Abstract
Police interrogation is a highly scripted process in which every statement and action is designed to contribute to the illusion that confessing is in the suspect’s best interest. Police also interrogate by proxy: using lay collaborators to elicit confessions from friends, family, fellow criminals or prisoners, and even strangers. In turn, deceptive strategies target judges and juries to convey the impression that the confession is both true (to ensure conviction) and voluntary (to ensure the confession is admitted as evidence). This chapter reviews these deceptive processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alter, V. (2005). Jailhouse informants: A lesson in e-snitching. Journal of Technology Law & Policy,10, 223–243.
Bloom, R. M. (2002). Ratting: The use and abuse of informants in the American justice system. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Cassidy, R. M. (2004). Soft words of hope: Giglio, accomplice witnesses, and the problem of implied inducements. North Western University Law Review,98, 1–43.
Cialdini, R. A. (2008). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Davis, D. (2008). Selling confession: The interrogator, the con man, and their weapons of influence. Wisconsin Defender,16(1), 1–16.
Davis, D. (2010). Lies, damned lies, and the path from police interrogation to wrongful conviction. In M. H. Gonzales, C. Tavris, & J. Aronson (Eds.), The scientist and the humanist: A festschrift in honor of Elliot Aronson (pp. 211–247). New York, NY, USA: Psychology Press.
Davis, D., & Leo, R. A. (2014). The problem of interrogation-induced false confession: Sources of failure in prevention and detection. In S. Morewitz & M. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of forensic sociology and psychology (pp. 47–75). New York: Springer.
Davis, D., Leo, R. A., & Follette, W. C. (2010). Selling confession: Setting the stage with the “sympathetic detective with a time-limited offer”. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice,26(4), 441–457.
Davis, D., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2004). The road to perdition: Extreme influence tactics in the interrogation room. In W. T. O’Donohue & E. Levensky (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 897–996). New York, NY: Elsevier Academic Press.
Davis, D., & Villalobos, J. G. (2014). Language and the law: Illustrations from cases of disputed sexual consent. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 438–458). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review,82, 891–1007.
Garrett, B. L. (2011). Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Giglio v. United States, 405 US 150. (1972). 405 US 150.
Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Justice Project. (2007). Jailhouse snitch testimony: A policy review. Washington, DC: The Justice Project.
Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist,52(3), 221–233.
Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior,34, 3–38.
Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A. M., et al. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior,31(4), 381–400.
Lavine, E. (1930). The third degree: A detailed and appalling expose of police brutality. New York, NY: Garden City.
Lavine, E. (1936). Secrets of the metropolitan police. New York: Garden City.
Leo, R. A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology,86(2), 266–303.
Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leo, R. A., & Davis, D. (2010). From false confession to wrongful conviction: Seven psychological processes. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law,38, 10–56.
Mazur, E. P. (2002). Rational expectations of leniency: Implicit plea agreements and the prosecutor’s role as a minister of justice. Duke Law Journal,51, 1333.
Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. R., Michael, S. W., Evans, J. R., Camilletti, C. R., Bhatt, S., et al. (2014). Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology,10(4), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6.
Miller, J. M. (2011). Becoming an informant. Justice Quarterly,28(2), 203–220.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 336. (1966).
Natapoff, A. (2009). Snitching: Criminal informants and the erosion of American justice. New York: New York University Press.
Neuschatz, J. S., Lawson, D. S., Swanner, J. K., Meissner, C. A., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2008). The effects of accomplice witnesses and jailhouse informants on jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior,32(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9100-1.
Scherr, K. C., & Madon, S. (2013). “Go ahead and sign”: An experimental examination of Miranda waivers and comprehension. Law and Human Behavior,37(3), 208–218.
Shuy, R. W. (1997). The language of confession, interrogation, and deception (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
The Innocence Project [innocenceproject]. (2011, July 15). Getting it right: Informants. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM700n64Bx8.
The Innocence Project. (2017). DNA exonerations in the United States. Retrieved June 20, 2017 from https://www.innocenceproject.org/dna-exonerations-in-the-united-states/.
Thomas, G. C. I. (1996). Plain talk about the Miranda empirical debate: A “steady-state” theory of confessions. UCLA Law Review,43, 933–959.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2005). The Drug enforcement administration’s payments to confidential sources. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Villalobos, J. G., Kemmelmeier, M., & Zimmerman, C. A. (2018). Trust in the law: Why authoritarians are more likely to recommend falsely confessing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Warden, R. (2004). The snitch system: How incentivized witnesses put 38 innocent Americans on death row. Northwestern University School of Law. Center on Wrongful Convictions, 1–16.
Wetmore, S. A., Neuschatz, J. S., & Gronlund, S. D. (2014). On the power of secondary confession evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law,20(4), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.777963.
Wicklander-Zulawski & Associates, Inc. (2017). Wicklander-Zulawski discontinues Reid Method instruction after more than 30 years [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.w-z.com/portfolio_category/wz-news/.
Wilson, J. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Livingston, T.N., Rerick, P.O., Villalobos, J.G., Davis, D. (2019). Deception Induced Confession: Strategies of Police Interrogators and Their Lay Collaborators. In: Docan-Morgan, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96333-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96334-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)