Skip to main content

The Influence of the Metabolism in the PMV Model from ISO 7730 (2005)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 819))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1754 Accesses

Abstract

Thermal comfort is one of the most influential variable to the measurable environmental quality. The most used mechanism to measure thermal comfort in a moderate environment is the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) of the ISO 7730 standard [1]. Studies show discrepancies between the PMV and the occupants’ thermal sensation vote (TSV). The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of the metabolism on the PMV model that represents the real sensation of students while working on a smart environment. Personal and lifestyle data was collected through questionnaires. The metabolism was calculated through six different methods. A comparison found that the study of Gilani et al. [2] was more accurate considering the TSV. Statistical tests were used to analyze the difference and compare the groups of quantitative, binary and nominal variables with significance level of 0,05. Using Generalized Linear Models (GLM) and the metabolism model of Gilani et al. [2] two models were adjusted. It was shown that gender and drug (medicaments) usage have an influence of approximate 10% over the metabolism. The new models were used to calculate PMVx and PMVy. Both PMVx and PMVy were found to be closer to the TSV than the PMV calculated with the metabolism obtained through the activity (1,2 met), though limited by the results from Gilani et al. [2]. These results show that the evolution of the environments such as the new smart teaching environments drive the need for improvement in thermal comfort studies using personal variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ISO 7730 (2005) Ergonomics of the thermal environment – analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. International Standard Organization, Genève

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gilani SI, Khan MH, Ali M (2016) Revisiting Fanger’s thermal comfort model using mean blood pressure as a bio-marker: an experimental investigation. Appl. Thermal Eng. 109:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daghigh R (2015) Assessing the thermal comfort and ventilation in Malaysia and the surrounding regions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 48:681–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zaki SA, Damiati SA, Rijal HB, Hagishima A, Razak AA (2017) Adaptive thermal comfort in university classrooms in Malaysia and Japan. Build Environ 122:294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Dear R, Akimoto T, Arens E, Candido C, Cheong K, Li B, Nishihara N, Sekhar SC, Tanabe S, Toftum J (2013) Progress in thermal comfort research over the last twenty years. Indoor Air 23:442–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reigner C (2012) Guide to setting thermal comfort criteria and minimizing energy use in delivering thermal comfort. Energy Effi Renew Energy 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  7. Attia S, Hensen JLM (2014) Investigating the impact of different thermal comfort models for zero energy buildings in hot climates. In: Proceedings 1st international conference on energy and indoor environment for hot climates, ASHRAE, Doha, Qatar, 24–26 February 2014

    Google Scholar 

  8. Auliciems A, Szokolay SV (2007) Thermal Comfort, 2nd and 4th edns. PLEA Notes, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andreasi WA, Lamberts R, Cândido C (2010) Thermal acceptability assessment in buildings located in hot and humid regions in Brazil. Build Environ 45:1225–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dhaka S, Mathur J, Brager G, Honnekeri A (2015) Assessment of thermal environmental conditions and quantification of thermal adaptation in naturally ventilated buildings in composite climate of India. Build Environ 86:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ricciardi P, Buratti C (2012) Thermal comfort in open plan offices in northern Italy: an adaptive approach. Build Environ 56:314–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ricciardi P, Buratti C (2015) Thermal comfort in the Fraschini theatre (Pavia, Italy): correlation between data from questionnaires, measurements, and mathematical model. Energy Build 99:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Humphreys MA, Nicol JF (2002) The validity of ISO-PMV for predicting comfort votes in every-day thermal environments. Energy Build 34:667–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim J, Lim J, Cho S, Young G (2015) Development of the adaptive PMV model for improving prediction performances. Energy Build 98:100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ISO 8996 (2004) Ergonomics of the thermal environment – determination of metabolic rate. International Standard Organization, Genève

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luo M, Zhouc X, Zhua Y, Sundell J (2016) Revisiting an overlooked parameter in thermal comfort studies, the metabolic rate. Energy Build 118:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moreira C, Monteiro PRR, Góis J, Miguel AR (2012) Comparative analysis of methods for determining the metabolic rate in order to provide a balance between man and the environment. In: Segurança e Higiene Ocupacionais – SHO. – Livro de Resumos, Sociedade Portuguesa de Segurança e Higiene Ocupacionais (SPOSHO), pp 297–299

    Google Scholar 

  18. Choi JH, Loftness V, Aziz A (2012) Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines. Energy Build 46:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruas AC (1999) Avaliação de conforto térmico: contribuição a aplicação pratica das normas interacionais. Campinas. 90f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Civil) – Programa de Pós Graduação em Engenharia Civil, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

    Google Scholar 

  20. ASHRAE (2003) ASHRAE Standard 55 – Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Methods. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  21. ISO 7726 (2002) Ergonomics of the thermal environment – instruments for measuring physical quantities. International Standard Organization, Genève

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nácul FE, O’Donnell JM (2010) Hemodynamic monitoring. In: O’Donnell JM, Nácul FE (eds) Surgical Intensive Care Medicine. Springer, Boston, pp 67–74

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garcia R, Ortiz K, Mármol G, Del Cioppo J, Lucio N (2016) Technologies and Innovation. CITI, Guayaquil

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. de Souza AGL (2017) Avaliação da pressão arterial e da frequência cardíaca de alunos na realização de atividades cognitivas em ambientes climatizados. João Pessoa, Paraíba

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alinny Dantas Avelino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Avelino, A.D., da Silva, L.B., Souza, E.L. (2019). The Influence of the Metabolism in the PMV Model from ISO 7730 (2005). In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics