Advertisement

How Should We Drive Self-driving Vehicles? Anticipation and Collective Imagination in Planning Mobility Futures

  • Miloš N. Mladenović
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Self-driving vehicle (SDV) technology, in its current foundational stage, brings about significant uncertainties, indicating a society-wide disruption. In this context, one cannot disentangle envisioning futures with SDVs from questions of (re)distribution of societal benefits and burdens. Contrastingly, the need for strategies to cope with this disruption has recently been recognized through several planning efforts. Despite their fruitfulness, missing an elaborated understanding of technology as a socio-technical phenomenon remains an underlying challenge. However, reclaiming technological futures as plannable spaces requires understanding that human ends are not well-defined or static, and that technology does not have unstoppable, unquestionable, momentum. At the central point of contention, we argue for replacing the language of unintended consequences with the language of unanticipated consequences. Furthermore, we recognize the threat of anticipation inequality if we solely rely on expert-based practices. To support divergent envisioning efforts, we propose a phase of participatory expansion of technological horizons for (un)desirable futures. To this end, we provide an example from an online discussion platform for reflective engagement about mobility futures with SDVs for a neighborhood in the Helsinki capital region. Finally, we reflect on challenges for inter-organizational learning in coping with contingencies.

Keywords

Automated vehicle Connected vehicle Technology governance Transport justice Transport system planning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported with funding from the Academy of Finland, through Strategic Research Council project BEMINE (No. 303538), and by the Climate-KIC, through SELF-DRIVEN Areas project.

References

  1. Anon. (n.d.) Bloomberg aspen initiative on cities and autonomous vehicles. Available at: https://avsincities.bloomberg.org. Accessed 1 Dec 2017
  2. Anon. (2016) Federal automated vehicles policy. Available at: https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/AVpolicyguidancePDF.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2017
  3. Auld J, Sokolov V, Stephens TS (2017) Analysis of the effects of connected-automated vehicle technologies on travel demand. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2625:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks VA, Stanton NA, Harvey C (2014) Sub-systems on the road to vehicle automation: hands and feet free but not mind free driving. Saf Sci 62:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker F, Axhausen KW (2017) Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation 44(6):1293–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergmann S, Sager T (2008) The ethics of mobilities: rethinking place, exclusion, freedom and environment. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  8. Blyth PL, Mladenovic MN, Nardi BA et al (2016) Expanding the design horizon for self-driving vehicles: distributing benefits and burdens. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 35(3):44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haldor B, Myklebust S, Myrvang C, Sejersted F (2002) The democratic challenge to capitalism: management and democracy in the Nordic Countries, 1st ed. Copenhagen Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen TD, Kockelman KM, Hanna JP (2016) Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 94:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. Open University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell DJ (2009) Planning and its orientation to the future. Int Plan Stud 14(1):85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Docherty I, Marsden G, Anable J (2017) The governance of smart mobility. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012
  14. Fagnant D, Kockelman K (2015) Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 77:167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fagnant DJ, Kockelman K (2014) The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 40:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraedrich E, Beiker S, Lenz B (2015) Transition pathways to fully automated driving and its implications for the sociotechnical system of automobility. Eur J Futur Res 3(1):11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gettman D, Lott JS, Goodwin G, Harrington T (2017) Impacts of laws and regulations on CV and AV technology introduction in transit operations. Federal Highway AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  18. Guerra E (2016) Planning for cars that drive themselves: metropolitan planning organizations, regional transportation plans, and autonomous vehicles. J Plan Educ Res 36(2):210–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guston DH (2014) Understanding anticipatory governance. Soc Stud Sci 44(2):218–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hajer M (2003) Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sci 36(2):175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harper CD, Hendrickson CT, Mangones S, Samaras C (2016) Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 72:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. JafariNaimi N (2018) Our bodies in the trolley’s path, or why self-driving cars must *not* be programmed to kill. Sci Technol Hum Values 43(2)Google Scholar
  23. Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41(3):223–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jasanoff S (2016) The ethics of invention: technology and the human future. WW Norton & CompanyGoogle Scholar
  25. Jokinen JP, Sihvola T, Mladenovic MN (2017) Policy lessons from the flexible transport service pilot Kutsuplus in the Helsinki Capital Region. Transp Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. König M, Neumayr L (2017) Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 44:42–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Latour B, Venn C (2002) Morality and technology. Theory Cult Soc 19(5–6):247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lutin J, Kornhauser A, Lerner-Lam E (2013) The revolutionary development of self-driving vehicles and implications for the transportation engineering profession. ITE J 83(7):28–33Google Scholar
  29. Lyons G, Davidson C (2016) Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 88:104–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Metzger J, Allmendinger P, Oosterlynck S (2015) Planning against the political: democratic deficits in European Territorial Governance. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer J, Becker H, Bösch PM, Axhausen KW (2017) Autonomous vehicles: the next jump in accessibilities? Res Transp Econ 62:80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milakis D et al (2017a) Development and transport implications of automated vehicles in the Netherlands: scenarios for 2030 and 2050. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 17(1):63–85Google Scholar
  33. Milakis D, van Arem B, van Wee B (2017b) Policy and society related implications of automated driving: a review of literature and directions for future research. J Intell Transp Syst 21(4):324–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mladenovic M, Blyth PL, Abbas M, Kosonen I (2016) Intersecting our mobilities: path dependence from manually-operated semaphore to self-driving vehicles? In: 2016 IEEE international symposium on technology and society (ISTAS). IEEE, New York, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  35. Mladenovic M et al (2017) Is planning (for) self-driving vehicle technology a question of social justice? A Finnish perspective. Association of European Schools of Planning. LisbonGoogle Scholar
  36. Nieuwenhuijsen J, de Almeida Correia GH, Milakis D et al (2018) Towards a quantitative method to analyze the long-term innovation diffusion of automated vehicles technology using system dynamics. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 86:300–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci Public Policy 39(6):751–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pacey A (1999) Meaning in technology. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Pangbourne K, Stead D, Mladenovic M, Milakis D (2018) The case of mobility as a service: a critical reflection on challenges for urban transport and mobility governance. In: Marsden G, Reardon L (eds) Governance of the smart mobility transition. Emerald, pp. 33–50Google Scholar
  40. Quay R (2010) Anticipatory governance. J Am Plan Assoc 76(4):496–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rayner S (2004) The novelty trap: why does institutional learning about new technologies seem so difficult? Ind High Edu 18(6):349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rip A (1986) Controversies as informal technology assessment. Knowledge 8(2):349–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schellekens M (2015) Self-driving cars and the chilling effect of liability law. Comput Law Secur Rev 31(4):506–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schiller P (2016) Automated and connected vehicles: high tech hope or hype? World Transp Policy Pract 22(3):28–44Google Scholar
  45. Shladover SE (2017) Connected and automated vehicle systems: introduction and overview. J Intell Transp Syst, 1–11Google Scholar
  46. Stilgoe J (2017) Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars. Soc Stud Sci, 30631271774168Google Scholar
  47. Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42(9):1568–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Talebpour A, Mahmassani HS (2016) Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 71:143–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomopoulos N, Givoni M (2015) The autonomous car—a blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. desirable outcomes. Eur J Futur Res 3(1):14Google Scholar
  50. Upham P, Kivimaa P, Virkamäki V (2013) Path dependence and technological expectations in transport policy: the case of Finland and the UK. J Transp Geogr 32:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Urry J (2004) The system of automobility. Theory Cult Soc 21(4–5):25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vellinga N (2017) From the testing to the deployment of self-driving cars: legal challenges to policymakers on the road ahead. Comput Law Secur Rev 33(6):847–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Voss J-P, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (2006) Reflexive Governance for sustainable development. Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker W, Marchau V (2017) Dynamic adaptive policymaking for the sustainable city: the case of automated taxis. Int J Transp Sci Technol 6(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Williams T, Wagner J, Morgan C et al (2017) Transportation planning implications of automated/connected vehicles on Texas highways (0-6848-1). Texas Department of TransportationGoogle Scholar
  56. Winner L (1977) Autonomous technology: technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  57. Zakharenko R (2016) Self-driving cars will change cities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 61:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zmud J, Goodin G, Moran M et al (2017) Advancing automated and connected vehicles: policy and planning strategies for state and local transportation agencies. Federal Highway AdministrationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Spatial Planning and Transportation Engineering, Department of Built EnvironmentAalto UniversityEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations