Abstract
This chapter discusses media use and its repercussions for international students’ relationships and support networks and whether a changing media landscape is leading to social transformation. This chapter focuses on social processes in the context of technological mediation in support exchanges. Face-to-face contact is considered to be only one of many media channels for social support exchange. International students have different support structures and prefer different media when communicating with each. Although the categories of media are broadly classified, the frequency and type of channel add more substance to the networks. The chapter concludes with the introduction of three profiles of media use: classic media, neoteric media, and established media.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Source: Internet Live Stats (www.InternetLiveStats.com) April 1, 2018 Estimate. According to the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), an internet user is an individual (regardless of age) who can access the internet at home via any device type and connection.
- 2.
Maslow’s (1943) hierarchy of needs is a psychological theory illustrating the phases of growth such as physiological needs, safety, belongingness and love, esteem, self-actualisation, and self-transcendence in human beings.
- 3.
Principal components analysis was employed because the main objective was to recognise and compute composite scores for the factors underlying the media dimensions.
- 4.
Face-to-face contact , letters , text/SMS, phone calls, email , IM , social networking sites, and other platforms on a frequency scale, ranging from 0Â =Â Never, 1Â =Â Less than five times a year, 2Â =Â Five times a year, 3Â =Â Several times a month, 4Â =Â Once a month, 5Â =Â Several times a month, 6Â =Â Once a week, 7Â =Â Several times a week, 8Â =Â Daily.
References
Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication Research, 3(1), 3–21.
Baym, N. K. (1998). The emergence of on-line community. cybersociety, 2(0), 35–68.
Bessiere, K., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., & Boneva, B. S. (2008). Effects of Internet use and social resources on changes in depression. Information, Community & Society, 11(1), 47–70.
Boase, J. (2008). Personal networks and the personal communication system: Using multiple media to connect. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 490–508.
Castells, M. (2000). Toward a sociology of the network society. Contemporary Sociology, 29(5), 693–699.
Chen, W. (2010). Internet-usage patterns of immigrants in the process of intercultural adaptation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(4), 387–399.
Costa, R. D. (2006). On a new concept of community: Social networks, personal communities and collective intelligence. Interface-Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 2(SE), 0–0.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 153–181.
Fong, E., Wellman, B., Kew, M., & Wilkes, R. (2001). Correlates of the digital divide: Individual, household and spatial variation. Ottawa, Canada: Office of Learning Technologies, Human Resources Development.
Giddens, A. (1990). Structuration theory and sociological analysis. In J. Clark, C. Mogdil, & F. Mogdil (Eds.), Anthony Giddens: Consensus and controversy (pp. 297–315). Brighton: Falmer.
Gruzd, A., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Enabling community through social media. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(10).
Haythornthwaite, C. (2000). Online personal networks: Size, composition and media use among distance learners. New Media & Society, 2(2), 195–226.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society, 8(2), 125–147.
Hiller, H. H., & Franz, T. M. (2004). New ties, old ties and lost ties: The use of the internet in diaspora. New Media & Society, 6(6), 731–752.
Hogan, B. (2003). Media multiplexity: An examination of differential communication usage. Annual meeting of the Association of Internet Researchers, Toronto, Canada.
Hogan, B. J. (2009). Networking in everyday life. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto.
Jamieson, L. (2013). Personal relationships, intimacy and the self in a mediated and global digital age. In K. Orton-Johnson & N. Prior (Eds.), Digital sociology (pp. 13–33). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
Katz, E. (1959). Mass communications research and the study of popular culture: An editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Departmental Papers (ASC), 165.
Koku, E., Nazer, N., & Wellman, B. (2001). Netting scholars: Online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1752–1774.
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. Routledge.
Markus, M. L. (1994). Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12(2), 119–149.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the message. New York, 123, 126–128.
Michelson, W. (2005). Time use: Expanding explanation in the social sciences. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Mok, D., & Wellman, B. (2007). Did distance matter before the Internet?: Interpersonal contact and support in the 1970s. Social Networks, 29(3), 430–461.
Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2001). Emergence of communication networks. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 440–502). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361.
Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., Witte, J. C., & Hampton, K. N. (2002). Capitalizing on the net: Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 291–324). Oxford: Blackwell.
Rainie, L. (2006). Digital natives invade the workplace. In Pew Internet & American life project: Washington, DC (pp. 290–315).
Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.
Reid, E. M. (1994). Cultural formations in text-based virtual realities. University of Melbourne.
Rheingold, H. (1985). Tools for thought: The history and future of mind-expanding technology. MIT Press.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT Press.
Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.
Tu, C. H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(2), 34–45.
Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from ourselves. New York: Basic Books.
Veenhof, B., Wellman, B., Quell, C., & Hogan, B. (2008). How Canadians’ use of the Internet affects social life and civic participation. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Wellman, B. (2001). Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. In Kyoto Workshop on Digital Cities (pp. 10–25). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.). (2008). The Internet in everyday life. John Wiley & Sons.
Wellman, B., Hogan, B., Berg, K., Boase, J., Carrasco, J.-A., Côté, R., Kayahara, J., Kennedy, T. L., & Tran, P. (2006). Connected lives: The project. In P. Purcell (Ed.), Networked neighbourhoods (pp. 161–216). Springer.
Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., & Chen, W. (2002). Examining the Internet in everyday life. In Keynote address to the Euricom Conference on e-Democracy, Nijmegen, Netherlands (October).
Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558–588.
Zerubavel, E. (1982). The standardization of time: A sociohistorical perspective. American Journal of Sociology, 88(1), 1–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kanagavel, R. (2019). New Agency of Personal Communities. In: The Social Lives of Networked Students. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96199-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96199-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96198-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96199-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)