Skip to main content

UX Research Methods for Designing Interactive Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interaction in Digital News Media
  • 771 Accesses

Abstract

User Experience (UX) is critical to the success of interactive media products. Successful product development depends on deeply understanding users in order to ensure product utility, usability, and desirability. By putting users at the center of the product development process, UX research establishes who the user is, the context they in which will use the product, and what they want from the product. UX research is also used to evaluate the user experience to confirm that users can interact with product features efficiently, effectively, and satisfactorily. Overall, UX research improves our understanding, informs design, and validates design decisions. This chapter describes several methods employed in UX research to define and evaluate the user experience of interactive media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anttonen, J., and V. Surakka. 2005. Emotions and Heart Rate While Sitting on a Chair. In Proceedings of CHI 2005 Conference, April 2–7, ACM, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, J., and M. Burrell. 2009. An Ethnographic Approach to Design. In Human-Computer Interaction: Development Process, ed. A. Sears and J. Jacko, 71–94. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojko, A. 2013. Eye Tracking the User Experience: A Practical Guide to Research. New York: Rosenfeld Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I., and P. Groenen. 1997. Multi-Trait-Multimethod by Multidimensional Scaling. SoftStat 97: 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, J. 1996. SUS: A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. In Usability Evaluation in Industry, ed. P. Jordan, B. Thomas, and B. Weerdmeester, 189–194. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J.T., R.E. Petty, M.E. Losch, and H.S. Kim. 1986. Electromyographic Activity Over Facial Muscle Regions Can Differentiate the Valence and Intensity of Affective Reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (2): 260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courage, C., and K. Baxter. 2015. Understanding Your Users: A Practical Guide to User Requirements Methods, Tools, and Techniques. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Sciences. 2006. Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines. http://www.usability.gov/guidelines/. Accessed March 14, 2018.

  • Dumas, J.S., and M.C. Salzman. 2006. Usability Assessment Methods. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics 2 (1): 109–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., and W. Friesen. 1978. The Facial Action Coding System (FACS): A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Action. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.G., and L.E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, ed. P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, 139–183. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl, M., and N. Sandweg. 2004. From Mental Effort to Perceived Usability: Transforming Experiences Into Summary Assessments. In CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1283–1286, April, ACM, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjortsjö, C.H. 1969. Man’s Face and Mimic Language. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzblatt, K., and H. Beyer. 2016. Contextual Design: Design for Life, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B., and M. Wish. 1978. Multidimensional Scaling, vol. 11. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kula, I., R. Atkinson, R. Branaghan, and R.D. Roscoe. 2017. Assessing User Experience via Biometric Sensor Affect Detection. In End-User Considerations in Educational Technology Design, ed. R.D. Roscoe, S.D. Craig, and I. Douglas, 123–139. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J.R. 1995. IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7 (1): 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J.R. 2012. Usability Testing. In Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 4th ed., 1267–1312. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandryk, R.L., K.M. Inkpen, and T.W. Calvert. 2006. Using Psychophysiological Techniques to Measure User Experience with Entertainment Technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology 25 (2): 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. 1994. Heuristic Evaluation. In Usability Inspection Methods, ed. J. Nielsen and R.L. Mack, 25–62. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D., and S.W. Draper (eds.). 1986. User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A., and R. Verganti. 2014. Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change. Design Issues 30 (1): 78–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, C.L. 2008. A Modified Delphi Approach to a New Card Sorting Methodology. Journal of Usability Studies 4 (1): 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Montoro, M., and Ll Codina. 2017. Navigation Design and SEO for Content-Intensive Websites: A Guide for an Efficient Digital Communication. Oxford: Elsevier (Chandos).

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, R.F., and P. Bolls. 2011. Psychophysiological Measurement and Meaning: Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Media. New York and London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, R.F., and J.R. Keene. 2012. The Effect of Sports Fan Identification on the Cognitive Processing of Sports News. International Journal of Sport Communication 5 (3): 348–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Righi, C., J. James, M. Beasley, D.L. Day, J.E. Fox, J. Gieber, C. Howe, and L. Ruby. 2013. Card Sort Analysis Best Practices. Journal of Usability Studies 8 (3): 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, E.B.-N. 2002. From User-Centered to Participatory Design Approaches. In Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections, ed. J. Frascara, 1–8. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soranzo, A., and D. Cooksey. 2015. Testing Taxonomies: Beyond Card Sorting. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology 41 (5): 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, D. 2009. Card Sorting: Designing Usable Categories. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullis, T., and B. Albert. 2013. Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullis, T., and L.E. Wood. 2004. How Many Users Are Enough for a Card-Sorting Study? In Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Association Conference, June 7–11, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • User Experience Basics. n.d. Retrieved from https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/user-experience.html. Accessed April 3, 2018.

  • Vicente, K.J., D.C. Thornton, and N. Moray. 1987. Spectral Analysis of Sinus Arrhythmia: A Measure of Mental Effort. Human Factors 29 (2): 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R.D., and P.H. Marsden. 2003. Physiological Responses to Different WEB Page Designs. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (1–2): 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. (ed.). 2009. User Experience Re-Mastered: Your Guide to Getting the Right Design. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G.M., and M.A. Sasse. 2000. Do Users Always Know What’s Good for Them? Utilising Physiological Responses to Assess Media Quality. In People and Computers XIV—Usability or Else!, 327–339. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, K., P. Bolls, J. Myers, and M. Sternadori. 2009. When Words Collide Online: How Writing Style and Video Intensity Affect Cognitive Processing of Online News. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 53 (4): 532–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Millet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Millet, B. (2018). UX Research Methods for Designing Interactive Media. In: Pérez-Montoro, M. (eds) Interaction in Digital News Media. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96253-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics