Skip to main content

Introducing Preservice Science Teachers in the Development of Inquiry-Based Activities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Role of Laboratory Work in Improving Physics Teaching and Learning

Abstract

The aim of this paper is on how to prepare undergraduate science students to be able to develop inquiry-based activities. A course was designed where the development of inquiry based activities following the Hegarty-Hazel inquiry continuum model was used to design inquiry based experiments. A virtual (simulated) lab was opted as the appropriate “vehicle” since it provides unlimited access to laboratory settings, even from home where students rethink and refine their design. The course follows the design, development, practice, reflection and discussion of experimental activities. Different kinds of results are discussed to find out how the undergraduate science students evaluate the “vehicle” they have and how they perceive the inquiry continuum model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., Tuan, H.-I.: Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88 (3), 397–419 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Anagnos, T., Komives, C., Mourtos, N.J., and McMullin K.M.: Evaluating student mastery of design of experiment. Paper presented at the 37th ASEE/IEEE, ‘Frontiers in Education’, Milwaukee, WI, 10–13 October 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binns I.C. Popp S.: Learning to teach science through inquiry: Experiences of preservice teachers. Electronic Journal of Science Education. 17(1), 1 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V., Annetta, L. A., Granger, E. M.: Is inquiry possible in light of accountability? A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94 (4), 577–616 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20390

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong T.: Technological Advances in Inquiry Learning. Science, 312, 532-533 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong T., Linn M., Zacharias Z.: Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education. Science, 340, 305-308 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Eick, C., Meadows, L., Balkcom, R.: Breaking into inquiry: Scaffolding supports beginning efforts to implement inquiry in the classroom. The Science Teacher,72(7),49–53 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster D., Barendziak T., Haskamp F., Kastenholz L.: Raising standards through INQUIRE in pre-service teacher education. Science Education International, 25 (1), 29-39 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • EU.: Science Education NOW: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe (2007). http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2016

  • Field, A. P.: Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE, London, England (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grudin J. Utility and usability: research issues and development contexts. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 4(2), 209-217 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(92)90005-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M. W.: Working Scientifically: Implementing and assessing open investigation work in Science, p. 2. Education Department of W.A., Western Australia (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzikraniotis E., Bisdikian G., Barbas A., Psillos D., (2007). OptiLAb: Design and Development of an Integrated Virtual Laboratory for Teaching Optics. Proceedings of CBLIS-07, 30 June - 6 July 2007, Crete (Greece) pp. 523-530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty-Hazel E.: Lab work SET: research information for teachers, No.1. The Australian Council for Educational Research, Canberra (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkos, I., Psillos, D., Hatzikraniotis, D.: Designing experiments on thermal interactions by secondary students in a simulated laboratory environment. Research in Science and Technology Education, 29 (2), 189–204 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2010.533266

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen A., Nieminen P. Viiri J.: Preservice teachers’ TPACK beliefs and attitude toward simulations. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 151-171 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, E. L., Linn, M. C.: Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 657-677 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310607

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld P. C., Krajcik J. S., Fishman B., Soloway E., Geier R., Tali R. T.: Inquiry-Based Science in the Middle Grades: Assessment of Learning in Urban Systemic Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1063-1080 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20039

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Molohidis A., Michaloudis A., Hatzikraniotis E.: Engagement in Inquiry based activities through web labs. Proceedings of ICERI2016 Conference, Seville, Spain, 14th–16th Nov 2016, pp. 6904-6913

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC): Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olympiou G., Zacharia Z., de Jong T.: Making the invisible visible: enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation. Instructional Science, 41(3), 575-596 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9245-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedaste M., Mäeots M., Siiman L.A., de Jong T., van Riesen S.A.N., Kamp E.T., Manoli C.C., Zacharias Z.C., Tsourlidaki E.: Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle, Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taramopoulos A. Psillos D.: Complex phenomena understanding in electricity through dynamically linked concrete and abstract representations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,33(2), 151-163 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White B.Y., Shimoda T.A., Frederiksen J.R.: Enabling Students to Construct Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for Metacognitive Development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 151-182 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasios Molohidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Molohidis, A., Hatzikraniotis, E. (2018). Introducing Preservice Science Teachers in the Development of Inquiry-Based Activities. In: Sokołowska, D., Michelini, M. (eds) The Role of Laboratory Work in Improving Physics Teaching and Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96184-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics