Advertisement

System Dynamics Applied to the Human, Technical and Organizational Factors of Industrial Safety

  • Hafida Bouloiz
  • Emmanuel Garbolino
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications book series (ASTSA)

Abstract

In this chapter, system dynamics is applied to a socio-technical system in the chemical industry. The objective is to develop a dynamic model of the industrial system, which formalizes the causal interdependencies between the factors that define the safety conditions for that system. A systemic approach is applied to the case study of an chemical storage facility. The implementation, which is supported by Vensim® software, makes it possible to include the human, technical and organizational factors that all contribute to safety management (Bouloiz et al. 2013).

References

  1. Bonjour E, Dulmet M (2002) Articulation entre pilotage des systèmes de compétences et gestion des connaissances. 1er colloque de gestion des compétences et des connaissances en génie industriel, Nantes, 12–13 décembre, pp 43–50Google Scholar
  2. Boucher X, Burlat P (2003) Vers l’intégration des compétences dans le pilotage des performances de l’entreprise. JESA 37(3):363–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouloiz H, Garbolino E, Tkiouat M, Guarnieri F (2013) A system dynamics model for behavioral analysis of safety conditions in a chemical storage unit. Saf Sci 58:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cesar M (2005) Le processus d’apprentissage organisationnel: vers de nouveaux modes d’apprentissage et de gestion des compétences. Actes du 7ème Colloque International de Psychologie Sociale, ADRIPS, RennesGoogle Scholar
  5. Denis-Remis C (2007) Approche de la maitrise des risques par la formation des acteurs. Thèse de doctorat. Ecole des Mines de ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 464Google Scholar
  7. Frere R (2000) Contribution à l’intégration d’aspects humains dans la modélisation des systèmes de fabrication : vers une gestion conjointe des ressources humaines et de la production. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambrésis, Valenciennes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  8. Giambiasi N, Frydman C, Seck M (2005) Modélisation et simulation du comportement humain avec le formalisme devs. In Actes de 6ème Conférence Francophone de Modélisation et Simulation (MOSIM’06), MarocGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart P, Cooper C (2001) Occupational stress: toward a more integrated framework, vol 2, chapitre Handbook of industrial work and organizational psychology. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones C (2005) Behavioral theory in simulation: ambiguous results from simple relationships. In: Proceedings the 23rd international conference of the System Dynamics Society, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 70(1):71–79Google Scholar
  12. Karsky M, Donnadieu G (1990) The dynamic of behavior and motivation. In: Proceeding of the international system conference, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Marchand A, Demers A, Durand P (2005) Does work really cause distress? The contribution of occupational structure and work organization to the experience of psychological distress. Soc Sci Med 60:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 25:54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. VENSIM (1999) Reference manual version 4, Ventana System, IncGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecole Nationale des Sciences AppliquéesAgadirMorocco
  2. 2.MINES ParisTech/PSL Research University, CRCSophia Antipolis CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations