Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Atlas of Ecosystem Services pp 215–223Cite as

How Good Are Bad Species?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Many non-native species have been introduced because they provide one or more ecosystem service. As some of these species also cause disservices, case-by-case approaches are required to assess risks vs. opportunities related to their spread.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jeschke JM, Pyšek P. Tens rule. In: Jeschke JM, Heger T, editors. Invasion biology: hypotheses and evidence. Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2018. p. 124–132.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011;26:333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Keller RP, Geist J, Jeschke JM, Kühn I. Invasive species in Europe: ecology, status, and policy. Environ Sci Eur. 2011;23:23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vilà M, Basnou C, Pyšek P, Josefsson M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, et al. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front Ecol Environ. 2010;8(3):135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kettunen M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Pagad S, Starfinger U, Brink P, et al. Technical support to EU strategy on invasive species (IS): assessment of the impact of IS in Europe and the EU (Final Module Report for the European Commission). Brussels, Belgium.: Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP); 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reinhardt F, Herle M, Bastiansen F, Streit B. Ökonomische Folgen der Ausbreitung von Neobiota. UBA-Texte. 2003;79/03:1–248.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pimentel D. Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal, and microbe species. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Faccoli M, Gatto P. Analysis of costs and benefits of Asian longhorned beetle eradication in Italy. Forestry. 2016;89(3):301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lambdon PW, Pyšek P, Basnou C, Hejda M, Arianoutsou M, Essl F, et al. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia. 2008;80(2):101–149.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seebens H, Essl F, Dawson W, Fuentes N, Moser D, Pergl J, et al. Global trade will accelerate plant invasions in emerging economies under climate change. Glob Chang Biol. 2015;21(11):4128–4140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katsanevakis S, Wallentinus I, Zenetos A, Leppäkoski E, Çinar ME, Oztürk B, et al. Impacts of invasive alien marine species on ecosystem services and biodiversity: a pan-European review. Aquat Invasions. 2014;9(4):391–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Muñoz Escobar M, Voyevoda M, Fühner C, Zehnsdorf A. Potential uses of Elodea nuttallii-harvested biomass. Energy Sustain Soc. 2011;1(4):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zehnsdorf A, Hussner A, Eismann F, Ronicke H, Melzer A. Management options of invasive Elodea nuttallii and Elodea canadensis. Limnologica. 2015;51:110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kowarik I. Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollut. 2011;159(8–9):1974–1983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sladonja B, Sušek M, Guillermic J. Review on invasive tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle) conflicting values: assessment of its ecosystem services and potential biological threat. Environ Manag. 2015;56(4):1009–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sato M, Nishijima S, Miyashita T. Differences in refuge function for prey and tolerance to crayfish among macrophyte species. Limnology. 2014;15(1):27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. http://www.europe-aliens.org. Accessed 23 Oct 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany

    Sonja Knapp

  2. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, sDiv - Synthesis Centre, Leipzig, Germany

    Marten Winter

  3. Centre for Environmental Biotechnology (UBZ), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    Andreas Zehnsdorf

  4. Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Halle, Germany

    Ingolf Kühn

Authors
  1. Sonja Knapp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marten Winter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas Zehnsdorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ingolf Kühn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Knapp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecosystem Services, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    Matthias Schröter

  2. Department of Ecosystem Services, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    Aletta Bonn

  3. Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Halle, Germany

    Stefan Klotz

  4. Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    Ralf Seppelt

  5. Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Halle, Germany

    Cornelia Baessler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Knapp, S., Winter, M., Zehnsdorf, A., Kühn, I. (2019). How Good Are Bad Species?. In: Schröter, M., Bonn, A., Klotz, S., Seppelt, R., Baessler, C. (eds) Atlas of Ecosystem Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation