Skip to main content

Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Biodiversity Conservation and Productivity in the Context of Increasing Demands on Landscapes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Ecosystem Services

Abstract

A growing human population coupled with increasing per capita consumption, changing diets, increasing food waste, and ineffective regulation, have led to rising demands on ecosystems for the services they supply [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, et al. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv. 2012;151:53–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Seppelt R, Manceur AM, Liu J, Fenichel EP, Klotz S. Synchronized peak-rate years of global resources use. Ecol Soc. 2014;19:50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Václavík T, Lautenbach S, Kuemmerle T, Seppelt R. Mapping global land system archetypes. Glob Environ Chang. 2013;23:1637–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harfoot M, Tittensor DP, Newbold T, McInerny G, Smith MJ, Scharlemann JP. Integrated assessment models for ecologists: the present and the future. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2014;23:124–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearson CJ. Regenerative, semiclosed systems: a priority for twenty-first-century agriculture. Bioscience. 2007;57:409–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seppelt R, Beckmann M, Ceauşu S, Cord AF, Gerstner K, Gurevitch J, et al. Harmonizing biodiversity conservation and productivity in the context of increasing demands on landscapes. BioScience. 2016;66(10):890–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, et al. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett. 2007;10:299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayami Y. On the use of the Cobb-Douglas production function on the cross-country analysis of agricultural production. Am J Agric Econ. 1970;52:327–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ihse M. Swedish agricultural landscapes—patterns and changes during the last 50 years, studied by aerial photos. Landsc Urban Plan. 1995;31:21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerstner K, Dormann CF, Stein A, Manceur AM, Seppelt R. Effects of land use on plant diversity – a global meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol. 2014;51:1690–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koh LP, Ghazoul J. A matrix-calibrated species-area model for predicting biodiversity losses due to land-use change. Conserv Biol. 2010;24:994–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pereira HM, Daily GC. Modeling biodiversity dynamics in countryside landscapes. Ecology. 2006;87:1877–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kleijn D, Kohler F, Báldi A, Batáry P, Concepción ED, Clough Y, et al. On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proc Biol Sci. 2009;276:903–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Perfecto I, Vandermeer J. Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1134:173–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett. 2005;8:857–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sodhi NS, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW. A meta-analysis of the impact of anthropogenic forest disturbance on southeast Asia’s biotas. Biotropica. 2009;41:103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Finn JA, Kirwan L, Connolly J, Sebastià MT, Helgadottir A, Baadshaug OH, et al. Ecosystem function enhanced by combining four functional types of plant species in intensively managed grassland mixtures: a 3-year continental-scale field experiment. J Appl Ecol. 2013;50:365–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Storkey J, Meyer S, Still KS, Leuschner C. The impact of agricultural intensification and land-use change on the European arable flora. Proc Biol Sci. 2012;279(1732):1421–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc Biol Sci. 2001;268:25–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Seppelt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Seppelt, R. et al. (2019). Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Biodiversity Conservation and Productivity in the Context of Increasing Demands on Landscapes. In: Schröter, M., Bonn, A., Klotz, S., Seppelt, R., Baessler, C. (eds) Atlas of Ecosystem Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics