Abstract
Methods to estimate step length using accelerometers are gaining attention in recent times. However, the influence of the sensor location on the accuracy of step length estimation is still unknown for models fabricated in a uniform manner. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of step length estimations among the following three body parts: ankle, pelvis, and wrist. Ten time-normalized acceleration signals from one gait cycle were obtained from 247 healthy adults aged 20 to 77 while walking barefoot at a comfortable, self-selected speed. Linear multiple regression analyses with leave-one-participant-out cross validation technique were used to build the algorithms. The absolute value of mean error for each participant (AME) was computed to compare the accuracies among the body parts. Mean (standard deviation) values of AME for each part were as follows: ankle, 2.66 (2.24) cm; pelvis, 3.09 (2.39) cm; and wrist, 4.05 (3.01) cm. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences for the ankle–wrist and pelvis–wrist estimations. We found that step length can be estimated from the acceleration signal of the ankle or pelvis with almost the same accuracy (approximately 3 cm of average error between participants). Also, estimation of step lengths with the acceleration signals obtained from the wrist needs to be conducted more carefully than those obtained from the ankle or pelvis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kim H, Suzuki T, Yoshida H, Shimada H, Yamashiro Y, Sudo M, Niki Y (2013) Are gait parameters related to knee pain, urinary incontinence and a history of falls in community-dwelling elderly women? Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi 50(4):528–535
Taniguchi Y, Yoshida H, Fujiwara Y, Motohashi Y, Shinkai S (2012) A prospective study of gait performance and subsequent cognitive decline in a general population of older Japanese. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67(7):796–803
Dang HV, Živanović S (2015) Experimental characterisation of walking locomotion on rigid level surfaces using motion capture system. Eng Struct 91:141–154
Demura T, Demura S (2010) Relationship among gait parameters while walking with varying loads. J Physiol Anthropol 29(1):29–34
Köse A, Cereatti A, Della Croce U (2012) Bilateral step length estimation using a single inertial measurement unit attached to the pelvis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 9:9
Shin SH, Park CG (2011) Adaptive step length estimation algorithm using optimal parameters and movement status awareness. Med Eng Phys 33(9):1064–1071
Renaudin V, Susi M, Lachapelle G (2012) Step length estimation using handheld inertial sensors. Sensors (Basel) 12(7):8507–8525
Pepa L, Verdini F, Spalazzi L (2017) Gait parameter and event estimation using smartphones. Gait Posture 57:217–223
Peruzzi A, Della Croce U, Cereatti A (2011) Estimation of stride length in level walking using an inertial measurement unit attached to the foot: a validation of the zero velocity assumption during stance. J Biomech 44(10):1991–1994
Zihajehzadeh S, Park EJ (2016) Regression model-based walking speed estimation using wrist-worn inertial sensor. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0165211
Kobayashi Y, Hobara H, Mochimaru M (2015) AIST Gait Database. https://www.dh.aist.go.jp/database/gait2015/index.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2018
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Collins JJ, Whittle MW (1989) Impulsive forces during walking and their clinical implications. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 4(3):179–187
Orendurff MS, Segal AD, Klute GK, Berge JS, Rohr ES, Kadel NJ (2004) The effect of walking speed on center of mass displacement. J Rehabil Res Dev 41(6A):829–834
Lord SR, Lloyd DG, Li SK (1996) Sensori-motor function, gait patterns and falls in community-dwelling women. Age Ageing 25(4):292–299
Elble RJ, Thomas SS, Higgins C, Colliver J (1991) Stride-dependent changes in gait of older people. J Neurol 238(1):1–5
Oberg T, Karsznia A, Oberg K (1993) Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10–79 years of age. J Rehabil Res Dev 30(2):210–223
Kobayashi Y, Hobara H, Heldoorn TA, Kouchi M, Mochimaru M (2016) Age-independent and age-dependent sex differences in gait pattern determined by principal component analysis. Gait Posture 46:11–17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ueda, T. et al. (2019). Estimation Accuracy of Step Length by Acceleration Signals: Comparison Among Three Different Sensor Locations. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96098-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96098-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96097-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96098-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)