Bros v. Hos: Postfeminism, Anti-feminism and the Toxic Turn in Digital Gender Politics

  • Debbie GingEmail author


In recent years, digital media have facilitated a revival of feminist ideas and campaigns, as well as a virulent and especially toxic new strand of anti-feminism. The new anti-feminism has been attributed to a number of factors, including the technological affordances of social media, the changing socio-cultural realities of men’s lives and the affective potency of a new “cultural politics of emotion” (Ahmed 2013). While acknowledging the validity of these explanations, this chapter argues that the role of postfeminism has been largely overlooked, both in the rise of men’s rights activists and in the shaping of digital gender politics more generally. I contend that the dominance of a postfeminist cultural sensibility in Western society for the past decade or more has functioned as a logical precursor to the emergence and shaping of toxic masculinity politics. This, in turn, has provoked feminist responses that, while often impressive and sometimes effective, are also potentially constrained by the mutually synergetic dynamics of individualism, neoliberal capitalism and the algorithmic politics of social media. In 2015, Rachel O’Neill asked, “Can the logic of postfeminism be mobilized by men to (re)secure male power and privilege?” This chapter responds to O’Neill’s question, using digital men’s rights to demonstrate how this is happening.


  1. Ahmed, S. (2013). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bly, R. (1992). Iron John. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Bumiller, K. (2013). Feminist Collaboration with the State in Response to Sexual Violence: Lessons from the American Experience. In A. M. Tripp, M. Marx Ferree, & C. Ewing (Eds.), Gender, Violence, and Human Security: Critical Feminist Perspectives (pp. 191–213). New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgess, J. (2006). Hearing Ordinary Voices: Cultural Studies, Vernacular Creativity and Digital Storytelling. Continuum, 20(2), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgess, J., & Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2016). Mapping Sociocultural Controversies Across Digital Media Platforms: One Week of# Gamergate on Twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dean, J. (2007). Feminism, Communicative Capitalism, and the Inadequacies of Radical Democracy. In Radical Democracy and the Internet (pp. 226–245). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Easter, B. (2018). “Feminist_Brevity_in_Light_of_Masculine_Long-Windedness:” Code, Space, and Online Misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2015). Technologies of Sexiness: Sex, Identity, and Consumer Culture. Sexuality, Identity, and Society.Google Scholar
  11. García-Favaro, L., & Gill, R. (2016). “Emasculation Nation has Arrived”: Sexism Rearticulated in Online Responses to Lose the Lads’ Mags Campaign. Feminist Media Studies, 16(3), 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gill, R. (2016). Post-Postfeminism?: New Feminist Visibilities in Postfeminist Times, Feminist. Media Studies, 16(4), 610–630.Google Scholar
  16. Gill, R. (2017). The Affective, Cultural and Psychic Life of Postfeminism: 10 Years On. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(6), 606–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (2013). New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Ging, D. (2009). All-Consuming Images: New Gender Formations in Post-Celtic-Tiger Ireland. In D. Ging, M. Cronin, & P. Kirby (Eds.), Transforming Ireland: Challenges, Critiques, Resources. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities, p. 1097184X17706401.Google Scholar
  20. Ging, D. (2018). Neologising Misogyny: Urban Dictionary’s Folksonomy of Sexual Abuse. Paper presented at Console-ing Passions, Bournemouth University, 12th July.Google Scholar
  21. Haywood, C., & Mac an Ghaill, M. (2003). Men and Masculinities: Theory, Research and Social Practice (p. 134). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hearn, J. (1993). The Politics of Essentialism and the Analysis of the ‘Men’s Movement (s)’. Feminism & Psychology, 3(3), 405–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jane, E. A. (2016). Online Misogyny and Feminist Digilantism. Continuum, 30(3), 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jane, E. A. (2018). Gendered Cyberhate as Workplace Harassment and Economic Vandalism. Feminist Media Studies, 1–17.Google Scholar
  25. Jeong, S. (2015). The Internet of Garbage. New York: Forbes Media.Google Scholar
  26. Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on# Occupy Everywhere: Social Media, Public Space, and Emerging Logics of Aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marwick, A. (2013, March 29). Donglegate: Why the Tech Community Hates Feminists. Wired. com, p. 29. Retrieved from
  28. Massanari, A. (2015). #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s Algorithm, Governance, and Culture Support Toxic Technocultures. New Media and Society, 19, 329–346. Scholar
  29. Massanari, A. L. (2018). Rethinking Research Ethics, Power, and the Risk of Visibility in the Era of the “Alt-right” Gaze. Social Media + Society, 4(2). Scholar
  30. Massanari, A. L., & Chess, S. (2018). Attack of the 50-Foot Social Justice Warrior: The Discursive Construction of SJW Memes as the Monstrous Feminine. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McRobbie, A. (2004). Post-Feminism and Popular Culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Messner, M. A. (1998). The Limits of ‘The Male Sex Role’ An Analysis of the Men’s Liberation and Men’s Rights Movements’ Discourse. Gender & Society, 12(3), 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Messner, M. A. (2016). Forks in the Road of Men’s Gender Politics: Men’s Rights vs Feminist Allies. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(2), 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Messner, M. A., & Montez de Oca, J. (2005). The Male Consumer as Loser: Beer and Liquor Ads in Mega Sports Media Events. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1879–1909.Google Scholar
  35. Nadesan, M. H. (2002). Engineering the Entrepreneurial Infant: Brain Science, Infant Development Toys, and Governmentality. Cultural Studies, 16(3), 401–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagle, A. (2015). An Investigation Into Contemporary Online Anti-Feminist Movements. PhD Thesis, Dublin City University.Google Scholar
  37. Nagle, A. (2016). The New Man of 4chan. The Baffler, 30, 64–76.Google Scholar
  38. Nagle, A. (2017). Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. Alresford: John Hunt Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. NicGhabhann, N. (2018). City Walls, Bathroom Stalls and Tweeting the Taoiseach: The Aesthetics of Protest and the Campaign for Abortion Rights in the Republic of Ireland. Continuum.
  40. O’Neill, R. (2015a). Whither Critical Masculinity Studies? Notes on Inclusive Masculinity Theory, Postfeminism, and Sexual Politics. Men and Masculinities, 18(1), 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Neill, R. (2015b). The Work of Seduction: Intimacy and Subjectivity in the London ‘Seduction Community’. Sociological Research Online, 20(4), 5. Retrieved from
  42. Paasonen, S. (2015). A Midsummer’s Bonfire: AFFECTIVE Intensities of Online Debate. In K. Hillis, S. Paasonen, & M. Petit (Eds.), Networked Affect (pp. 27–42). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics (p. 2015). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ringrose, J., & Lawrence, E. (2018). Remixing Misandry, Manspreading, and Dick Pics: Networked Feminist Humour on Tumblr. Feminist Media Studies, 1–19.Google Scholar
  45. Siapera, E., & Viejo-Otera, P. (2015). How Do Far-Right Movements and Parties Use the Internet and the Social Media? Digital Facebook Postcards, With Hate, Your Far Right. ISIS Summit Vienna 2015—The Information Society at the Crossroads.
  46. Silva, J. M. (2013). Coming Up Short. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tasker, Y., & Negra, D. (Eds.). (2007). Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Walter, N. (2011). Living Dolls: The Return of Sexism. London: Hachette.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations