007, p. 170).

  9. 9.

    The following festivals in France, as of end of 2017: Chéries–Chéris, Festival du film lesbien, gay, bi, trans, queer et ++++ de Paris https://cheries-cheris.com/ (23rd progamme); Festival Écrans Mixtes, Lyon http://festival-em.org/ (8th programme); In&Out, Nice http://www.lesouvreurs.com/inoutfestival2017/ (9th programme); Vues d’en face: festival international de Grenoble http://www.vuesdenface.com/web/ (17th programme); D’un Bord à l’Autre: Festival de films LGBT, Orléans http://www.festivaldunbordalautre.com/ (8th programme); Paris International Lesbian and Feminist Film Festival https://www.cineffable.fr/en/editoEn.htm (8th programme); FACE à FACE Festival du film gay et lesbien de Saint-Etienne http://www.festivalfaceaface.fr/ (13th programme).

    The following festivals in Italy, as of end of 2017: Sicilia Queer FilmFest http://www.siciliaqueerfilmfest.it/sqff/ (3rd programme); Lovers Film Festival, Turin http://www.loversff.com/servizio/News/32°-Lovers-Film-Festival:-nuovo-nome-e-novita/ca_23884.html (32nd programme); Festival Mix Milano di Cinema Gaylesbico e Queer Culture http://www.festivalmixmilano.com/ (31st programme); Some Prefer Cake: Bologna Lesbian Film Festival http://someprefercakefestival.com/ (9th progamme); Gender Bender Festival Internazionale, Bologna http://www.genderbender.it/en/ (15th programme); Sardinia Queer Short Film Festival http://www.usnexpo.it/ (16th progamme); Omovies, Festival di Cinema Omosessuale , Transgender e Questioning, Napoli http://www.omovies.it/ (10th programme); Divergenti – Festival Internazionale di Cinema Trans, Bologna https://www.facebook.com/mit.italia/ (9th programme). Sites accessed 31 December 2017.

  10. 10.

    In the European context, the term ‘queer’ is considered in more subtle ways (O’Rourke 2011, p. xv).

  11. 11.

    Bois from now onwards.

  12. 12.

    The ‘théatrophone’ [theatre phone] was introduced at the 1889 Paris Exposition. Invented by Clément Ader, it allowed listeners to hear contemporaneous theatre productions via the telephone.

  13. 13.

    Goodkin (1987, p. 1171) refers to links with Orpheus and Eurydice, Pygmalion and Galatea, Tristan and Isolde, Adam and Lilith, and Faust.

  14. 14.

    In mapping out the history of cinema in his own mesmerizing way, Godard questions the very notion of ‘history’ (Neer 2007, pp. 135–136). This video essay film, which is shaped by way of a mélange of sourced images, words, and sounds, is divided into eight parts and deals with issues such as the politics of film, genocide, globalization, Europe, art, sexuality, and religion (ibid.).

  15. 15.

    These priorities were shaped by those who were perceived by the authorities as a threat to modernity’s progress, falling into what Ashley broadly categorizes in her research as mental and social ‘misfits’—the latter of which is of particular interest to this study as it includes ‘sexual deviants’ (i.e. ‘inverts’ and ‘pederasts’). Ashley’s contemporary re-evaluation of the period through the term ‘misfit’ articulates how those demonstrating what were deemed aberrant behaviours were not entirely excluded from society, as might be expected when considered retrospectively from a supposedly more informed position today, but were both inside and outside it (i.e. amiss/fitting) in a way that proved useful in the development of society. What this allowed was the benchmarking of what was ‘normal’ and the identification and treatment of who or what was considered out of sync. On this, there is a significant amount of evidence demonstrating how professional bodies in France and Italy had a continued dialogue with each other concerning the appropriate identification and management of these apparent ‘misfits’ (Ashley 2017).

  16. 16.

    Luca Malici explains that Italians tend to prefer identity categories such as ‘gay’ and ‘lesbian’, and that academic interest in queer theory has only recently started to develop due to limited translations of works from elsewhere. He also explains that ‘queer’ is not understood as a re-appropriated word used for combative purposes as it is in the United Kingdom and the United States (2011, pp. 114–115). Other works have contended with similar concerns. In Gay Signatures: Gay and Lesbian Theory, Fiction and Film in France, 1945–1995, Heathcote et al. offer a queer reading of contemporary gay and lesbian cultural output based on an analysis of the relationship between the respective French and North American contexts (i.e. between an Anglo-American queer perspective and a French ‘pudeur’ [discretion]), suggesting that this approach gives a sense of balance to the French debate concerning gay identities (while at the same time overcoming the all-too-common problem of inappropriately analysing a culture different to one’s own from the position of an Anglo-American queer theoretical perspective) (1998, pp. 7–8, 20–21). In Queer French, Globalization, Language, and Sexual Citizenship in France, Denis M. Provencher proposes that through an ‘American-style’ globalization, a new French gay culture has been encouraged to queer up on both a national and global level (2007, pp. 3–11). In Queer Italia, editor Gary P. Cestaro highlights how the analysis of a variety of texts from different periods points to a collapse in ‘fixed definitions of sexual identity’ (2004, p. 2).

  17. 17.

    This film is set in a school in rural Auvergne, where all the children are taught in a single classroom by one teacher, George Lopez (Dawson 2003).

  18. 18.

    de Lauretis introduced ‘queer theory’ in 1991. This was for a special edition entitled ‘Queer Theory: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities’ for Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. Guided by no one specific theoretical framework, ‘queer theory’ was a response both to the marginalization of non-normative genders and sexualities, and to the widening of a politics of identity (Hennessy 1993, pp. 964–965). Queer theory sought, instead, to challenge fixed and stable categories of identity, and to undo the power relations that sustained these (ibid.). It was also intended as a move away from gay and lesbian studies, which meant that the normalization of queer identities that repeated the inclusivity of earlier decades (i.e. as epitomized through the homophile movement) was challenged through the re-appropriation of various positions that sought to point out its inevitable fallibility (Sullivan 2003, p. 48).

References

  • Angel. 2009. Directed by Sebastiano D’Ayala Valva [DVD]. France: Kanari Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelone, A., and C. Clò. 2011. Other Visions: Contemporary Italian Documentary Cinema as Counter Discourse. Studies in Documentary Film 5 (2/3): 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, S.A. 2017. “Misfits” in Fin-de-Siècle France and Italy. London/New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Au-delà de la haine/Beyond Hatred. 2006. Directed by Olivier Meyrou [DVD]. UK: Peccadillo Pictures

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M.-J., and J. Scheele. 2016. Queer: A Graphic History. London: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M., C. Boudreau, S. Capo, S. Gutwillig, N. Heidenreich, L. Johnson, G. Marzi, D. Otto, and B. Robisnon. 2005. Queer Film and Video Festival Forum, Take One: Curators Speak Out. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 11 (4): 579–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertozzi, M. 2008. Storia del documentario italiano—immagini e culture dell’altro cinema. Venice: Marsilio Editori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beugnet, M., and M. Schmid. 2004. Proust at the Movies. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • BFI. 2018. 10 Great French Gay Films. London: BFI. Available at: http://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/news-bfi/lists/10-great-french-gay-films. Accessed 3 June 2018.

  • Boyle, C. 2012. Post-Queer (Un)Made in France? Paragraph 35 (2): 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, O. 2018. ‘Queer Italian Migrations’: Tonino De Bernardi’s Rosatigre (Tiger Rose) (2000) and the Reconfiguring of Roberto Rossellini’s Stromboli, terra de Dio (Stromboli, Land of God) (1950). Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies 6 (1): 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K., J. Lim, and G. Brown, eds. 2007. Geographies of Sexualities: Theory Practices and Policy. Brookfield: Ashgate Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, L. 2014. Queer, Republican France, and Its Euro-American “Others”. In What’s Queer About Europe? Productive Encounters and Re-enacting Paradigms, ed. M. Rosello and S. Dasgupta, 91–113. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caserio, R.L., L. Edelman, J. Halberstam, J.E. Muñoz, and T. Dean. 2006. The Antisocial Thesis in Queer Theory. PMLA 121 (3): 819–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celestin, R. 2009. Lost in Globalized Space? A Certain French Cinema Abroad. Yale French Studies. New Spaces for French and Francophone Cinema, no. 115, Yale University Press, pp. 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervulle, M., and N. Rees-Roberts. 2010. Homo exoticus: race, classe et critique queer. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cestaro, G.P. 2004. Queer Italia, Same Sex Desire in Italian Literature and Film. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chanan, M. 2007. The Politics of Documentary. London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • cinemaitaliano. 2005. Cinemaitaliano.Info. Available at: https://www.cinemaitaliano.info/. Accessed 3 June 2018.

  • Cinetrec. 2015. Tous les films ayant pour thématique: Gay. Available at: http://www.cinetrafic.fr/film-gay. Accessed 3 June 2018.

  • Dawson T. 2003. Être et avoir (To Be and To Have). Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2003/06/03/etre_et_avoir_2003_review.shtml. Accessed 1 July 2018.

  • Downing, L., and R. Gillett, eds. 2011. Queer in Europe. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D. 2006. Reading and Writing Italian Homosexuality: A Case for Possible Difference. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The Queerness of Italian Cinema. In A Companion to Italian Cinema, ed. F. Burke, 467–483. New York, Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duyvendak, J. 2011. The Politics of Home: Belonging and Nostalgia in Europe and the United States. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, R., and J. Pidduck. 2003. Now You See It: Studies in Lesbian and Gay Film. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsaesser, T. 2006. Double Occupancy: Space, Place and Identity in European Cinema of the 1990s. Third Text 20 (6): 647–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eribon, D. 2004. Insult and the Making of the Gay Self. Translated from the French by M. Lucey. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Être et avoir. 2002. Directed by Nicolas Philibert [DVD]. France: Les Films du Losagne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezra, E., and T. Rowden, eds. 2006. Transnational Cinema: The Film Reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Film-documentaire. 2018. Portail du film documentaire. Available at: http://www.film-documentaire.fr/4DACTION/w_accueil. Accessed 1 July 2018.

  • Forgacs, D., and L. Caldwell. 2003. Ossessione DVD Commentary. Recorded 24 Feb 2003. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/7638100/Ossessione_Luchino_Visconti_1943_. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • Gamble, C. 2001. From Belle Epoque to First World War: The Social Panorama. In The Cambridge Companion to Proust, ed. R. Bales, 7–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, G. 2004. Un siècle de documentaires français. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodkin, R.E. 1987. Film and Fiction: Hitchcock’s Vertigo and Proust’s “Vertigo”. MLN 102 (5): 1171–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R., ed. 2008. Queer Cinema in Europe. Bristol: Intellect Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther, R., and O. Heathcote. 2006. Gays and Lesbians in Contemporary France: Politics, Media, Sexualities. Modern & Contemporary France 14 (3): 287–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther, S. 2009. The Elastic Closet: A History of Homosexuality in France, 1942–Present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. 2005. In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, O., A. Hughes, and J.S. Williams. 1998. Gay Signatures: Gay and Lesbian Theory, Fiction and Film in France, 1945–1995. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, R. 1993. Queer Theory: A Review of the “Differences” Special Issue and Wittig’s “The Straight Mind”. Signs 18 (4): 964–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, M. 2010. Time Images: Metaphor, Metonymy and Montage in Marcel Proust’s A la recherche du temps perdu and Jean-Luc Godard’s Histoire(s) du Cinéma. Paragraph 33 (1): 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higson, A. 2006. The Limiting Imagination of National Cinema. In Transnational Cinema: The Film Reader, ed. E. Ezra and T. Rowden, 15–25. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E.J. 2001. Proust and Social Spaces. In The Cambridge Companion to Proust, ed. Richard Bales, 151–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Improvvisamente l’inverno scorso. 2008. Directed by Gustav Hofer and Luca Ragazzi [DVD]. Italy: Ponte alle grazie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ince, K. 2002. Queering the Family? Fantasy and the Performance of Sexuality and Gay Relations in French Cinema 1995–2000. Studies in French Cinema 2 (2): 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Italy: Love It or Leave It. 2011. Directed by Gustav Hofer and Luca Ragazzi [DVD]. Italy: hiq productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagose, A. 1996. Queer Theory. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsiaficas, G. 1997. The Latent Universal within Identity Politics. New Political Science 19 (1–2): 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K.T. (2016) Placeless Places: Resolving the Paradox of Foucault’s Heterotopias. Textual Practice, April 23, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopp, L. 2007. From Lesbian and Gay to Queer Geographies: Pasts, Prospects and Possibilities. In Geographies of Sexualities: Theory Practices and Policy, ed. K. Browne, J. Lim, and G. Brown, 21–28. Brookfield: Ashgate Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach in Literature and Art. Translated from the French by T. Gora, A. Jardine, and L.S. Roudiez. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, A. 2007. The Nouvelle Vague. In The Cinema Book, ed. P. Cook, 3rd ed., 202–204. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • La bocca del lupo. 2009. Directed by Pietro Marcello [DVD]. Italy: L’Avventurosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Persona De Leo N. 2005. Directed by Alberto Vendemmiati [DVD]. Italy: Millennium Storm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le fate ignoranti. 2001. Directed by Ferzan Özpetek [DVD]. Italy: Medusa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les Travestis Pleurent Aussi. 2006. Directed by Sebastiano D’Ayala Valva [DVD]. France: Kanari Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma La Spagna Non Era Cattolica? 2007. Directed by Peter Marcias [DVD]. Italy: Ultima Onda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangiarotti, G. 2018. Email to Oliver Brett, June 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malici, L. 2011. Queer in Italy: Italian Televisibility and the ‘Queerable’ Audience. In Queer in Europe, ed. L. Downing and R. Gillett, 111–128. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marie, M. 2009. French Cinema in the New Century. In New Spaces for French and Francophone Cinema, Yale French Studies, ed. J.F. Austin, vol. 115, 9–30. New Haven: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B. 1998. Gay Cinema. In Encyclopedia of Contemporary French Culture, ed. A. Hughes and K. Reader, 262–263. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A. 1999. ‘Resistance Is Hopeless’: Assimilating Queer Theory. Social Semiotics 9 (2): 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudu, P. 2002. Repressive Tolerance: The Gay Movement and the Vatican in Rome. GeoJournal 58 (2/3): 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naficy, H. 2001. An Accented Cinema, Exilic and Diasporic Filmmaking. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, P.M. 1998. The Globalization of the Gay & Lesbian Socio-Political Movement: Some Observations About Europe with a Focus on Italy. Sociological Perspectives 41 (3): 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndalianis, A. 2007. Art Cinema. In The Cinema Book, ed. P. Cook, 3rd ed., 83–87. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neer, R. 2007. Godard Counts. Critical Inquiry 34 (1): 135–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, M. 2011. Europe’: Faltering Project or Infinite Task (Some Other Headings for Queer Theory)’. In Queer in Europe, ed. L. Downing and R. Gillett. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy, M. 2007. The New Face of Political Cinema: Commitment in French Film Since 1995. Oxford: Bergahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma, P. 2017. Viaggio in Francia: Pathé Italian–French Co-productions in the 1950s and 1960s. Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies 5 (3): 333–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patanè, V. 1998. New Queer and New Dyke Cinema; Appendix to Lo Schermo Velato. Available at: http://www.cinziaricci.it/filmes/mono-newqueer.htm. Accessed 18 Aug 2013.

  • ———. 2005. L’altra metà dell’amore: Dieci anni di cinema omosessuale. Roma: DeriveAprodi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. 2006. Transgender on Screen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pini, A. 2011. Quando eravamo froci: Gli omosessuli nell’Italia di una volta. Milan: Il Saggiatore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prearo, M. 2015. La naissance de la France «LGBT» en France et en Italie: une analyse comparative de discours de mobilisation. Cultures et Conflits 97: 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proust, Marcel. 1913. Du côté de chez Swann. 1988th ed. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002a [1913]. In Search of Lost Time, vol. 1, The Way by Swann’s. Translated from the French by L. Davis. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b [1927]. In Search of Lost Time, vol. 6 Finding Time Again. Translated from the French by I. Patterson. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provencher, D.M. 2007. Queer French, Globalization, Language, and Sexual Citizenship in France. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees-Roberts, N. 2008. French Queer Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. Ruby. 2006. The New Homosexual Film Festivals. GLQ: A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies 12 (4): 620–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. New Queer Cinema–The Director’s Cut. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigoletto, S. 2010. Sexual Dissidence and the Mainstream: The Queer Triangle in Ferzan Ozpetek’s Le fate ignoranti. The Italianist 30 (2): 202–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi Barilli, G. 1999. Il movimento gay in Italia. Milano: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffolo, D.V. 2009. Post-Queer Politics. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, J. 2003. Réalité et imaginaire des parcs et des jardins dans la deuxième moitié du XIXe siècle. Nineteenth-Century French Studies 31 (3/4): 278–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schinardi, R. 2003. Cinema Gay, l’enesimo genere. Fiesole: Cadmo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonover, K., and R. Galt. 2016. Queer Cinema in the World. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, R. 2007. Third World and Postcolonial Cinema. In The Cinema Book, ed. P. Cook, 3rd ed., 97–107. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, N. 2003. A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, D., S. Brind, and R. McKenzie, eds. 2007. The State of the Real: Aesthetics in the Digital Age. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabous et Transgressions dans mes films: Un film (un peu narcissique) de Philippe Vallois. 2007. Directed by Philippe Vallois [DVD]. France: Rendez-Vous pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Un chant d’amour. 1950. Directed by Jean Genet [DVD]. London: BFI video publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidler, A., M. Foucault, and P. Johnston. 2014. Heterotopias. AA Files 69: 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, D. 2009. Framing Film: The History and Art of Cinema, Volume 9: Queering Contemporary French Popular Cinema: Images and Their Reception. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. 1999. Marcel Proust: A Life. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brett, O. (2018). Contemporary Queer Cinema in France and Italy: Undoing ‘Place’. In: Performing Place in French and Italian Queer Documentary Film. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96701-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics