Mapping Paradigms of Social Sciences: Application of Network Analysis

  • Dmitry ZaytsevEmail author
  • Daria Drozdova
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 247)


In this paper, we propose to utilize the methods of network analysis to analyze the relationship between various elements that constitute any particular research in social sciences. Four levels that determine a design of the research can be established: ontological and epistemological assumptions that determine what is the reality under the study and how can we obtain the knowledge about it; a general methodological frame that defines the object of the study and a spectrum of research questions we are allowed to pose; and, finally, a list of methods that we might use in order to get answers. All these levels are interrelated, sometimes in very confusing way. We propose to extract a preliminary set of relations between various elements from textbooks on methodology of social and political sciences and to visualize and analyze their relations using network analytic methods.


Social science methodology Network analysis Philosophy of science Political science methodology Paradigms Quantitative and qualitative methods 



The authors express their gratitude to Dr. Valentina Kuskova, Head of International Laboratory for Applied Network Research, who has been supervising this research from the initial idea to the final version.

Funding The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of a subsidy by the Russian Academic Excellence Project ‘5-100.’


  1. 1.
    Huntington, S.P.: The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman and London (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., Robinson, J.A.: Democracy Does Cause Growth (2015). Assessed 18 Aug 2017
  3. 3.
    Moses, J.W., Knutsen, T.L.: Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research. Palgrave Macmillan (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Denzin, N.K.: The Research Act in Sociology. Butterworth, London (1970)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silverman, D.: Qualitative Methodology and Sociology: Describing the Social World. Gowel, Aldershot (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Della Porta, D., Keating, M.: Approaches and Methodologies in Social Sciences. Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abbott, A.: Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. University of Chicago, Chicago (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Box-Steffensmeier, J.M., Brady, H.E., Collier, D. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. The Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marsh, D., Stoker, G.: Theory and Methods in Political Science. Palgrave Macmillan (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhu, M., Kuskova, V., Wasserman, S., Contractor, N.: Correspondence analysis of multirelational multilevel network affiliations. In: Lazega, E., Snijders, T.A.B. (Eds.) Multilevel Network Analysis for the Social Sciences. Methodos Series, vol. 12, pp. 145–172 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goodin, R.E.: The state of the discipline, the discipline of the state. In: Goodin, R.E. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. The Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher School of EconomicsNational Research UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations