Autopsy as on Outcome and Performance Measure: Three Years of Hospital Autopsy as an Instrument of Clinical Audit

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 819)


An extensive literature documents a high prevalence of errors in clinical diagnosis discovered at autopsy. Multiple studies have suggested no significant decrease in these errors over time. Despite these findings, autopsies have dramatically decreased in frequency in the United States and many other countries. In 1994, the last year for which national U.S. data exist, the autopsy rate for all non-forensic deaths fell below 6%. The marked decline in autopsy rates from previous rates of 40–50% undoubtedly reflects various factors, including reimbursement issues, the attitudes of clinicians regarding the utility of autopsies in the setting of other diagnostic advances, and general unfamiliarity with the autopsy and techniques for requesting it, especially among physicians-in-training. The autopsy is valuable for its role in undergraduate and graduate medical education, the identification and characterization of new diseases, and contributions to the understanding of disease pathogenesis. Although extensive, these benefits are difficult to quantify. This review of the last three years of hospital autopsy in Lucca studied the more easily quantifiable benefits of the autopsy as a tool in performance measurement and improvement. Such benefits largely relate to the role of the autopsy in detecting errors in clinical diagnosis and unsuspected complications of treatment. It is hoped that characterizing the extent to which the autopsy provides data relevant to clinical performance measurement and improvement will help inform strategies for preserving the benefits of routinely obtained autopsies and for considering its wider use as an instrument for quality improvement.


Hospital autopsy Performance measure Clinical audit 


  1. 1.
    Burton JL, Underwood JC (2003) Necropsy practice after the ‘‘organ retention scandal’’: requests, performance, and tissue retention. J Clin Pathol 56:537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Autopsy Working Party (2004) The decline of the hospital autopsy: a safety and quality issue for healthcare in Australia. Med J Aust 180:281–285Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chariot P, Witt K, Pautot V et al (2004) Declining autopsy rate in a French hospital: physicians’ attitudes to the autopsy and use of autopsy material in research publications. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:739–745Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nichols L, Aronica P, Babe C (1998) Are autopsies obsolete? Am J Clin Pathol 110:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L (2005) Overestimation of clinical diagnostic performance caused by low necropsy rates. Qual Saf Health Care 14:408–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Swaro A, Adhiyaman V (2010) Autopsy in older medical patients: concordance in ante- and post-mortem findings and changing trens. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 40:205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saad R, Yamada AT, Pereira de Rosa FH et al (2007) Coronary artery disease. Comparison between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in a cardiology hospital. Heart 93:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gibson TN, Shirley SE, Escoffery CT et al (2004) Discrepancies between clinical and post mortem diagnoses in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies. J Clin Pathol 57:980–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spiliopoulou C, Papadodima S, Kotakidis N et al (2005) Clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings. A retrospective analysis of 252 cases in Greece. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:210–214Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sington JD, Cottrell BJ (2002) Analysis of the sensitivity of death certificates in 440 hospital deaths: a comparison with necropsy findings. J Clin Pathol 55:499–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perkins GD, McAuley DF, Davies S et al (2003) Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study. Crit Care 7:129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Legal MedicineAzienda USL Toscana Nordovest LuccaLuccaItaly

Personalised recommendations