Abstract
Repetitive manual lifting and lowering tasks exposes workers to a high-risk musculoskeletal disorder. This paper aims at the assessment of postures of workers during the piling up process of a Concrete Block and Bricks (CB&B) at CB&B manufacturing factories in Pakistan and to study the effect of different risk factors such as contact force, stresses, and repetition of jobs that put muscles under redundant physical forces, which causes musculoskeletal disorders. The lifting indices (LI) of concrete blocks are 1.57 at the origin and 2.04 at the destination similarly LI for the bricks were 0.60 at the origin and 0.77 at the destination using the NOISH equation. For this purpose, the anthropometric data of 103 workers, working in 33 different factories, was collected. The postures were simulated and analyzed, using a human modelling solution HumanCAD software, with an objective to minimize the risk of work-related injuries, and stresses on the different parts of body was calculated. The results showed in current work environment, 38.83% of workers have lower back musculoskeletal disorder, followed by 31.06% with upper back, 29.12% with thorax and 24.27% with neck. Therefore, re-design the lifting methods of CB&B factories are essential in order to reduce the work-related injuries. The reports were shared with the CB&B industries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
International Labor Standards on Occupational Safety and Health (2017) http://www.ilo.org/global/standards/subjects-covered-by-international-labour-standards/occupational-safety-and-health/lang–en/index.htm
Jamali AA et al (2016) Assessment of Occupational Health, Safety and Environment in Brick Kiln Industries at Tando Hyder, Pakistan
Dussault G, Franceschini MC (2006) Not enough there, too many here: understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforce. Hum Resources Health 4(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-4-12
Russell SJ et al (2007) Comparing the results of five lifting analysis tools. Appl Ergon 38(1):91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.12.006
Harreby M et al (1999) Risk factors for low back pain in a cohort of 1389 Danish school children: an epidemiologic study. Eur Spine J 8(6):444–450
Engels JA et al (1996) Work related risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints in the nursing profession: results of a questionnaire survey. Occup Environ Med 53(9):636–641
Marras W (2000) Occupational low back disorder causation and control. Ergonomics 43(7):880–902
Dagli CH Artificial neural networks for intelligent manufacturing
Waters TR et al (1993) Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36(7):749–776
Choobineh A, Tabatabaee SH, Behzadi M (2009) Musculoskeletal problems among workers of an iranian sugar-producing factory. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 15(4):419–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2009.11076820
Choobineh A et al (2007) Musculoskeletal problems in Iranian hand-woven carpet industry: Guidelines for workstation design. Appl Ergon 38(5):617–624
Keyserling WM (2000) Workplace risk factors and occupational musculoskeletal disorders, Part 2: a review of biomechanical and psychophysical research on risk factors associated with upper extremity disorders. AIHAJ-Am Ind Hyg Assoc 61(2):231–243
Takala E-P et al (2010) Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 3–24
Stock SR (1991) Workplace ergonomic factors and the development of musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limbs: a meta-analysis. Am J Ind Med 19(1):87–107
Pavlović-Veselinović S Repetition as a risk factor for the development of musculoskeletal disorders
Loisel P et al (2005) Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):507–524
Dall TM et al (2013) Modeling the indirect economic implications of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment. Cost Eff Resource Alloc 11(1):5
Dul J, Neumann WP (2009) Ergonomics contributions to company strategies. Appl Ergon 40(4):745–752
Rost K, Smith JL, Dickinson M (2004) The effect of improving primary care depression management on employee absenteeism and productivity a randomized trial. Med Care 42(12):1202
Braakman-Jansen LM et al (2011) Productivity loss due to absenteeism and presenteeism by different instruments in patients with RA and subjects without RA. Rheumatology 51(2):354–361
Johns G (2011) Attendance dynamics at work: the antecedents and correlates of presenteeism, absenteeism, and productivity loss. J Occup Health Psychol 16(4):483
David G (2005) Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med 55(3):190–199
Schaub KG et al (2012) Ergonomic assessment of automotive assembly tasks with digital human modelling and the ‘ergonomics assessment worksheet’(EAWS). Int J Hum Factors Model Simul 3(3–4):398–426
Ding Z (2013) Manual assembly modelling and simulation for ergonomics analysis. Citeseer
Chang SW, Wang MJJ (2007) Digital human modeling and workplace evaluation: using an automobile assembly task as an example. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 17(5):445–455
Duffy VG (2008) Handbook of digital human modeling: research for applied ergonomics and human factors engineering. CRC Press, Cambridge
Chaffin DB (2008) Digital human modeling for workspace design. Rev Hum Factors Ergon 4(1):41–74
Colombo G, Regazzoni D, Rizzi C (2013) Ergonomic design through virtual Humans. Comput Aided Des Appl 10(5):745–755
Álvarez-Casado E et al (2016) Using ergonomic digital human modeling in evaluation of workplace design and prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders aboard small fishing vessels. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 26(4):463–472
Lämkull D, Hanson L, Örtengren R (2009) A comparative study of digital human modelling simulation results and their outcomes in reality: a case study within manual assembly of automobiles. Int J Ind Ergon 39(2):428–441
Waters TR (2007) When is it safe to manually lift a patient? AJN Am J Nurs 107(8):53–58
Chung MK, Kee D (2000) Evaluation of lifting tasks frequently performed during fire brick manufacturing processes using NIOSH lifting equations. Int J Ind Ergon 25(4):423–433
Waters T, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A (2003) Revised NIOSH lifting equation. Occup Ergon Eng Adm Controls
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to all Brick and Concrete Block industries administrations and workers who participated in this study. The Author(s) also like to thank Board of Studies and Advanced Research (BOSAR), University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar for the research funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ullah, Z., Maqsood, S., Nawaz, R., Ahmad, I. (2019). Evaluation of Repetitive Lifting Tasks Performed in Brick and Concrete Block Factories in Pakistan. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 822. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96077-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96077-7_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96076-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96077-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)