Skip to main content

Introduction: Engaging Relativism and Post-Truth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this chapter, Zackariasson offers some background to the contemporary discussions of relativism and post-truth in academic as well as public debate. He discusses the factual and normative factors that together form part of what we can call a dynamic of relativization—a dynamic that increasingly pushes us to acknowledge the relative character of most, or even all, judgments and truth-claims. The chapter also introduces some basic terminology, such as what we could mean by a post-truth condition, and the relevance of the distinction between descriptive and normative relativism for the relativism debate. Finally, it offers a brief overview of the coming chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    You could, of course, like some critics of consumerism, for instance, hold that the differences we see are really superficial, and that there is broad consensus among virtually all citizens about the virtues of capitalism, consumerism and choice. Here, I will not pursue that route, however.

  2. 2.

    Regardless of which of these individuations of the relevant community we opt for, relativisms typically face the rather difficult task of accounting for which kinds of communities that truth or the adequacy of judgments is relative to. A critic of relativism such as Louis Pojman claims that these difficulties are so grave that, eventually, relativism will collapse into subjectivism, because cultures and religions are so heterogeneous that we can divide them into ever smaller communities until we are down to the individual level (Pojman 2001).

References

  • Alston, William P. 1991. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, James. 2017. Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World. London: Biteback Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L., and Anton C. Zijderveld. 2009. In Praise of Doubt. New York: HarperOne/HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, Paul. 2007. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, George. 2004. Isaiah Berlin: Liberty and Pluralism, Cambridge/Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ancona, Matthew. 2017. Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. 2008. Meditations on First Philosophy. Translated by Michael Moriarty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve. 2018. Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game. London: Anthem Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1984. Anti-Anti-Relativism. American Anthropologist 86 (2): 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hales, Steven D. 2014. Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Enl. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 2:2. 2nd. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin. 2000. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 2004. Gorgias. London/New York: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojman, Louis P. 2001. Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantsev, Peter. 2015. Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible: The Surreal Heart of the New Russia. Reprint ed. Philadelphia, PA: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary. 1990. Realism with a Human Face. Edited by James Conant. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, James, and Stuart Rachels. 2015. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renteln, Alison Dundes. 1990. International Human Rights. In Frontiers of Anthropology. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays: 1972–1980. Brighton: Harvester P.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulf Zackariasson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zackariasson, U. (2018). Introduction: Engaging Relativism and Post-Truth. In: Stenmark, M., Fuller, S., Zackariasson, U. (eds) Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96559-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics