Skip to main content

The Ecosystem Service Concept: Linking Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Which ecosystem services are addressed? General introduction to the ecosystem service concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reid WV. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis: a report of the millenium ecosystems assessment. Washington DC: Island Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich A. Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. New York: Random House; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. von Haaren C, Albert C. Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage. 2011;7(3):150–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Groot RS. Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Dordrecht: Wolters-Noordhoff; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daily GC. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 1997;387(6630):253–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. TEEB. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: asynthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB 2010. http://doc.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/TEEB%20Synthesis%20Report%202010.pdf

  8. Convention on Biological Diversity. COP 10 Decision X/2. Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020. https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.

  9. European Commission. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244. Brussels, Belgium: 2011. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52011DC0244. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.

  10. Schröter M, Albert C, Marques A, Tobon W, Lavorel S, Maes J, et al. National ecosystem assessments in Europe: a review. BioScience. 2016;66(10):813–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spangenberg JH, Görg C, Truong DT, Tekken V, Bustamante JV, Settele J. Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage. 2014;10(1):40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldman RL, Tallis H, Kareiva P, Daily GC. Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(27):9445–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abson DJ, von Wehrden H, Baumgärtner S, Fischer J, Hanspach J, Härdtle W, et al. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecol Econ. 2014;103(0):29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Norgaard RB. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol Econ. 2010;69(6):1219–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Raymond CM, Singh GG, Benessaiah K, Bernhardt JR, Levine J, Nelson H, et al. Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. BioScience. 2013;63(7):536–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, et al. The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 2015;14(0):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maes J, Hauck J, Paracchini ML, Ratamäki O, Hutchins M, Termansen M, et al. Mainstreaming ecosystem services into EU policy. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 2013;5(1):128–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, et al. A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;22(Part B):213–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ricketts TH, Watson KB, Koh I, Ellis AM, Nicholson CC, Posner S, et al. Disaggregating the evidence linking biodiversity and ecosystem services. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maron M, Mitchell MGE, Runting RK, Rhodes JR, Mace GM, Keith DA, et al. Towards a threat assessment framework for ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017;32(4):240–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ring I, Wüstemann H, Bonn A, Grunewald K, Hampicke U, Hartje V, et al. Methodische Grundlagen zu Ökosystemleistungen und ökonomischer Bewertung. In: Hartje V, Wüstemann H, Bonn A, editors. Naturkapital Deutschland—TEEB DE: Naturkapital und Klimapolitik—Synergien und Konflikte. Berlin, Leipzig: TU Berlin, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung; 2015. p. 20–64.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barton DN, Ring I, Rusch G. Policyscapes: nature-based policy mixes for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision. Policy Brief. 2014;2 http://policymix.nina.no/News/News-article/ArticleId/3464/Policyscapes-Nature-based-policy-mixes-for-biodiversity-conservation

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Schröter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schröter, M., Ring, I., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Bonn, A. (2019). The Ecosystem Service Concept: Linking Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing. In: Schröter, M., Bonn, A., Klotz, S., Seppelt, R., Baessler, C. (eds) Atlas of Ecosystem Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics