Abstract
We present an experiential account of an adult mathematics classroom and try to make a case that themes like optimization and processes like multiple representations, formal communication, argumentation etc. deserve a place in the curriculum for adults learning mathematics. This requires a re-orientation of what we expect the learner to achieve but respects the learner’s maturity and offers the learner a way of thinking that is enriching.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ascher, M. (2002). The kolam tradition, American Scientist, 90(1), 56.
Barton, B. (1996). Making sense of ethnomathematics: Ethnomathematics is making sense. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1/2), 201–233 (Socio-cultural approaches to mathematics teaching and learning).
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
Civil, M. (2007). Building community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Ernest, P. (1998). The epistemological basis of qualitative research in mathematics education: A postmodern perspective. In A. R. Teppo (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in mathematics education (pp. 22–39). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Frankenstein, M. (1995). Equity in mathematics education: Class in the world outside the class. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 165–190). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed (R. R. Barr, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
Gerdes, P. (1988). On possible uses of traditional Angolan sand drawings in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(1), 3–22.
Gutstein, E. R. (2016). “Our issues, our people—math as our weapon”: Critical mathematics in a Chicago neighborhood high school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(5), 454–504.
Halldén, O. (1999). Conceptual change and contextualization. In W. Schnotz, M. Carretero, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 53–65). London: Elsevier.
Naranan, S. (2007). Fibonacci kolams. Available from http://vindhiya.com/Naranan/Fibonacci-Kolams/.
NFG. (2006). Position paper on teaching of mathematics by the National Focus Group. National curriculum framework—2005. National Council for Education, Research and Training, Government of India. Available from http://www.ncert.nic.in/html/focus_group.htm.
Nilsson, P., & Ryve, A. (2010). Focal event, contextualization, and effective communication in the mathematics classroom, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(3), 241–258.
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Polya, G. (1969). The goals of mathematical education. ComMuniCator, The Magazine of the California Mathematics Council.
Ramanujam, R. (2010). Live mathematics and classroom processes. In R. Bhatia (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Vol. 1, pp. 662–679). Hyderabad.
Ramanujam, R. (2012). An overview of mathematics education in India. In R. Ramanujam & K. Subramaniam (Eds.), Mathematics education in India: Status and outlook. Mumbai: Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education (A collection of background papers for the Indian National Presentation, ICME-12, Seoul).
Rampal, A., Saraswathi, L. S., & Ramanujam, R. (1998). Numeracy counts. Mussoorie: National Literacy Resource Centre (in English and Hindi).
Rao, N. (1993, May 8). Total literacy campaigns: A field report. Economic and Political Weekly, 28(19), 914–918.
Ryve, A. (2006). Making explicit the analysis of students’ mathematical discourses: Revisiting a newly developed methodological framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 191–210.
Skovsmose, O. (2004). Critical mathematics education for the future. In M. Niss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Roskilde, Denmark: IMFUFA, Roskilde University.
von Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Wheeler, D. (1982). Mathematisation matters. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(1), 45–47.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramanujam, R. (2018). Mathematical Explorations in the Adult Classroom. In: Safford-Ramus, K., Maaß, J., Süss-Stepancik, E. (eds) Contemporary Research in Adult and Lifelong Learning of Mathematics. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96502-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96502-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96501-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96502-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)