Abstract
In 2008, there was a turning point in the history of electoral campaigns, the first presidential campaign of Barack Obama was the beginning of policy 2.0. Obama’s campaign team demonstrated the power and influence in modern society, of the social-digital networks and diverse platforms such as Google, YouTube, Twitter, instant messaging and websites, included in what is called information technologies and communication (ICT). Ten years after that mythical election, a new paradigm becomes more evident. They are the 4.0 networks which will interconnect almost everything to the internet, within this new dynamic, the social networks are also evolving, today it is not just about uploading or viewing content, but to interact and thereby generate broadcast networks. Within the spectrum of social media, there is one that has become, in the cornerstone of modern communication. Facebook is the most important social network at international level, its evolution has been vertiginous, and it went from being a network among friends, to become an indispensable advertising platform in the world of digital marketing, to such a degree that it has positioned itself as the second medium, recipient of advertising spending, just below Google. Facebook is a multiplatform, where you can find applications, games and pages known as “fanpages”, these websites represent, for companies, political parties, public figures and for governmental and civil organizations, a virtual system of social interaction. When users comment on a publication, discussion or debate networks can be generated among users, increasing the organic scope of the publication. The present investigation will focus on analyzing the structure of the networks that generate the likes in the comments made, within the fanpages of the presidential candidates in Mexico, who have positioned themselves as leaders in most of the electoral polls, for the presidency from Mexico. The set of data and information obtained as: degree of interactions, reactions, discussion, debate, support, comments and responses, can be called “neo social interaction”. This result will serve to have an alternative vision, about the popularity, from the point of view of the interactions in their fanpages, taking into account that Facebook has positioned itself as the most influential medium for obtaining political and electoral information.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barabási, A.: From network structure. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 33–42, August 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2007.384127
Newman, M.E.J.: The structure and function of complex networks. Siam Rev. 45(2), 167–256 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480
Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., Leskovec, J., Tiwari, M.: Global diffusion via cascading invitations: structure, growth, and homophily. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2015), pp. 66–76 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2736277.2741672
Bond, R.M., Fariss, C.J., Jones, J., Kramer, A.D.I., Marlow, C., Settle, J.E., Fowler, J.H.: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489(7415), 295–298 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421
Postigo, M.: Campaña en la red: estrategias de marketing electoral en Internet. Revista Académica de Marketing (2012). http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4125640&info=resumen&idioma=SPA
Jiménez Zarate, C.A.: Dinámica y efectividad de las fanpages de Facebook de candidatos a gobernador en los resultados electorales. Innovaciones de Negocios, 13(26), 221–238 (2016). http://www.web.facpya.uanl.mx/rev_in/Revistas/13_26/13.26 A4.pdf
Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., Hwang, D.: Complex networks: Structure and dynamics, 424, 175–308 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009
Braha, D., De Aguiar, M.A.M.: Voting contagion: Modeling and analysis of a century of U.S. presidential elections. PLoS One 12(5), 1–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177970
Slattery, R.E., McHardy, R.R., Bairathi, R.: On the Topology of the Facebook Page Network, 3 (2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.2189
McSweeney, P.: Gephi Network Statistics. Google Summer of Code, 1–8. (2009). http://gephi.org/google-soc/gephi-netalgo.pdf
Freeman, L.C.: A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
Bonacich, P.: Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am. J. Sociol. 92(5), 1170–1182 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1086/228631. Accessed 1977
Goel, S., Anderson, A., Hofman, J., Watts, D.J.: The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion. Manag. Sci. 62(1), 150722112809007 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2158
Consulted in http://www.infoeleccionesmexico.com/encuestas-presidenciales-mexico.php. Accessed 21 Jan 2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zarate, C.A.J. (2018). Social Neointeraction on Facebook, Presidential Campaign Mexico 2018. In: Morales, A., Gershenson, C., Braha, D., Minai, A., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX. ICCS 2018. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96660-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96661-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)