Skip to main content

Groups, Parties and Credit-Claiming Dynamics: The Politics of Minimum Income in the Age of Austerity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Politics of Minimum Income

Part of the book series: Work and Welfare in Europe ((RECOWE))

  • 203 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter briefly retraces the strengths and limits of established welfare theories—functionalism, power resource theory, (historical) institutionalism and the diffusion of policy model—in relation to the two empirical and theoretical puzzles that lie at the core of this volume: explaining both path departure and policy reversal in minimum income reforms. To move beyond these approaches, it integrates the classic literature on political exchange intermediated by interest groups and parties with recent theoretical perspectives on the role of party competition, adapting both to the specific ‘political properties’ of minimum income schemes. Building on that, a new analytical and theoretical framework is introduced, that allows the interpretation of path departure, institutionalization, and policy reversal through different types of credit-claiming dynamics resulting from the encounter of socio-political demand (interest groups and voters) and political supply (political parties).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alber, J. (1981). Government Responses to the Challenge of Unemployment: The Development of Unemployment Insurance in Western Europe. In P. Flora and A. J. Heidenheimer (Eds.), Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. P., & Scruggs, L. (2004). Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 496–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, K., & Bonoli, G. (Eds.). (2005). The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Social Policies To New Social Risks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. A. (2010). Governing Social Inclusion. Europeanization Through Policy Co-ordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, C. (2013). The Electoral Consequences of Third Way Welfare State Reforms: Social Democracy’s Transformation and its Political Costs. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arriba, A., & Moreno, L. (2005). Spain—Poverty, Social Exclusion, and Safety Nets. In M. Ferrera (Ed.), Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe: Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccaro, L., Hamann, K., & Turner, L. (2003). The Politics of Labour Movement Revitalization: The Need for a Revitalized Perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relation, 9(1), 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahle, T. (2003). The Changing Institutionalisation of Social Services in England and Wales, France and Germany: Is the Welfare State on the Retreat? Journal of European Social Policy, 1, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahle, T., Hubl, V., & Pfeifer, M. (2011). The Last Safety Net. A Handbook of Minimum Income Protection in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, P. (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare States 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Banting, K. (1995). The Welfare State as Statescraft: Territorial Politics and Canadian Social Policy. In S. Liebfried & P. Pierson (Eds.), European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F., & Leech, B. (1998). Basic Interests. The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D. (2005). Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 30(18), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D. (2009). Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Change. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 701–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D., Foli, R., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Woo, J. J. (04 June, 2018). Instrument Constituencies and Transnational Policy Diffusion: The Case of Conditional Cash Transfers. Review of International Political Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beramendi, P., & Anderson, C. (2012). Left Parties, Poor Voters, and Electoral Participation in Advanced Industrial Societies. Comparative Political Studies, 45(6), 714–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G. (2005). The Politics of the New Social Policies: Providing Coverage Against New Social Risks in Mature Welfare State. Policy & Politics, 33(3), 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G. (2012). Blame Avoidance and Credit Claiming Revisited. In G. Bonoli & D. Natali (Eds.), The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G., & Natali, D. (Eds.). (2012). The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G., & Trein, P. (2016). Cost-shifting in Multitiered Welfare states: Responding to Rising Welfare Caseloads in Germany and Switzerland. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 46(4), 568–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G., Natili, M., & Trein, P. (2018). A Federalist’s Dilemma: Tradeoffs Between Social Legitimacy and Budget Responsibility in Multitiered Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornschier, S. (2010). Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornshier, S., & Kriesi, H. (2013). The Populist Right, the Working Class, and the Changing Face of Class Politics In J. Rydgren (Ed.), Class Politics and the Radical Right. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugiavini. (2001). What do Unions do the Welfare States. In T. Boeri, A. Brugiavini & L. Calmfors (Eds.), The Role of Unions in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, B., & Vandenbroucke, F. (Eds.). (2013). Reconciling Work and Poverty Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G., & Uhr, J. (2005). Australia—Federal Constraints and Institutional Innovations. In H. Obinger, S. Leibfried, & F. Castles (Eds.), Federalism and the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H., & Mattoni, A. (2010). The Contentious Field of Precarious Work in Italy: Political Actors, Strategies and Coalitions. Working USA: The Journal of Labor and Society, 13, 213–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, D. (2012). Solidarity or Dualization? Social Governance, Union Preferences and Unemployment Benefit Adjustment in Belgium and France. In P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier, & M. Seeleib-Kaiser (Eds.), The Age of Dualization. The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, D. (2013). Dynamics and Varieties of Active Inclusion: A Five Country Comparison. Deliverable D5.6, Project Combating Poverty in Europe: Reorganising Active Inclusion through Participatory and Integrated Modes of Multilevel Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, D. (2014). Themed Section: Reforming Minimum Income Protection in Europe. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 30(2): 127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, D., Graziano, P., & van Wijnbergen, C. (2010). Between Sectionalism and Revitalisation: Trade Unions and Activation Policies in Europe (RECWOWE Working Papers REC-WP 07/2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, D., & Palier, B. (2014). Implementing a Myth: The Evolution of Conditionality in French Minimum Income Provision. In I. Lødemel & A. Moreira (Eds.), Activation or Workfare? Governance and The Neo—Liberal Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1972). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. B., & Emmenegger, P. (2013). Defending the Organisation, Not the Members: Unions and the Reform of Job Security Legislation in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3), 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durazzi, N. (2017). Inclusive Unions in a Dualized Labour Market? The Challenge of Organizing Labour Market Policy and Social Protection for Labour Market Outsiders. Social Policy & Administration, 51(2), 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eardley, T., Bradshaw, J., Ditch, J., Gough, I., & Whiteford. (1996). Social Assistance in OECD Countries. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1957). An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems. World Politics, 9, 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, B. (2006). Trade Union Movements in Post-Industrial Welfare States. Opening Up to New Social Interests. In K. Armingeon & G. Bonoli (Eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Welfare States to New Social Risks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (Eds.). (2012). The Age of Dualization. The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1985). Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1992). The Emerging Realignment Between Labour Movements and Welfare States. In M. Regini (Ed.), The Future of Labour Movements. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fargion, V. (2000). Timing and the Development of Social Care Services in Europe. West European Politics, 23(2), 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (1993). Modelli di solidarietà. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (1996). The “Southern Model” of Welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 1, 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (2005a). The Boundaries of Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (Ed.). (2005b). Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe: Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (2008). The European Welfare State: Golden Achievements, Silver Prospects. West European Politics, 31(2), 82–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M., Fargion, V., & Jessoula, M. (2012). Alle radici del welfare all’italiana. Venezia: Marsilio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fix, B., & Fix, E. (2002). From Charity to Client-Oriented Social Service Production: A Social Profile of Religious Welfare Associations in Western European Comparison. European Journal of Social Work, 5(1), 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleckenstein, T. (2011). Institutions, Ideas and Learning in Welfare State Change: Labour Market Reforms in Germany. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flora, P., & Heidenheimer, A. J. (1981). The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. London and New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, P. (Ed.). (1986). Growth to Limits: The Western European Welfare States Since World War II. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzoni, J. M., & Voorend, K. (2011). Actors and Ideas Behind CCTs in Chile, Costa Rica and El Salvador. Global Social Policy, 11(2–3), 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garay, C. (2016). Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garay, C. (2017). Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giger, N., & Nelson, M. (2011). The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment: Blame Avoidance or Credit Claiming in the Era of Permanent Austerity? European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilardi, F. (2010). Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, J., & Häusermann, S. (2015). The Decline of the Working-Class Vote, the Reconfiguration of the Welfare Support Coalition and Consequences for the Welfare State. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(1), 50–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, P. (2004). Europeizzazione e politiche pubbliche italiane. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, P. (2011). Europeanization and Domestic Employment Policy Change: Conceptual and Methodological Background. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 24(3), 583–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzymala-Busse, A. (2012). Why Comparative Politics Should Take Religion (More) Seriously. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 421–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. (2015). More of the Same: The World Bank’s Social Policy Response to Global Economic Crisis. Global Social Policy, 15(1), 88–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State. The Case of Economic Policy in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, S. (2010). The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, S. (2012). The Politics of Old and New Social Policies. In G. Bonoli & D. Natali (Eds.), The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, S., & Walter, S. (2010). Restructuring Swiss Welfare Politics: Post-Industrial Labor Markets, Globalization and Attitudes Towards Social Policies. In S. Hug & H. Kriesi (Eds.), Value Change in Switzerland. Lexington: Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, S., Picot, G., & Geering, D. (2013). Partisan Politics and the Welfare State. Recent Advances in the Literature. British Journal of Political Science, 43(1), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist Institutionalism. In S. Rhodes, S. Binder, & B. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R. (2001). Who Speaks for the Poor? New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure. Agency and Historical Institutionalism in Political Studies, 46(5), 951–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A. (2012). Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijk, A. (Ed.). (2017). The Uses of Social Investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hien, J. (2014). The Return of Religion? The Paradox of Faith-Based Welfare Provision in a Secular Age (MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C. (2014). The Right and the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J. (2010). Diffusing Ideas for After Neoliberalism: The Social Investment Perspective in Europe and Latin America. Global Social Policy, 10(1), 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessoula, M. (2009). La politica pensionistica. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessoula, M. (2010). Recalibrating the Italian Welfare State: A Politics Too Weak for a “Necessary” Policy? Italian Politics, 25, 204–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessoula, M., & Natili, M. (2016). Children Against Fathers? The Politics of Intergenerational Recalibration in Southern Europe. Paper Presented at the 23rd International Conference of Europeanist, Philadelphia, April 14–16, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessoula, M., & Madama, I. (Eds.). (2018). Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in the EU. A Chance in Europe 2020. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessoula, M., Kubisa, J., Madama, I., & Zielenska, M. (2014). Understanding Convergence and Divergence: Old and New Cleavages in the Politics of Minimum Income Schemes in Italy and Poland. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 30(2), 128–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, S. (2009). Religious Social Doctrines and Poor Relief: A Different Causal Pathway. In P. Manow & K. Van Kersbergen (Eds.), Religion, Class Coalitions and Welfare States (pp. 267–295). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kazepov, Y., & Barberis, E. (2012). Social Assistance Governance in Europe: Towards a Multilevel Perspective. In I. Marx & K. Nelson (Eds.), Minimum Income Protection in Flux. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. (2001). Partisan Competition and Welfare State Retrenchment: When Do Politicians Choose Unpopular Policies? In P. Pierson (Ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W. (1983). The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W. (2006). Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists. Consenters, and Antagonists World Politics, 58(2), 167–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998). The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries. American Sociological Review, 63(5), 661–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (2003). New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95. The American Political Science Review, 97(3), 425–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalioti, V. (2016). The Curious Case of the Guaranteed Minimum Income (GMI): Highlighting Greek ‘Exceptionalism’ in a Southern European Context. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(1), 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, A. C. (2013). The Rise and Fall of Social Cohesion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, A. C., & Dejgaard, E. T. (2013). The Institutional Logic of Images of the Poor and Welfare Recipients: A Comparative Study of British, Swedish and Danish Newspapers. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(3), 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. K., & Kofman, Y. (2014). The Politics of Precarity: Views Beyond the United States. Work and Occupations, 39(4), 388–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindvall, J., & Rueda, D. (2014). The Insider–Outsider Dilemma. British Journal of. Political Science, 44, 460–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madama, I. (2010). Le politiche di assistenza sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madama, I., & Jessoula, M. (2015). ‘Alleanza contro la povertà e reddito minimo: Perché può essere la volta buona’, VV. AA. Dopo la crisi, costruiamo il welfare, Rapporto 2015, pp. 91–105. Caritas Italiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madama, I., & Natili, M. (2016). A Farewell to Universalism, a Farewell to Equality? The Paradox of Redistribution in the Era of the New Politics of the Welfare State. Politiche Sociali/Social Policies, 3(3), 459–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madama, I., Jessoula, M., & Natili, M. (2014). Minimum Income: The Italian Trajectory (LPF Working Paper 1/2014). Centro Einaudi, Torino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2000). Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2005). Introduction in Sartori, G. Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manow, P. (2009). Electoral Rules, Class Coalitions and Welfare State Regimes, or How to Explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan. Socio-Economic Review, 7, 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manow, P., & Van Kersbergen, K. (Eds.). (2009). Religion, Class Coalitions and Welfare States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchal, S., & Van Mechelen, N. (2017). A New Kid in Town? Active Inclusion Elements in European Minimum Income Schemes. Social Policy & Administration, 51, 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, I. (2007). A New Social Question? On Minimum Income Protection in the Post-Industrial Era. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, I., & Nelson, K. (Eds.). (2012). Minimum Income Protection in Flux. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, P., & Picot, G. (2013). The Party Preferences of Atypical Workers in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(2), 164–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsaganis, M., Ferrera, M., Capucha, L., & Moreno, L. (2003). Mending Nets in the South: Anti-Poverty Policies in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Social Policy and Administration, 37(6), 639–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R., & Hyman, R. (2013). Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moene, K., & Wallerstein, M. (2001). Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 859–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina (2006). Trade Union Strategies and Change in Neo-Corporatist Concertation: A New Century of Political Exchange? West European Politics, 29(4), 640–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina, O., & Rhodes, M. (2002). Corporatism: The Past, Present and Future of a Concept. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 305–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, A. (2008). The Activation Dilemma. Reconciling the Fairness and Effectiveness of Minimum Income Schemes in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, L., & Palier, B. (2005). The Europeanisation of Welfare: Paradigm Shifts and Social Policy Reforms. In P. Taylor-Gooby (Ed.), Ideas and Welfare State Reforms in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mouchard, D. (2002). Les mobilisations des «sans» dans la France contemporaine l’émergence d’un “radicalisme autolimité. Revue française de science politique, 4, 425–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myles, J. E., & Quadagno, J. (2002). Political Theories of the Welfare State. Social Service Review, 76(1), 34–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natili, M. (2016). Schemi di reddito minimo tra dinamiche di politics e sviluppi di policy. I casi di Friuli Venezia Giulia e Lazio. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 1, 87–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natili, M. (2017). Explaining Different Trajectories of Minimum Income Schemes: Groups, Parties and Political Exchange in Italy and Spain. Journal of European Social Policy, First Published September 13, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natili, M., Jessoula, M., Matsaganis, M., & Madama, I. (2018). The Right(s) and Minimum Income in Hard Times: Southern and Eastern Europe Compared. European Societies, Published Online 11 July 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2008). Precarity as a Political Concept, or, Fordism as Exception. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (2007). Universalism Versus Targeting: The Vulnerability of Social Insurance and Means-Tested Minimum Income Protection in 18 Countries, 1990–2002. International Social Security Review, 60(1), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obinger, H., Leibfried, S., & Castles, F. G. (Eds). 2005. Federalism and the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palier, B. (Ed.). (2010). A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, G. (2012). Politics of Segmentation: Party Competition and Social Protection in Europe. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Tatcher, and The Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (Ed.). (2001). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2016). Review Symposium. Socio-Economic Review, 14(2), 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P., & Weaver, K. (1993). Imposing Losses in Pension Policy. In K., Weaver & B. Rockman (Eds.), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzorno, A. (1977). Scambio politico e identità collettiva nel conflitto di classe. In C. Crouch & A. Pizzorno (Eds.), Conflitti in Europa. Milano: Etas libri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. (2000). Policy Transfer in the European Union: Institutional Isomorphism as a Source of Legitimacy. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 13(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regini, M. (1984). The Conditions for Political Exchange: How Concertation Emerged and Collapsed in Italy and Great Britain. In J. Goldthorpe (Ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regini, M. (1999). Between De-Regulation and Social Pacts. The Responses of European Economies to Globalisation. Politics and Society, 28(1), 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (2001). The Political Economy of Social Pacts:‘Competitive Corporatism’ and European Welfare Reform. In Pierson, P. (Ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, J. (2003). Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government. International Organization, 57(4), 695–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (1995). La Nouvelle Question Sociale: Repenser l’Etat Providence. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, D. (2007). Social Democracy Inside Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, C. (2006). Social Assistance Policies and Decentralization in The Countries of Southern Europe. Revue française des affaires sociales, 5(5), 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, C. (2015). Il lavoro non basta. Milano: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1982). Teoria dei partiti e caso italiano. Milano: SugarCo Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1990). The Sociology of Parties: A Critical Review. In P. Mair (Ed.), The West European Party System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. (1948). Pressure Groups Versus Political Parties. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 259, 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwander, H. (2018). Are Social Democratic Parties Insider Parties? Electoral Strategies of Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe in the Age of Dualization. Comparative Political Studies, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoppino, M. (2001). Potere e teoria politica. Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streek, W., & Hasell, A. (2004). Trade Unions as Political Actors In J. T. Addison & C. Schnabel (Eds.), International Handbook of Trade Unions. Cheltenam: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, N. B. (2011). The Diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in the Americas. Global Social Policy, 11(2–3), 250–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. (Ed.). (2004). New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. (Ed.). (2005). Ideas and Welfare State Reforms in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, M., & Walker, R. (2012). Labor Market Disadvantage and the Experience of Recurrent Poverty. In P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier & M. Seeleib-Kaiser (Eds.), The Age of Dualization. The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kersbergen, K. (1995). Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlandas, T. (2013). The Politics of In-Work Benefits: The Case of the ‘Active Income of Solidarity’ in France. French Politics, 11(2), 117–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, C. (2000). Confessions of an Interest Group. The Catholic Church and Political Parties in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, K. (1986). The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, K. (2009). Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, H. (1975). The Welfare State and Equality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Natili .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Natili, M. (2019). Groups, Parties and Credit-Claiming Dynamics: The Politics of Minimum Income in the Age of Austerity. In: The Politics of Minimum Income . Work and Welfare in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96211-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96211-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96210-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96211-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics