Electrocortical Evidence for Long-Term Incidental Spatial Learning Through Modified Navigation Instructions
The use of Navigation Assistance Systems for spatial orienting has become increasingly popular. Such automated navigation support, however, comes with a reduced processing of the surrounding environment and often with a decline of spatial orienting ability. To prevent such deskilling and to support spatial learning, the present study investigated incidental spatial learning by comparing standard navigation instructions with two modified navigation instruction conditions. The first modified instruction condition highlighted landmarks and provided additional redundant information regarding the landmark (contrast condition), while the second highlighted landmarks and included information of personal interest to the participant (personal-reference condition). Participants’ spatial knowledge of the previously unknown virtual city was tested three weeks later. Behavioral and electroencephalographic (EEG) data demonstrated enhanced spatial memory performance for participants in the modified navigation instruction conditions without further differentiating between modified instructions. Recognition performance of landmarks was better and the late positive complex of the event-related potential (ERP) revealed amplitude differences reflecting an increased amount of recollected information for modified navigation instructions. The results indicate a significant long-term spatial learning effect when landmarks are highlighted during navigation instructions.
KeywordsSpatial navigation EEG Navigation assistance system Incidental learning
This work was supported by a stipend from the Stiftung der Deutschen Wirtschaft to AW. We would like to thank Matthias Rötting at TU Berlin for providing the car simulator facilities and Sabine Grieger for helping to conduct the experiment.
- 1.McKendrick, R., et al.: Into the wild: neuroergonomic differentiation of hand-held and augmented reality wearable displays during outdoor navigation with functional near infrared spectroscopy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10(May), 1–15 (2016)Google Scholar
- 3.Forbes, N., Burnett, G.E.: Investigating the contexts in which in-vehicle navigation system users have received and followed inaccurate route guidance instructions. In: Dorn, L. (ed.) Driver Behavior and Training, vol. III, pp. 292–310. Ashgate Publishing Limited (2007)Google Scholar
- 5.Gramann, K., Hoepner, P., Karrer-Gauss, K.: Modified navigation instructions for spatial navigation assistance systems lead to incidental spatial learning. Front. Psychol. 8(Feb), 193 (2017)Google Scholar
- 6.Giannopoulos, I., Kiefer, P., Raubal, M.: GazeNav: gaze based pedestrian navigation. Paper Presented at the MobileHCI, 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Copenhagen, Denmark (2015)Google Scholar
- 17.Kun, A.L., Paek, T., Medenica, Ž., Memarović, N., Palinko, O.: Glancing at personal navigation devices can affect driving: experimental results and design implications. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2009, p. 129 (2009)Google Scholar
- 18.Medenica, Z., Kun, A.L., Paek, T., Palinko, O.: Augmented reality vs. street views: a driving simulator study comparing two emerging navigation aids. Proceedings International Conference Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2011), pp. 265–274 (2011)Google Scholar
- 25.Roediger, H., McDermott, K.: Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In: Boller, F., Grafman, J. (eds.) Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol. 8, pp. 63–131. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1993)Google Scholar
- 27.Kothe, C.: Lab streaming layer (LSL) (2014). https://github.com/sccn/labstreaminglayer. Accessed 7 July 2018
- 29.Makeig, S., Bell, A.J., Jung, T.-P., Sejnowski, T.J.: Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 8, 145–151 (1996)Google Scholar