Experiencing Expectations: Extending the Concept of UX Anticipation

  • Thomas LindgrenEmail author
  • Magnus Bergquist
  • Sarah Pink
  • Martin Berg
  • Vaike Fors
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 326)


This paper demonstrates the role of pre-product user experience (UX) in product design. For automotive companies, questions concerning how users will experience not yet available products is pressing - due to an increase in UX design for products, combined with a decrease in time-to-market for new products. Conventional UX research provides insights through investigating specific situated moments during use, or users’ reflections after use, yet cannot provide knowledge about how users will engage with not yet existing products. To understand pre-product UX we undertook a netnographic study of three people’s experiences of expecting and owning a Tesla car. We identified how modes of anticipation evolve before using the actual car, through online social interaction, creating a pre-product experience. The study offers a foundation for theorizing pre-product UX as socially generated anticipated UX, as well as insights for UX design in industry.


User experience Expectations Automotive Anticipation 


  1. 1.
    Gao, P., Kaas, H.-W., Mohr, D., Wee, D.: Automotive revolution: perspective towards 2030: how the convergence of disruptive technology-driven trends could transform the auto industry. Advanced Industries. McKinsey and Company, Advanced Industries (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yogasara, T., Popovic, V., Kraal, B.J., Chamorro-Koc, M.: General characteristics of anticipated user experience (AUX) with interactive products. In: Proceedings of IASDR2011: The 4th World Conference on Design Research: Diversity and Unity, IASDR, pp. 1–11 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Law, E.L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 719–728. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pohlmeyer, A.E., Hecht, M., Blessing, L.: User experience lifecycle model ContinUE [Continuous user experience]. In: Der Mensch im Mittepunkt technischer Systeme. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI Reihe, vol. 22, pp. 314–317 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., Hoonhout, J.: User experience white paper–bringing clarity to the concept of user experience (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25, 91–97 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M.: Now let’s do it in practice: user experience evaluation methods in product development. In: CHI 2008 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy, pp. 3961–3964. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Allam, A., Dahlan, H.M.: User experience: challenges and opportunities. J. Inf. Syst. Res. Innov. 3, 28–36 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Martens, J.-B.: User experience over time: an initial framework. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 729–738. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minge, M., Thüring, M.: Hedonic and pragmatic halo effects at early stages of user experience. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 109, 13–25 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pettersson, I.: The temporality of in-vehicle user experience. Division Design & Human Factors Department of Product and Production Development. Chalmers University of Technology (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Svangren, M.K., Skov, M.B., Kjeldskov, J.: The connected car: an empirical study of electric cars as mobile digital devices. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Vienna, Austria, pp. 1–12. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pink, S., Ardèvol, E., Lanzeni, D.: Digital materiality. In: Pink, S., Ardevol, E., Lanzeni, D. (eds.) Digital Materialities: Design and Anthropology, Bloomsbury, London, pp. 1–26 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dourish, P.: Responsibilities and implications: further thoughts on ethnography and design. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing for User eXperiences, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 2–16. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kozinets, R.V.: Netnography. In: The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society. Wiley (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bødker, S.: When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles, pp. 1–8. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L.: Service-dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements. Mark. Theory 6, 281–288 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garbarino, E., Johnson, M.S.: The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. J. Mark. 63, 70–87 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Immonen, M., Sintonen, S., Koivuniemi, J.: The value of human interaction in service channels. Comput. Hum. Behav. 78, 316–325 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lyyra, A.K., Koskinen, K.M.: The ambivalent characteristics of connected, digitised products: case Tesla Model S. In: Lundh Snis, U. (ed.) SCIS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 259, pp. 57–69. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gomes, C.C., Preto, S.: Artificial intelligence and interaction design for a positive emotional user experience. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T. (eds.) IHSI 2018. AISC, vol. 722, pp. 62–68. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ergonomics of human system interaction - Part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), vol. ISO 9241-210 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eilu, E.: Using cognitive psychology to understand anticipated user experience in computing products. In: Mobile Platforms, Design, and Apps for Social Commerce, pp. 175–196. IGI Global (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goh, K.-Y., Heng, C.-S., Lin, Z.: Social media brand community and consumer behavior: quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Inf. Syst. Res. 24, 88–107 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tavory, I., Eliasoph, N.: Coordinating futures: toward a theory of anticipation. Am. J. Sociol. 118(4), 908–942 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hassenzahl, M.: The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In: Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. HCIS, vol. 3, pp. 31–42. Springer, Dordrecht (2005). Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hassenzahl, M., Schöbel, M., Trautmann, T.: How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: the role of regulatory focus. Interact. Comput. 20, 473–479 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zucchi, K.: What Makes Tesla’s Business Model Different? Investopedia (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hewer, P., Brownlie, D.: Cultures of consumption of car aficionados: aesthetics and consumption communities. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 27, 106–119 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schembri, S., Latimer, L.: Online brand communities: constructing and co-constructing brand culture. J. Mark. Manag. 32, 628–651 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Lindgren
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Magnus Bergquist
    • 1
  • Sarah Pink
    • 3
  • Martin Berg
    • 4
  • Vaike Fors
    • 1
  1. 1.Halmstad UniversityHalmstadSweden
  2. 2.Volvo Car CorporationGöteborgSweden
  3. 3.School of Media and CommunicationRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Computer Science and Media TechnologyMalmö UniversityMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations