Toward Computing with Spider Webs: Computational Setup Realization
Spiders are able to extract crucial information, such as the location prey, predators, mates, and even broken threads from propagating web vibrations. The complex structure of the web suggests that the morphology itself might provide computational support in form of a mechanical signal processing system - often referred to as morphological computation. We present preliminary results on identifying these computational aspects in naturally spun webs. A recently presented definition for physical computational systems, consisting of three main elements: (i) a mathematical part, (ii) a computational setup with a theoretical and real part, and (iii) an interpretation, is employed for the first time, to characterize these morphological computation properties. Signal transmission properties of a real spider orb web, as the real part of a morphological computation setup, is investigated in response to step transverse inputs. The parameters of a lumped system model, as the theoretical part of a morphological computation setup, are identified empirically and with the help of an earlier FEM model for the same web. As the possible elements of a computational framework, the web transverse signal filtering, attenuation, delay, memory effect, and deformation modes are briefly discussed based on experimental data and numerical simulations.
KeywordsMorphological computation Spider web Vibration Lumped system model Signal processing
This work is supported by the Leverhulme Trust Research Project, “Computing with spiders’ web”, number RPG-2016-345, granted to H.H. and F.V.; and the Royal Academy of Engineering (research fellowship RF1516/15/11), granted to L.R. With special thanks to Dr. Helmut Hauser, Dr. Ludovic Renson, Dr. Beth Mortimer, Prof. Fritz Vollrth, Dr. S. Elnaz Naghibi and Alan Quille who contribute to this research by helpful discussions, exchanging ideas, proofreading the draft and providing helpful comments.
- 2.Vollrath, F.: Coevolution of behaviour and material in the spiders web. In: Biomechanics in Animal Behaviour, pp. 315–29 (2000)Google Scholar
- 14.Hauser, H., Füchslin, R.M., Pfeifer, R.: Opinions and Outlooks on Morphological Computation. E-Book (2014)Google Scholar
- 19.Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J.: How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006). Google-Books-ID: EHPMv9MfgWwCGoogle Scholar
- 20.Sornkarn, N., Howard, M., Nanayakkara, T.: Internal impedance control helps information gain in embodied perception. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 6685–6690 (2014)Google Scholar
- 22.Zhao, Q., Nakajima, K., Sumioka, H., Hauser, H., Pfeifer, R.: Spine dynamics as a computational resource in spine-driven quadruped locomotion. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1445–1451, November 2013Google Scholar
- 27.Giunti, M.: What is a physical realization of a computational system? ISONOMIA, 9(Epistemologica Series, Special Issue: Reasoning, Metaphor and Science), 177–192 (2017)Google Scholar
- 29.Sadati, S.: AutoTMTDyn Software Package, May 2017. https://github.com/hadisdt/AutoTMTDyn