Contribution of the Stamp Model to Accident Analysis: Offloading Operations on a Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO)

  • Dahlia Oueidat
  • Thibaut Eude
  • Franck Guarnieri
Part of the Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications book series (ASTSA)


The System Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) is a new approach developed at MIT (Leveson N: Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety., 2011) to analyse risks and prevent accidents in industries. STAMP draws upon theories that were developed in the mid-twentieth century in the fields of systems engineering and cybernetics. The approach provides the steps to follow to evaluate industrial system and to identify or design at the operational level the work tasks performed by its controlling systems (automated, or semi-automated with a human supervisor). The accident analyses approach proposed,in this article, differs from the paradigm normally used in the oil and gas installations in that it provides a comprehensive review of the industrial system. The analyses aims to inspect technical, human and organizational factors involved in an accident. In this chapter, the STAMP model is used to analyse the accident that happened on a Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) unit in the Gulf of Guinea.


  1. Dong A (2012) Application of CAST and STPA to railroad safety in China. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  2. Hickey J (2012) A system theoretic safety analysis of U.S. Coast Guard Aviation Mishap Involving CG-6505. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  3. Kim T-e, Nazir S, Øvergård KI (2016) A STAMP-based causal analysis of the Korean Sewol ferry accident. Safety Science 83:93–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kwon Y (2015) System theoretic safety analysis of the Sewol-Ho Ferry Accident in South Korea. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  5. Leveson N (2011) Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety.
  6. Leveson N (2016) Rasmussen’s legacy: a paradigm change in engineering for safety. Appl Ergon. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. OGP Safety Committee (2006) Guideline for managing marine risks associated with FPSOs.
  8. Oueidat D, Guarnieri F, Garbolino E, Rigaud E (2015) Evaluating the safety operations procedures of an LPG storage and distribution plant with STAMP. Procedia Eng 128:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stoop J, Benner L Jr (2015) What do STAMP-based analysts expect from safety investigations? Procedia Eng 128:93–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Underwood P, Waterson P (2014) Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg Train Derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP models. Accid Anal Prev 68(juillet):75–94. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Underwood P, Waterson P, Braithwaite G (2016) ‘Accident investigation in the wild’ – a small-scale, field-based evaluation of the STAMP method for accident analysis. Saf Sci 82(février):129–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Yang Q, Tian J (2015) A formal approach to causal analysis based on STAMP (CAST). In

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dahlia Oueidat
    • 1
  • Thibaut Eude
    • 1
  • Franck Guarnieri
    • 1
  1. 1.MINES ParisTech/PSL Research University, CRCSophia Antipolis CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations