Advertisement

Business Process Management, Continuous Improvement and Enterprise Architecture: In the Jungle of Governance

  • Torben TamboEmail author
  • Nikolaj Dybdal Clausen
Conference paper
  • 317 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 326)

Abstract

Business Process Management (BPM) is fundamental in IT/IS systems requirement specifications and is also well positioned in Enterprise Architecture (EA) frameworks and practices. Continuous Improvement (CI) relates to agendas of lean, six sigma, and incessant push for increased effectiveness of the organization. This paper is developing a position of EA-driven BPM as being long-term, strategic and “slow”, whereas CI is short-term, operational and “fast”. A case study is presented, where CI is furthermore locally based and BPM is centrally based in a larger organization. This leads to conflicts between BPM and CI where the corporate value of both is eroded as IS initiatives on ERP implementation are prolonged and CI initiatives fail to match to-be scenarios. This paper discuss EA as a mediator, where EA is communicating business opportunities to “positive” CI initiatives and aiming at stopping “negative” CI initiatives. An EA-based process tracing mechanism is suggested and demonstrated connecting business processes, ERP, and silo-based elements for CI initiatives. Furthermore, a CI project management tool is discussed to outline screening opportunities for EA-based CI reviews. An agenda is developed to ensure that CI projects are developed according to the Enterprise Architecture and developed along the organizational architecture and not as silo projects. Furthermore Enterprise Architecture is in such case not alone to induce changes and EA must develop methods to synchronise and coordinate with other change processes.

Keywords

Enterprise Architecture Business Process Management Continuous Improvement 

References

  1. 1.
    Khayami, R.: Qualitative characteristics of enterprise architecture. Procedia Comput. Sci. 3, 1277–1282 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernus, P.: Enterprise models for enterprise architecture and ISO9000:2000. Annu. Rev. Control 27, 211–220 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holm, H., Buschle, M., Ekstedt, M., Lagerström, R.: Automatic data collection for enterprise architecture models. Softw. Syst. Model. 13, 825–841 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jensen, C.T.: Integrating EA and BPM synergisticaly. In: IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, pp. 279–285 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lankhorst, M.M.: Enterprise architecture modelling - the issue of integration. Adv. Eng. Inform. 18, 205–2016 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eaidgah, Y., et al.: Visual management, performance management and continuous improvement: a lean manufacturing approach. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 7(2), 187–210 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh, J., Singh, H.: Continuous improvement philosophy–literature review and directions. Benchmarking Int. J. 22(1), 75–119 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, Y., Lee, P., Cheng, T.: Continuous improvement competence, employee creativity, and new service development performance: a frontline employee perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 171, 275–288 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Software Engineering Group (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students, 5th edn. Pearson Education, London. (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(3), 320–330 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldkuhl, G.: Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21(2), 135–146 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ross, J.W.: Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages. MIT CISR (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cram, A., Brohman, K., Gallupe, B.: Addressing the control challenges of the enterprise architecture process. J. Inf. Syst. 29(2), 161–182 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rajabi, Z., Abade, M.N.: Data-centric enterprise architecture. Inf. Eng. Electron. Bus. 4(4), 53–60 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shuja, A.K.: Enterprise Architecture: What is it and why should we care? (2016). http://www.shuja.info/publications.html
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    van Steenbergen, M., van den Berg, M., Brinkkemper, S.: A balanced approach to developing the enterprise architecture practice. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J., Cardoso, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2007. LNBIP, vol. 12, pp. 240–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88710-2_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dietz, J.L., Hoogervorst, J.A., Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Babkin, E., Barjis, J., Caetano, A., Huysmans, P., Iijima, J., van Kervel, S., Mulder, H.: The discipline of enterprise engineering. Int. J. Organ. Des. Eng. 3(1), 86–114 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hope, T., Chew, E., Sharma, R.: The failure of success factors: lessons from success and failure cases of enterprise architecture implementation. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research, pp. 21–27. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seppänen, V.: From problems to critical success factors of enterprise architecture adoption. Ph.D. dissertation, Jyväskylä Studies in Computing, p. 201 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hines, P., Taylor, D., Walsh, A.: The Lean journey: have we got it wrong? Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 1–18 (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McCann, L., Hassard, J.S., Granter, E., Hyde, P.J.: Casting the lean spell: the promotion, dilution and erosion of lean management in the NHS. Hum. Relat. 68(10), 1557–1577 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Näslund, D.: Lean, six sigma and lean sigma: fads or real process improvement methods? Bus. Process Manag. J. 14(3), 269–287 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Trkman, P.: Increasing process orientation with business process management: critical practices’. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33(1), 48–60 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bækgaard, L., Olsen, M., Tambo, T.: Architectural issues related to feral information systems. In: Feral Information Systems Development: Managerial Implications. Business Science Reference, pp. 227–241 (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rouhani, B.D.: A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies. Inf. Softw. Technol. 62, 1–20 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    von Rosing, M., Hove, M., Subbarao, R. Preston, T.W.: Combining BPM and EA in complex IT projects, pp. 271–278. Computer Society (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    Barros, A., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Service interaction patterns. In: van der Aalst, Wil M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 302–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11538394_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Clausen, N.: ERP and BPM - a report tool for measuring level of alignment. Aarhus University (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gartner Inc.: Bimodal (2014). http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/bimodal/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aarhus UniversityHerningDenmark
  2. 2.HerningDenmark

Personalised recommendations