Abstract
In this chapter, the authors analyze the notion of quality in the quality assurance systems and it discusses how the quality assurance systems have affected universities and students alike. Over the last 20 years, universities around the globe have been subject to comprehensive quality assurance systems and procedures. These quality assurance systems have become a very contested territory. The proponents of the quality agenda argue that the quality assurance systems set a more or less common framework for quality assurance, and that they enable improvement of quality, by supporting mutual trust within and across universities and borders and by providing valuable information on quality for the media and stakeholders. It is also argued that universities act in a changed and increasingly knowledge-based world where higher education plays a crucial role in socioeconomic and cultural development. According to some, these changes call for new regulatory tools such as the quality assurance systems to ensure high standards for research and the relevance of students’ qualifications. On the other side, the quality assurance systems have also received strong criticism. The quality assurance agenda has been fueled by the fact that benchmarking and the production of comparable data globally have become crucial governing tools. And accompanied by other (neoliberal) regulatory tools, the quality assurance systems are accused of having changed academia, and some would even argue that they have threatened the raison d’être of academia by turning universities into manufacturing companies with counterproductive quality standards.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrahamsen, A. (2017). Stress og arbejdsvilkår blandt universitetsansatte forskere. København: Tænketanken DEA.
Alves, A. M. (2015). Thinking beyond instrumentality. What if dangerous ideas were the future of academia? In E. Westergaard & J.S. Wiewiura, (Eds.), On the facilitation of the academy (pp. 71–86). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Berg, L. D., Huijbens, E. H., & Larsen, H. G. (2016). Producing anxiety in the neoliberal university. The Canadian Geographer, 60(2), 168–180.
Busch, L. (2017). Knowledge for sale. The neoliberal takeover of higher education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Editions Quae.
Craig, R., Amernic, J., & Tourish, D. (2014). Perverse audit culture and accountability of the Modern Public University. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(1), 0267–4424.
Davidovitch, N. (2016). Contemporary challenges of higher education in Israel. In J. Zajda & V. Rust (Eds.), Globalisation and higher education reforms. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Filippakou, O., & Tapper, T. (2008). Quality assurance and quality enhancement in higher education: Contested territories? Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1/2), 84–100.
Furedi, F. (2017). What’s happened to the university? A sociological exploration of its infantilisation. New York: Routledge.
Gibbs, P. (2015). Happiness and education: Troubling students for their own contentment. Time & Society, 24(1), 54–70.
Gourlay, L. (2017). Student engagement, ‘learnification’ and the sociomaterial: Critical perspectives on higher education policy. Higher Education Policy, 2017(30), 23–34.
Jarvis, D. S. L. (2014). Regulating higher education: Quality assurance and neo-liberal managerialism in higher education—a critical introduction. Policy and Society, 155–166.
Korsgaard, M. T., & Mortensen, S. S. (2017). Towards a shift in perspective for inclusive education research—a continental approach. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(12), 1245–1260.
Larsen, S. N. (2015). Top-down universities governance eradicates thinking and good teaching. In E. Westergaard & J. S. Wiewiura (Eds.), On the facilitation of the academy (pp. 87–100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Long, B. (2010). Losing sight of Humboldt: A synoptic review of Australian government policy over the last 35 years. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(3), 451–465.
Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38(3), 599–629.
Moss, P. (2014). Transformative change and real utopias in early childhood education. A story of democracy, experimentation and potentiality. London: Routledge.
Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG) (2015). Brussels. Belgium.
Sugarman, J. (2015). Neoliberalism and psychological ethics. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35(2), 103–116.
Tanggaard, L. (2018). Creativity in higher education: Apprenticeship as a thinking-model for bringing back more dynamic, teaching and research in a university context. This volume.
Thorley, C. (2017). Not by degrees. Improving the student mental health in the UK’s universities. Institute for Public Policy Research.
Zajda, J. & Rust, V. (2016). Current research trends in globalisation and neo-liberalism in higher education. In J. Zajda & V. Rust (Eds.), Globalisation and higher education reforms. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szulevicz, T., Feilberg, C. (2018). What Has Happened to Quality?. In: Valsiner, J., Lutsenko, A., Antoniouk, A. (eds) Sustainable Futures for Higher Education. Cultural Psychology of Education, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96035-7_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96035-7_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96034-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96035-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)