Skip to main content

Shaping Future Work Systems by OSH Risk Assessments Early On

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 819))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With future work systems becoming more interactive, dynamic, and flexible, occupational safety and health (OSH) calls for prospective assessments of hazards and risks to facilitate prevention through design. German river locks for inland waterways will be composed of standardised objects representing a high level of OSH. A research project aimed at conducting risk assessments of river locks of the future; early in their planning stage, with standardised objects and referring to different EU Directives addressing safety and health at work. About 150 work scenarios across operational states and variations in river lock standardisation have been compiled and supplemented for instructing risk assessments. They also conveyed design requirements for setting up dynamic virtual reality (VR) planning models in future contexts of use. Initial feedback about VR simulation use for scenario-based risk assessments is positive and a design review suggested minor adjustments before risk assessments can be conducted that should facilitate OSH improvements and templates for future assessments. The project motivates applications in similar contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. EN ISO 6385 (2016) Ergonomic principles in the design of work systems. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kantowitz BH, Sorkin RD (1983) Human factors: understanding people-system relationships. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. EN 614-2 (2008) Safety of machinery – Ergonomic design principles – Part 2: Interactions between the design of machinery and work tasks. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  4. EU OSH Framework Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (with amendments 2008). Off J Eur Union L 183:1–8 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (recast). Off J Eur Union L 157:24–86 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. EU Construction Directive 92/57/EEC on the implementation of minimum safety and health requirements at temporary or mobile construction sites. Off J Eur Union L 245:6–22 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. BMVI (2014) Verkehrsinvestitionsbericht für das Berichtsjahr 2012. Deutscher Bundestag, Drucksache 18/580, 18 February 2014

    Google Scholar 

  8. BMVI (2016) Standardisierung von Binnenschiffsschleusenanalgen bis zu 10 m Fallhöhe (Erlass vom 20.12.2016 – WS 10/ 5212.4/1-2 (2576192)). BMVI, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meister D (1999) Simulation and modelling. In: Wilson JR, Corlett EN (eds) Evaluation of human work. A practical ergonomics methodology. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 202–228

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller C, Nickel P, Di Nocera F, Mulder B, Neerincx M, Parasuraman R, Whiteley I (2012) Human-machine interface. In: Hockey GRJ (ed) THESEUS cluster 2: psychology and human-machine systems – report. Indigo, Strasbourg, pp 22–38

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chapanis A, van Cott HP (1972) Human engineering tests and evaluations. In: van Cott HP, Kinkade RG (eds) Human engineering guide to equipment design. AIR, Washington, pp 701–728

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stanton N (1996) Simulators: a review of research and practice. In: Stanton N (ed) Human factors in nuclear safety. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 117–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Nickel P, Lungfiel A (2018) Improving occupational safety and health (OSH) in human-system interaction (HSI) through applications in virtual environments. In: Duffy VG (ed) Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10917. Springer, Cham, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  14. Commission European (1996) Guidance on risk assessment at work. ECSC-EC-EAEC, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  15. Merdian J (1995) Risikobeurteilung in Arbeitssystemen. Die BG 10:518–524

    Google Scholar 

  16. EN ISO 12100 (2010) Safety of machinery – general principles for design – risk assessment and risk reduction. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  17. Główczyńska-Woelke K, Łyjak G, Gruber H, Vlková S, Nagy K, Schenk C, Šmerhovský Z (2010) Guide for risk assessment in small and medium enterprises. Verlag Technik & Information, Bochum

    Google Scholar 

  18. European Commission (2010) Non-binding guide to good practice for understanding and implementing Directive 92/57/EEC ‘Construction Sites’. Common, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Commission for the Study of Locks (1996) Final report of the international commission for the study of locks. PIANC, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management (2000) Design of locks (Report by the Civil Engineering Division). Bouwdienst Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nickel P, Kergel R, Wachholz T, Pröger E, Lungfiel A (2015) Setting-up a virtual reality simulation for improving OSH in standardisation of river locks. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on the safety of industrial automated systems (SIAS 2015). DGUV, Berlin, pp 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chun CK, Li H, Skitmore RM (2012) The use of virtual prototyping for hazard identification in the early design stage. Constr Innov 12(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou W, Whyte J, Sacks R (2012) Construction safety and digital design: a review. Autom Constr 22:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pröger E, Nickel P, Lungfiel A (2015) Risikobeurteilung nach Maschinenrichtlinie an einer virtuellen Neckarschleuse. Der Ing 54(2):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  25. EN IEC 61160 (2005) Design review. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wickens CD, Hollands JG, Banbury S, Parasuraman R (2013) Engineering psychology and human performance. Pearson, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nickel P, Nachreiner F (2010) Evaluation arbeitspsychologischer Interventionsmaßnahmen. In: Kleinbeck U, Schmidt K (eds) Arbeitspsychologie (Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, D, III, 1). Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 1003–1038

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Nickel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nickel, P., Janning, M., Wachholz, T., Pröger, E. (2019). Shaping Future Work Systems by OSH Risk Assessments Early On. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics