Skip to main content

A Safety-II Approach on Operational Maneuvers of a Hydropower Plant

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1697 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 819))

Abstract

This work investigates, under the Resilience Engineering (RE) approach, the environmental conditions that lead to accidents at the Itaipu Binacional hydroelectric power plant (Itaipu HPP). The socio-technical importance of the installation and the technological update of all control, supervision and monitoring systems in a near future justify the work. The study focused on the impacts of variability in the normal operation of four typical maneuvers representing the four quadrants of a periodicity-complexity matrix, and the variability influencing each step of the maneuvers. The opinions from the operational staff were raised, organized, and the RE principles, techniques and heuristics were applied to them. Although the selected maneuvers might not represent the whole universe of more than five hundred maneuvers executed by the Itaipu HPP, the results indicate that some variability types such as “maneuver environment”, “the need to confirm the maneuver steps with another operator”, “situations that draw attention from the operator”, and “the similarity with another operating environment” act decisively in practically all maneuvers. The operator knowledge was not mapped as a fundamental variability impacting the failures. The results were compared with historical data and presented to the staff, who proposed necessary actions to increase the operational safety under the RE perspective. Overall results imply that there is room for moving from a reactive traditional safety management (Safety-I), based on retrospective analysis of accidents and “what went wrong,” to an effective proactive one (Safety-II), based on the variability of normal operation and therefore “what goes right.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kemeny J, Babbitt B, Haggerty P, Lewis C, Marks P, McBride L, McPherson H, Peterson R, Pigford T, Taylor T, Trunk A (1979) Report of the President’s Commission on the accident at Three Mile Island: the need for change, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. IAEA (1992) Report INSAG-7 Chernobyl accident: updating of INSAG-1, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belash IG (2010) Hydrotechnical construction: causes of the failure of the no. 2 hydraulic generating set at the Sayano-Shushenskaya HPP: criticality of reliability enhancement for water-power equipment. Power Technol Eng 44(3):165–170

    Google Scholar 

  4. BP (2010) Deepwater horizon accident investigation report, London. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/sustainability/issue-reports/Deepwater_Horizon_Accident_Investigation_Report.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2018

  5. IAEA (2011) IAEA International fact finding expert mission of the nuclear accident following the great east Japan earthquake and IAEA expert mission to Japan, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hollnagel E (2014) Safety-I and Safety-II, the Past and Future of Safety Management. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hollnagel E, Wears RL, Braithwaite J (2015) From Safety-I to Safety-II: a white paper. The Resilient Health Care Net: Published simultaneously by the University of Southern Denmark, University of Florida, USA, and Macquarie University, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hollnagel E, Woods D, Leveson N (eds) (2006) Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Ashgate Publishing Co., Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lundberg J, Johansson BJE (2015) Systemic resilience model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 141(special issue on resilience engineering):22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hollnagel E, Hounsgaard J, Colligan L (2014) FRAM – the functional resonance analysis method - a handbook for the practical use of the method, 1st edn, no june. Middelfart, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Macedo Guimaraes LB, Fogliatto FS (2000) Macroergonomic design: a new methodology for ergonomic product design. In: Fourteenth triennial meeting of the international ergonomics association. International Ergonomics Association, San Diego, p 328

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Macedo Guimaraes LB (1999) Ergonomic approach: the macroergonomic method. In: de Macedo Guimaraes LB (ed) Ergonomics in production, 4th ed, vol 1. (Chap 1.1) FEENG, Porto Alegre

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliano Couto Portela .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Portela, J.C., de Macedo Guimarães, L.B. (2019). A Safety-II Approach on Operational Maneuvers of a Hydropower Plant. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics