Abstract
“Technological fix,” like “magic bullet,” is a key term in many critiques of agricultural biotechnology. And, like the magic bullet, the idea of a technological fix is a central element in the narrative of progress. Despite being a largely derisive label, the technological fix strategy continues to guide research in agricultural biotechnology. The objective of this chapter is to identify and clarify criticisms of the technological fix strategy. Carefully examining the technological fix strategy provides insights on how to move beyond the narrative crisis created by the conflict between technological optimism and technological pessimism. I argue that neither sweeping endorsements nor sweeping rejections of genetic or technological fixes in agriculture are justified. Rather, we need pragmatic critiques that identify defects and limitations inherent in of this strategy. Similar to the inherent defects of the reductive magic bullet strategy, the technological fix strategy needs to be corrected by placing innovations within a larger, more comprehensive context. Lessons from this chapter will be applied to evaluate examples of genetically engineered crops and production animals in Chap. 6.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altieri, M. 2000. Genetic engineering and agriculture: The myths, environmental risks, and alternatives. Oakland: Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy.
Borlaug, N. 2000. Ending world hunger: The promise of biotechnology and the threat of antiscience zealotry. Plant Physiology 124 (2): 487–490. http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/124/2/487. Accessed 24 May 2016.
Drengson, A.R. 1984. The sacred and the limits of the technological fix. Zygon 19 (3): 259–275.
Drengson, A.R. Some thoughts on the deep ecology movement. Deep Ecology. http://www.deepecology.org/deepecology.htm. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.
Easterbrook, G. 1997. Forgotten benefactor of humanity. Atl Mon 279 (1): 75–82.
Etzioni, A., and R. Remp. 1973. Technological “shortcuts” to social change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Evenson, R.E., and D. Gollin. 2003. Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 5620 (300): 758–762.
Kuhn, T. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Lansing, J.S. 1991. Priests and programmers: Technologies of power in the engineered landscape of Bali. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lecain, T.L. 2004. When everybody wins does the environment lose? The environmental techno-fix in twentieth-century mining. In The technological fix: How people use technology to create and solve social problems, ed. L. Rosner, 137–153. New York: Routledge.
Machbub, B., H.F. Ludwig, and D. Gunaratnam. 1988. Environmental impact from agrochemicals in Bali (Indonesia). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 11 (1): 1–23.
Marx, L. 1983. Are science and society going in the same direction? Science Technology and Human Values 8 (4): 6–9.
Naess, A. 1973. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry 1–4 (16): 95–100.
Paarlberg, R. 2005. From the green revolution to the gene revolution. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 47 (1): 38–40.
Rosner, L., ed. 2004. The technological fix: How people use technology to create and solve social problems. New York: Routledge.
Teich, A.H. 1993. Technology and the future. 6th ed. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Thompson, P.B. 1995. The Spirit of the soil: Agriculture and environmental ethics. New York: Routledge.
Thompson, P.B. 2009. Can agricultural biotechnology help the poor? The answer is yes, but with qualifications. Science Progress. http://scienceprogress.org/2009/06/ag-biotech-thompson/. Accessed 25 May 2016.
Tilman, D. 1998. The greening of the green revolution. Nature 396: 211–212.
Toulmin, S.E. 2001. Return to reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Trewavas, A. 2001. The population/biodiversity paradox: Agricultural efficiency to save wilderness. Plant Physiology 125: 174–179.
Volti, R. 1995. Society and technological change. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Weinberg, A.M. 1969. Reflections on big science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
White, L.T. 1967. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 3767 (155): 1203–1207.
Winner, L. 2004. Technology as forms of life. In Readings in the philosophy of technology, ed. D.M. Kaplan, 103–113. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scott, N.D. (2018). Technological Fixes I, Origins, Philosophy and Criticisms. In: Food, Genetic Engineering and Philosophy of Technology. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96027-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96027-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96025-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96027-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)