Skip to main content

Critique of Human Rights Universalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society

Abstract

This chapter offers a critical analysis of several forms of skepticism toward human rights universality. What is the substance of the critique of human rights universalism? To what extent is this critique a form of relativism? Is such relativism preferable to universalism?

It is argued that a reasonable critique of human rights universalism calls for a new form of universalism. The perspective proposed is that of “critical universalism”, that is, a normative universalism informed by the challenge of relativism. Additionally, human rights are understood in this chapter as a multidimensional value system with legal, political, and moral levels. It is therefore argued that the universality of human rights cannot be justified if human rights are interpreted as primarily legal norms. Nor is it possible to claim universal validity on behalf of conventional political moralities. What is justifiable is a call for a universality of moral judgments that is an essential feature of ethics as a critique of conventional norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The terminology adopted here is developed by the Swedish ethicist Carl-Henric Grenholm (Grenholm 2014).

  2. 2.

    By “the West”, I have in mind North America and Western Europe, including their respective spheres of political and discursive influence.

  3. 3.

    My own view is that the extended interpretation of the Responsibility to protect is used, in violation of UN treaties, to legitimize interventions in sovereign states, thereby causing state collapses and refugee catastrophes (Byers 2015, pp. 119–124 and Marko 2012, pp. 265–292).

  4. 4.

    My position has some similarities with that of Rainer Forst who, discussing the political history of human rights, argues that “[…] the main point of this rights discourse was to claim the right to participate in the political structures that determine which rights and duties those subjected to them have” (Forst 2012, p. 86).

References

  • Benhabib, Seyla. 2012. Is There a Human Right to Democracy? Beyond Interventionism and Indifference. In Philosophical Dimensions of Human Rights. Some Contemporary Views, ed. Claudio Corradetti. London and New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Practical Reason. On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, Michael. 2015. International Law and Responsibility to Protect. In Theorising the Responsibility to Protect, ed. Ramesh Thakur and William Maley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, Jack. 2003. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Human Rights: Both Universal and Relative. Human Rights Quarterly 30: 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forst, Rainer. 2012. The Justification of Human Rights and the Basic Right to Justification. In Corradetti, Claudio: Philosophical Dimensions of Human Rights. London and New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenholm, Carl-Henric. 2014. Etisk teori. Kritik av moralen. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther, Klaus. 1999. The Legacies of Injustice and Fear: A European Approach to Human Rights and their Effects on Political Culture. In The EU and Human Rights, ed. Philip Alston. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerström, Axel. 1966a. Om moraliska föreställningars sanning. In Hägerström: Socialfilosofiska uppsatser. Stockholm: Bonniers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1966b. Om social rättvisa. In Socialfilosofiska uppsatser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, Richard M. 1981. Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, Michael. 2001. Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1920. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Leipzig: Verlag von Felix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marko, Joseph. 2012. Ethnopolitics. The Challenge for Human and Minority Rights Protection. In Philosophical Dimensions of Human Rights, ed. Claudio Corradetti. London and New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David. 2003. Human Rights in a Multicultural World. In Mänskliga rättigheter – från forskningens frontlinjer, ed. Diana Amneus and Göran Gunner, 39–50. Uppsala: Iustus Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namli, Elena. 2014. Universal or Corporeal Reason? On the Russian Critique of Western Rationalism and its Political Relevance. In Human Rights as Ethics, Politics, and Law, ed. Elena Namli. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Human Dignity and Protection of Rights: An Argument against Legalistic Reductionism. In Responsibility and the Enhancement of Life, ed. Günter Thomas and Heike Springhart. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and Human Development. The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Onuma, Yasuaki. 1999. Toward a More Inclusive Human Rights Regime. In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, ed. Joanne R. Bauer and Daniel A. Bell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law: Questioning Prevalent Cognitive Frameworks in the Emerging Multi-Civilizational World of the Twenty-First Century. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. International Law and Power in the Multipolar and Multicivilizational World of the Twenty-first Century. In Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs, ed. Richard Falk, Mark Juergensmeyer, and Vesselin Popovski. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal, Balakrishnan. 2003. International Law from Bellow. Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, L.W. 1987. The Moral Foundation of Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, Gianni. 2007. A Prayer for Silence. In After the Death of God, ed. John D. Caputo and Gianni Vattimo. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/Vienna.aspx. Accessed 3 Oct 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Namli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Namli, E. (2018). Critique of Human Rights Universalism. In: Stenmark, M., Fuller, S., Zackariasson, U. (eds) Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96559-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics